Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
yeah coincidence. the whining means the oil pump was failing due to chunks of clutch pack breaking apart inside (mechanical defect, fluid does not cause it). i change my fluid about once a year to keep it new and been doing that from 18k miles. i have 90k now on my 2002. trans started slipping at 50k, did not get any worse til now. trans fluid change does not cause any problem, in fact it will help it last longer. if you already have the defect, it will break regardless of the fluid. some had theirs go in 20k miles, others at 120k miles. it just depends on the conditions. supposedly the 04-05 trans is supposed to have fixed the problem, but i never found out for sure. 01-02 is the worst, 03 is questionable.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
yeah coincidence. the whining means the oil pump was failing due to chunks of clutch pack breaking apart inside (mechanical defect, fluid does not cause it). i change my fluid about once a year to keep it new and been doing that from 18k miles. i have 90k now on my 2002. trans started slipping at 50k, did not get any worse til now. trans fluid change does not cause any problem, in fact it will help it last longer. if you already have the defect, it will break regardless of the fluid. some had theirs go in 20k miles, others at 120k miles. it just depends on the conditions. supposedly the 04-05 trans is supposed to have fixed the problem, but i never found out for sure. 01-02 is the worst, 03 is questionable.
I think 2003 transmission are 50/50, or I should say hit or missed.
You kind of gave me a relief about replacing the fluid, which I will do sometime soon. I hope that is not a $2000+ trans fluid change.
2003 Honda Civic LX Coupe - 70,500 miles
I have a 2003 Honda Civic LX Coupe with 70,500 miles. I have done 3 auto-trans fluid changes on the vehicle all at a dealership, along with all of the proper scheduled maintenance there as well. The fluid changes were at the following intervals:
15K miles
30K miles
58K miles
Anyways, my auto-transmission problems are as follows:
- unless i let the car heat up for 5-10 mins, when accelerating the car sounds like it is going in reverse and whines very loud
- shifting gears 1-2 is a jolt
- shifting gears 2-3 is a long shift
- shifting gears 3-4 is a long shift
I took it to several shops, including the dealership where I purchased the vehicle. All of them said that the transmission is dying and will need to be rebuilt, however the dealership said that Honda does not allow dealerships to rebuild transmission, rather they have to get a factory rebuilt transmission from Honda directly for the repair.
The rebuild quoted me between $800-$1500 depending on the parts that need to be replaced, and the dealership quoted me $2,900 for the factory rebuilt transmission. The rebuild comes with a 12-month/12,000-mile warranty and the Honda factory rebuild transmission comes with a 3yr/36,000-mile warranty.
I told the dealership that I want them to call Honda Corporate and ask them to pay for some of this repair, because an auto-transmission should not fail at 70K miles especially since the fluid was changed 3X with Honda fluid at a dealership, as well as having all proper maintenance done at a dealership. The dealership got back to me and said that Honda Corporate is willing to chip in $1,000 for replacement transmission, so now my bill will be down to $1,900. That's satisfactory to me and while I feel that my transmission was built with the same defect that the 2001's were built with (my 2003 Civic had a 2002 build date and could possibly have a 2001 auto-transmission), Honda is not required by any means to replace my transmission for a vehicle that is nearing 7 years old and 70K+ miles.
I am getting the replacement transmission on Wednesday, and it will run me $1,900 which is all inclusive (taxes, fees, labor, etc). The factory rebuilt transmission from Honda will come with a 3yr/36K-mile warranty so for the next 3 years I am guaranteed from having any kind of transmission issues. I am satisfied because Honda has at least recognized there is a problem with their early 2000's transmissions in both their Accords and Civics. While I will never purchase a Honda Civic again, I will still consider Honda in a future purchase, and would probably not go with anything except for an Accord or CR-V. I feel that Honda tried to squeeze more profit margin out on their 7th generation Civics at the expense of quality, and what is to stop them from doing it again on their 8th generation? I can already tell they went cheap on the quality of the interior plastics on the 8th generation, so that's one of many reasons why I will never go with a Civic again.
Background on my Civic ownership history:
I used to own a 1997 Honda Civic LX Sedan. It was a hand-me-down vehicle from one of my parents. I took the vehicle up to 92K miles and it never had any issues. I only had to change the brakes twice on that vehicle, and the rotors only once. Everything done on it was routine like what I mentioned above, along with oil changes, spark plugs, tires, etc. Everything else on the vehicle was original including the suspension. It was running perfectly fine at 92K miles, and in early 2003 Honda came out with special financing along with big rebate incentives for their 2003 Honda Civics. The financing was 0.9% APR and I got $2,000 instantly off the price of the new Civic. I couldn't give up this offer, expecting to get the same level of quality that I had with my 1997 Civic. With my trade-in, their $2,000 incentive, more haggling, and another $2,000 down-payment, I was able to walk away with a brand new 2003 Honda Civic Coupe in Rallye Red for $151/mo for my monthly payment. It was an offer I couldn't resist so I did it. Biggest mistake of my life because I know my 1997 Civic would still be running today as a 12-yr old vehicle with what would be 160K+ miles. Granted, at that point it would need a timing belt and new shocks/struts, but I bet the transmission would still be running perfectly fine!
Well I learned my lesson on that one...so with my new transmission I will probably just run this 2003 Civic into the ground. If the factory transmission lasted me 7-years/70K miles, if I got another 70K out of my 2003 Civic I would be happy. Is that likely to happen? Who knows...but I'm at least guaranteed for another 3yrs/36K miles. Since it's only a 5 mile drive to base every day, I won't even come close to hitting the mileage warranty limit.
That's my story, sorry for the long novel, but I just wanted to describe my situation in full detail so people understand what was going on. Also, I just wanted to express my extreme dissatisfaction for the lack of build-quality for Honda's 7th-Generation Civics, especially model years 2001-2003. I used to work with 2 engineers who used to work at Honda, and they said that Honda Value Engineered the crap out of the 7th generation Civic, which would explain why they have so many problems. They said that the 8th generation had a large increase in build quality since it was designed better, but I'm sure as heck not taking any chances!!!
15K miles
30K miles
58K miles
Anyways, my auto-transmission problems are as follows:
- unless i let the car heat up for 5-10 mins, when accelerating the car sounds like it is going in reverse and whines very loud
- shifting gears 1-2 is a jolt
- shifting gears 2-3 is a long shift
- shifting gears 3-4 is a long shift
I took it to several shops, including the dealership where I purchased the vehicle. All of them said that the transmission is dying and will need to be rebuilt, however the dealership said that Honda does not allow dealerships to rebuild transmission, rather they have to get a factory rebuilt transmission from Honda directly for the repair.
The rebuild quoted me between $800-$1500 depending on the parts that need to be replaced, and the dealership quoted me $2,900 for the factory rebuilt transmission. The rebuild comes with a 12-month/12,000-mile warranty and the Honda factory rebuild transmission comes with a 3yr/36,000-mile warranty.
I told the dealership that I want them to call Honda Corporate and ask them to pay for some of this repair, because an auto-transmission should not fail at 70K miles especially since the fluid was changed 3X with Honda fluid at a dealership, as well as having all proper maintenance done at a dealership. The dealership got back to me and said that Honda Corporate is willing to chip in $1,000 for replacement transmission, so now my bill will be down to $1,900. That's satisfactory to me and while I feel that my transmission was built with the same defect that the 2001's were built with (my 2003 Civic had a 2002 build date and could possibly have a 2001 auto-transmission), Honda is not required by any means to replace my transmission for a vehicle that is nearing 7 years old and 70K+ miles.
I am getting the replacement transmission on Wednesday, and it will run me $1,900 which is all inclusive (taxes, fees, labor, etc). The factory rebuilt transmission from Honda will come with a 3yr/36K-mile warranty so for the next 3 years I am guaranteed from having any kind of transmission issues. I am satisfied because Honda has at least recognized there is a problem with their early 2000's transmissions in both their Accords and Civics. While I will never purchase a Honda Civic again, I will still consider Honda in a future purchase, and would probably not go with anything except for an Accord or CR-V. I feel that Honda tried to squeeze more profit margin out on their 7th generation Civics at the expense of quality, and what is to stop them from doing it again on their 8th generation? I can already tell they went cheap on the quality of the interior plastics on the 8th generation, so that's one of many reasons why I will never go with a Civic again.
Background on my Civic ownership history:
I used to own a 1997 Honda Civic LX Sedan. It was a hand-me-down vehicle from one of my parents. I took the vehicle up to 92K miles and it never had any issues. I only had to change the brakes twice on that vehicle, and the rotors only once. Everything done on it was routine like what I mentioned above, along with oil changes, spark plugs, tires, etc. Everything else on the vehicle was original including the suspension. It was running perfectly fine at 92K miles, and in early 2003 Honda came out with special financing along with big rebate incentives for their 2003 Honda Civics. The financing was 0.9% APR and I got $2,000 instantly off the price of the new Civic. I couldn't give up this offer, expecting to get the same level of quality that I had with my 1997 Civic. With my trade-in, their $2,000 incentive, more haggling, and another $2,000 down-payment, I was able to walk away with a brand new 2003 Honda Civic Coupe in Rallye Red for $151/mo for my monthly payment. It was an offer I couldn't resist so I did it. Biggest mistake of my life because I know my 1997 Civic would still be running today as a 12-yr old vehicle with what would be 160K+ miles. Granted, at that point it would need a timing belt and new shocks/struts, but I bet the transmission would still be running perfectly fine!
Well I learned my lesson on that one...so with my new transmission I will probably just run this 2003 Civic into the ground. If the factory transmission lasted me 7-years/70K miles, if I got another 70K out of my 2003 Civic I would be happy. Is that likely to happen? Who knows...but I'm at least guaranteed for another 3yrs/36K miles. Since it's only a 5 mile drive to base every day, I won't even come close to hitting the mileage warranty limit.
That's my story, sorry for the long novel, but I just wanted to describe my situation in full detail so people understand what was going on. Also, I just wanted to express my extreme dissatisfaction for the lack of build-quality for Honda's 7th-Generation Civics, especially model years 2001-2003. I used to work with 2 engineers who used to work at Honda, and they said that Honda Value Engineered the crap out of the 7th generation Civic, which would explain why they have so many problems. They said that the 8th generation had a large increase in build quality since it was designed better, but I'm sure as heck not taking any chances!!!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
it started getting much worse after 2000 model. the 8thgens are terrible too. if you ever drive one, you will see what i mean. our 92 accord is still ticking on the original auto trans with smooth shifts, and my 2002 civic started slipping at 50k miles. im treating it like a baby with all sorts of trans upgrades and new fluid yearly, oil cooler and filter, etc. its made it to 90k, but i cant drive anymore in the cold unless i let it warm up first, otherwise it will slip like crazy. its just poor quality parts and design. TCI used to make a rebuild kit for the trans with beefier parts, but i think its not for sale anymore.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
it started getting much worse after 2000 model. the 8thgens are terrible too. if you ever drive one, you will see what i mean. our 92 accord is still ticking on the original auto trans with smooth shifts, and my 2002 civic started slipping at 50k miles. im treating it like a baby with all sorts of trans upgrades and new fluid yearly, oil cooler and filter, etc. its made it to 90k, but i cant drive anymore in the cold unless i let it warm up first, otherwise it will slip like crazy. its just poor quality parts and design. TCI used to make a rebuild kit for the trans with beefier parts, but i think its not for sale anymore.
i had an 8th generation coupe as a loaner when i was getting a 60K tuneup done back in January. are the 8th generation civics also have transmission issues?
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
im not sure, but when i drove a brand new one it felt like the auto trans was ready to fall apart. i even asked the guy why its so chunky getting into gear and not shifting very fast, he just made up some dumb reason that its supposed to be like that. i could never drive one, didnt even feel right sitting in it.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
auto-trans or stick? you make it sound like you have a stick
Last edited by jgg204; Nov 10, 2009 at 06:24 AM.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
im not sure, but when i drove a brand new one it felt like the auto trans was ready to fall apart. i even asked the guy why its so chunky getting into gear and not shifting very fast, he just made up some dumb reason that its supposed to be like that. i could never drive one, didnt even feel right sitting in it.
i didn't notice the transmission shifting in a rough fashion, but either way if i ever found myself with a 8th Civic in my hands, i would baby that auto-trans from day 1 and change the auto-trans fluid every 15K miles. i have no faith in Honda transmissions now, especially seeing how many people have been screwed over on their 7th gen Civics on this forum, as well as the thousands of people of www.carcomplaints.com who have been screwed over with 7th Gen Civic transmissions and 2001-2004 Honda Accord transmission.
i just don't get it...i mean...i thought it was just the American companies that couldn't get the basic mechanisms of a vehicle right. such as Ford's issues with transmissions in their Explorers, and GM's issues with head gaskets and poor engine design. i never would have thought that Honda would also cheap out on their transmissions. i think they lost a big group of loyal customers to Toyota and Subaru as a result of the stunt they pulled with the early 2000's Civics and Accords
Last edited by jgg204; Nov 10, 2009 at 06:33 AM.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
really. haha i felt the exact opposite. but i do have suspension upgrades on my car tho. couldnt wait to get back in my 7thgen. and yeah all cars these days seem to have poor quality. older cars are where its at, anything 2000 and below works great.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
so tomorrow i am getting the Honda Factory rebuilt transmission installed at a dealership. luckily i have off for Veteran's Day, which is allowing me to get it done in the middle of the week. it's a good thing, because this morning it has gotten especially bad and i don't even have confidence that it will last that much longer. so disappointed that this Civic has let me down but grateful at the same time that Honda Corporate has recognized that there is a problem and they are paying for $1,000 of it. so, instead of setting me back $2,900 , it is taking a large chunk out of my monthly income in the amount of $1,900. oh well... looking at the bright side of things, the new trans is guaranteed to last another 3 years. nothing else on the vehicle is having serious issues, and from reading forums and the www.carcomplaints.com website really only the following have been of a concern:
1) cheap engine mounts (already cracked and replaced)
2) cheap struts (these have not yet gone bad, but will be voluntarily replaced in 1 1/2 yrs or so)
3) transmission (is about to die and getting replaced tomorrow)
4) rocking driver's seat (the seat is already like that and i'm not sure when i will do the DIY)
Last edited by jgg204; Nov 10, 2009 at 01:50 PM.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
the front engine mount barely lasts 10k miles, the front lca bushings might last 50k if youre lucky. i replaced both with energy suspension inserts.dont bother doing the rocking seat diy, i already did and the problem came back 2 weeks later. only way to really fix it is adjust the seat how you like, then weld the height adjustment mechanism to the bracket (height adjustment wont work, but chair wont rock anymore). yeah the suspension is garbage too. it was bouncy from day 1.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
the front engine mount barely lasts 10k miles, the front lca bushings might last 50k if youre lucky. i replaced both with energy suspension inserts.dont bother doing the rocking seat diy, i already did and the problem came back 2 weeks later. only way to really fix it is adjust the seat how you like, then weld the height adjustment mechanism to the bracket (height adjustment wont work, but chair wont rock anymore). yeah the suspension is garbage too. it was bouncy from day 1.
1) how many times have you had to replace your engine mounts? why do they keep cracking so frequently? my engine mounts cracked / showed signs of cracking at roughly 60K miles. are there after market engine mounts that are more durable?
2) i still have the factory lower control arm bushings. if the bushings go bad, what kinds of signs would i notice?
3) so the new bushings on the rocking seat DIY didn't fix the problem for longer than a few weeks? did the replacement bushings fail or do you think the rocking seat has nothing to do with the bushings?
4) yeah, i hear you on the suspension being spongy. i actually felt that my suspension on my 1997 Civic. one of the problems this generation has, as i listed above, are that Honda put cheap factory struts in the vehicle. i bet i will need to replace them within the next 2 years
5) question about steering. i may just be paranoid or overly sensitive to the steering, but it seems that the steering wheel needs to be turned every so very slightly to the left for the vehicle to go straight. the car doesn't veer to the right like it would be if the vehicle was out of alignment. there is no "pulling" to the right, it just seems that the steering wheel is slightly off center, but ever so slightly. if i straighten the steering wheel so the wheel is dead-on straight in alignment with my dash then the car veers to the right. i've gotten numerous alignments and i have brand new tires, but it still does it. i may just be paranoid, and it could very well just be due to the crown of the road tilting to the right...it's just that i never really noticed it before and it seems that i have to turn the steering wheel to the left a little more than i have had to in the past when the road is crowning to the right. the way i tested this out, was i drove on the left-most lane of this one road that crowns to the left, and it seems that i don't have to turn the steering wheel to the left as much as i would have to if the road was crowning to the right. i hope that description wasn't too complicated!
6) any suggestions on alleviating the start of pistol tapping? any kind of oil treatments? the pistol tap (common on Subarus) is starting to become a minor presence, which i can tell while accelerating slowly along a median or road block b/c it reflects the sound of my engine through the window and i can hear it.
7) any general suggestions on getting this Civic to last me for the next 3 years? any other common components besides what i mentioned, that are known to fail and i should be looking out for?
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
1. people have gone thru as many as 4 front mounts in 50k miles. if you look at the flimsy construction, youll realize why they break. usually only one arm breaks, and you can repair it with the energy suspension motor mount inserts. they are polyurethane not rubber, so you will get some extra vibrations, but it will never need replacing again.
2. LCAs are the same way, crappy rubber bushings. cornering at hi speeds will be dangerous, alignment will be off, and you may even hear some noises when they go bad. usually 50-60k they will be torn to pieces. ES makes a full poly replacement and those are beefy bushings. they make creaking noises in the winter when going over bumps, which is well worth having never to replace em again and keeping good alignment.
3. rocking seat has nothing to do with the bushings. in fact, the original bushings were fine! its just the way they designed it. fail. im looking at getting an aftermarket seat to replace with. altho if i could find one, id get an LX seat (no height adjustment) from the same model year so the fabrics match.
4. oem shocks are very bad, almost any aftermarket like tokico hp will be a big upgrade.
5. its prolly just uneven road. and the wheel will never be perfectly centered anyway even with perfect alignment.
6. check my sig for the best oil and gas treatments. lubecontrol.com
7. not really sure, a whole lot could fail, or nothing. just depends on the car i guess.
2. LCAs are the same way, crappy rubber bushings. cornering at hi speeds will be dangerous, alignment will be off, and you may even hear some noises when they go bad. usually 50-60k they will be torn to pieces. ES makes a full poly replacement and those are beefy bushings. they make creaking noises in the winter when going over bumps, which is well worth having never to replace em again and keeping good alignment.
3. rocking seat has nothing to do with the bushings. in fact, the original bushings were fine! its just the way they designed it. fail. im looking at getting an aftermarket seat to replace with. altho if i could find one, id get an LX seat (no height adjustment) from the same model year so the fabrics match.
4. oem shocks are very bad, almost any aftermarket like tokico hp will be a big upgrade.
5. its prolly just uneven road. and the wheel will never be perfectly centered anyway even with perfect alignment.
6. check my sig for the best oil and gas treatments. lubecontrol.com
7. not really sure, a whole lot could fail, or nothing. just depends on the car i guess.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
1. people have gone thru as many as 4 front mounts in 50k miles. if you look at the flimsy construction, youll realize why they break. usually only one arm breaks, and you can repair it with the energy suspension motor mount inserts. they are polyurethane not rubber, so you will get some extra vibrations, but it will never need replacing again.
2. LCAs are the same way, crappy rubber bushings. cornering at hi speeds will be dangerous, alignment will be off, and you may even hear some noises when they go bad. usually 50-60k they will be torn to pieces. ES makes a full poly replacement and those are beefy bushings. they make creaking noises in the winter when going over bumps, which is well worth having never to replace em again and keeping good alignment.
3. rocking seat has nothing to do with the bushings. in fact, the original bushings were fine! its just the way they designed it. fail. im looking at getting an aftermarket seat to replace with. altho if i could find one, id get an LX seat (no height adjustment) from the same model year so the fabrics match.
4. oem shocks are very bad, almost any aftermarket like tokico hp will be a big upgrade.
5. its prolly just uneven road. and the wheel will never be perfectly centered anyway even with perfect alignment.
6. check my sig for the best oil and gas treatments. lubecontrol.com
7. not really sure, a whole lot could fail, or nothing. just depends on the car i guess.
2. LCAs are the same way, crappy rubber bushings. cornering at hi speeds will be dangerous, alignment will be off, and you may even hear some noises when they go bad. usually 50-60k they will be torn to pieces. ES makes a full poly replacement and those are beefy bushings. they make creaking noises in the winter when going over bumps, which is well worth having never to replace em again and keeping good alignment.
3. rocking seat has nothing to do with the bushings. in fact, the original bushings were fine! its just the way they designed it. fail. im looking at getting an aftermarket seat to replace with. altho if i could find one, id get an LX seat (no height adjustment) from the same model year so the fabrics match.
4. oem shocks are very bad, almost any aftermarket like tokico hp will be a big upgrade.
5. its prolly just uneven road. and the wheel will never be perfectly centered anyway even with perfect alignment.
6. check my sig for the best oil and gas treatments. lubecontrol.com
7. not really sure, a whole lot could fail, or nothing. just depends on the car i guess.
also, what fuel system cleaner do you recommend? i've been using techron concentrate...it was recommended by my local mechanic.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
lubecontrol has LC20 which is the oil additive, and FP-plus for gas additive. those are the only products i use. i got tired of nothing in the store working at all and gave up on those junk. i used to use techron for 20k miles but still had massive carbon in the engine, didnt do a thing. heres the lubecontrol thread you can read more about it and the amounts to use.
https://www.civicforums.com/forums/1...-review-6.html
https://www.civicforums.com/forums/1...-review-6.html
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
On a side note, yup, definitely in the market for a new clutch soon.
Went to Subway tonight. Ordered at the drive through. Went to pull away, *clunk*. I stalled it. "Well this is embarrassing", I thought to myself. Started it up again and pulled foreward. Got my food, parked, ate it, and then went to reverse. Where I had parked, it was on a slight bit of a decline (my car was facing a few degrees down hill).
I started it up, put it in reverse, and proceeded to reverse. About a second and a half into it I finally realized "HEY WHAT THE HELL WHY AM I ROLLING FORWARD INSTEAD OF GOING BACKWARDS?".. then, before I had any I heard *crunchclunk clunk scrape clunk crunch* as my front bumper scraped over the curb in front.
"well that didn't sound good", I thought, as I attempted again to reverse out, this time successful - *crunch clunk scrape crash eeeek* I heard again as I reversed back out over the curb. Got out to check the front end - everything looks a-ok. Phew.
Sigh.
Went to Subway tonight. Ordered at the drive through. Went to pull away, *clunk*. I stalled it. "Well this is embarrassing", I thought to myself. Started it up again and pulled foreward. Got my food, parked, ate it, and then went to reverse. Where I had parked, it was on a slight bit of a decline (my car was facing a few degrees down hill).
I started it up, put it in reverse, and proceeded to reverse. About a second and a half into it I finally realized "HEY WHAT THE HELL WHY AM I ROLLING FORWARD INSTEAD OF GOING BACKWARDS?".. then, before I had any I heard *crunchclunk clunk scrape clunk crunch* as my front bumper scraped over the curb in front.
"well that didn't sound good", I thought, as I attempted again to reverse out, this time successful - *crunch clunk scrape crash eeeek* I heard again as I reversed back out over the curb. Got out to check the front end - everything looks a-ok. Phew.
Sigh.
Need Advice
So I have put roughly 400 miles on my new transmission from Honda (factory rebuilt transmission). I have noticed 3 things:
1) When driving anywhere above 40mph (typically in 3rd or 4th gear), if I am slowing down to a light or to get on an off-ramp (reasonable deceleration), the auto-transmission will "buck" and drop gear extremely fast, causing the car to jolt and my body to lurch forward. It doesn't do this all of the time, but it always does it when the road is on an incline or when I am getting on an off-ramp to the right. My other transmission never did this.
2) While I am in park, when I move the shifter to "reverse" the transmission makes a very loud crank then a jolt and the entire car shakes. My other transmission never did this before it died.
3) When shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear, the auto-transmission makes a hard jolt and the entire car shakes. The shift from 3rd to 4th gear still does it slightly, but it's much less noticeable. I notice that the 2nd to 3rd gear jolt seems to occur when I am at roughly 40mph when it shifts. Never has the shift from 1st to 2nd gear ever resulted in a jolt that actually makes the car "buck" per se. It seems that the shift from 2nd to 3rd is coming way too late, and the transmission tries to compensate by doing a quick shift. I will be driving and I will be expecting it to shift from 2nd to 3rd, it never does, then all of a sudden it jolts.
Maybe I am being too analytical, but I paid for a factory rebuild transmission and in my opinion it should drive like it's brand new and it is clearly driving like it was a few months before my previous transmission actually started slipping. While the new transmission has a 3yr/36K warranty, I feel that it shouldn't be doing the above 3 issues, especially after only 300-400 miles.
Any insight into these issues would be greatly appreciated, along with any advice on the issue. I am thinking that I will go back to the dealership and have them check it out. Chances are, they are going to give me a hard time and conveniently say they can't replicate the issues that I am having. I am so fed up with the auto-transmissions in the 7th generation Civic, I am | | close to walking in the dealership and demanding an entirely new transmission, since I know Honda doesn't allow its dealers to take apart transmissions.
1) When driving anywhere above 40mph (typically in 3rd or 4th gear), if I am slowing down to a light or to get on an off-ramp (reasonable deceleration), the auto-transmission will "buck" and drop gear extremely fast, causing the car to jolt and my body to lurch forward. It doesn't do this all of the time, but it always does it when the road is on an incline or when I am getting on an off-ramp to the right. My other transmission never did this.
2) While I am in park, when I move the shifter to "reverse" the transmission makes a very loud crank then a jolt and the entire car shakes. My other transmission never did this before it died.
3) When shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear, the auto-transmission makes a hard jolt and the entire car shakes. The shift from 3rd to 4th gear still does it slightly, but it's much less noticeable. I notice that the 2nd to 3rd gear jolt seems to occur when I am at roughly 40mph when it shifts. Never has the shift from 1st to 2nd gear ever resulted in a jolt that actually makes the car "buck" per se. It seems that the shift from 2nd to 3rd is coming way too late, and the transmission tries to compensate by doing a quick shift. I will be driving and I will be expecting it to shift from 2nd to 3rd, it never does, then all of a sudden it jolts.
Maybe I am being too analytical, but I paid for a factory rebuild transmission and in my opinion it should drive like it's brand new and it is clearly driving like it was a few months before my previous transmission actually started slipping. While the new transmission has a 3yr/36K warranty, I feel that it shouldn't be doing the above 3 issues, especially after only 300-400 miles.
Any insight into these issues would be greatly appreciated, along with any advice on the issue. I am thinking that I will go back to the dealership and have them check it out. Chances are, they are going to give me a hard time and conveniently say they can't replicate the issues that I am having. I am so fed up with the auto-transmissions in the 7th generation Civic, I am | | close to walking in the dealership and demanding an entirely new transmission, since I know Honda doesn't allow its dealers to take apart transmissions.
Last edited by jgg204; Nov 20, 2009 at 03:57 PM.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
1. normal, thats the grade logic control downshifting while braking on a sloped road. on flat road, it wont happen. maybe you just didnt notice before. all 01+ trans do this. try to brake slowly on an incline if possible.
2. if this is happening when the car is parked on level ground, then something may be wrong. mine makes clunk and jolt noises but does not shake the car unless car is parked on a hill and ebrake wasnt engaged. could be a bad trans mount that wasnt tightened or was worn out and not replaced.
3. this might be a result of them installing the newer revised clutch pack fix for the 2-3 gear shift. this was the defect in the original trans. while it shifted smoothly, the pack would wear out prematurely and kill the trans. harder shifting is usually easier on the trans. prolly shouldnt worry about this unless it becomes worse. remember, you have warranty. if it goes out again within the warranty, get another one and then sell the car. a new trans will be even worse than the rebuild, because then you are back to having a defective unit.
it wouldnt hurt to change the fluid after 3-4k miles once everything is broken in and all the particles are worn away from the new parts. keep checking the fluid and when it starts to turn dark (instead of bright red), give it some new fluid. add some LC20 if you bought that too, it greatly smoothens out the shifting.
2. if this is happening when the car is parked on level ground, then something may be wrong. mine makes clunk and jolt noises but does not shake the car unless car is parked on a hill and ebrake wasnt engaged. could be a bad trans mount that wasnt tightened or was worn out and not replaced.
3. this might be a result of them installing the newer revised clutch pack fix for the 2-3 gear shift. this was the defect in the original trans. while it shifted smoothly, the pack would wear out prematurely and kill the trans. harder shifting is usually easier on the trans. prolly shouldnt worry about this unless it becomes worse. remember, you have warranty. if it goes out again within the warranty, get another one and then sell the car. a new trans will be even worse than the rebuild, because then you are back to having a defective unit.
it wouldnt hurt to change the fluid after 3-4k miles once everything is broken in and all the particles are worn away from the new parts. keep checking the fluid and when it starts to turn dark (instead of bright red), give it some new fluid. add some LC20 if you bought that too, it greatly smoothens out the shifting.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
MY transmission went out last night.
05 civic 5 speed 78k miles,
On my way back from a friends house i started losing 4th and 5th gear, when i got home i looked under the car and it was leaking. the case is cracked, i dont know how that happened, but now i need to find a tranny and they seem impossible to find...
05 civic 5 speed 78k miles,
On my way back from a friends house i started losing 4th and 5th gear, when i got home i looked under the car and it was leaking. the case is cracked, i dont know how that happened, but now i need to find a tranny and they seem impossible to find...
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
wow i havent heard of many problems from the manual trans. try and see if any local junkyards have any.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
so i started thinking like a mad man, since i have a crack in the case and it possibly leaked on my trip home, will low trans fluid cause 4th and 5th gears to no stay engaged?
i started thinking maybe if i patch the crack and put fluid in it, wil it work then?
i started thinking maybe if i patch the crack and put fluid in it, wil it work then?
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
I was able to get about 1.75 quarts from the tranny so it had a good amount in it still.
I patched up the little hole with JB WELD, when it dries i will fill it up and see if its driavable or if i need a new one. I called a shop and he first quoted me $1195 labor and reman tranny... I wasnt very interested in the price, so i hung up on him. Then he called me 3 hours later and said $895 6 year warranty!!! sounds cheap to me.
I want to replace myself, but i cant find any good prices on a tranny, $500 for a used tranny in my area. Going to hit up the junk yards soon, and see if i can get one on Thanksgiving for HALF OFF. hopefully they have 01-05 civics.
I patched up the little hole with JB WELD, when it dries i will fill it up and see if its driavable or if i need a new one. I called a shop and he first quoted me $1195 labor and reman tranny... I wasnt very interested in the price, so i hung up on him. Then he called me 3 hours later and said $895 6 year warranty!!! sounds cheap to me.
I want to replace myself, but i cant find any good prices on a tranny, $500 for a used tranny in my area. Going to hit up the junk yards soon, and see if i can get one on Thanksgiving for HALF OFF. hopefully they have 01-05 civics.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
1. normal, thats the grade logic control downshifting while braking on a sloped road. on flat road, it wont happen. maybe you just didnt notice before. all 01+ trans do this. try to brake slowly on an incline if possible.
2. if this is happening when the car is parked on level ground, then something may be wrong. mine makes clunk and jolt noises but does not shake the car unless car is parked on a hill and ebrake wasnt engaged. could be a bad trans mount that wasnt tightened or was worn out and not replaced.
3. this might be a result of them installing the newer revised clutch pack fix for the 2-3 gear shift. this was the defect in the original trans. while it shifted smoothly, the pack would wear out prematurely and kill the trans. harder shifting is usually easier on the trans. prolly shouldnt worry about this unless it becomes worse. remember, you have warranty. if it goes out again within the warranty, get another one and then sell the car. a new trans will be even worse than the rebuild, because then you are back to having a defective unit.
it wouldnt hurt to change the fluid after 3-4k miles once everything is broken in and all the particles are worn away from the new parts. keep checking the fluid and when it starts to turn dark (instead of bright red), give it some new fluid. add some LC20 if you bought that too, it greatly smoothens out the shifting.
2. if this is happening when the car is parked on level ground, then something may be wrong. mine makes clunk and jolt noises but does not shake the car unless car is parked on a hill and ebrake wasnt engaged. could be a bad trans mount that wasnt tightened or was worn out and not replaced.
3. this might be a result of them installing the newer revised clutch pack fix for the 2-3 gear shift. this was the defect in the original trans. while it shifted smoothly, the pack would wear out prematurely and kill the trans. harder shifting is usually easier on the trans. prolly shouldnt worry about this unless it becomes worse. remember, you have warranty. if it goes out again within the warranty, get another one and then sell the car. a new trans will be even worse than the rebuild, because then you are back to having a defective unit.
it wouldnt hurt to change the fluid after 3-4k miles once everything is broken in and all the particles are worn away from the new parts. keep checking the fluid and when it starts to turn dark (instead of bright red), give it some new fluid. add some LC20 if you bought that too, it greatly smoothens out the shifting.
i'm starting to have some serious doubts about this replacement transmission. should i be proactive and take it back to the dealership to get checked out, or should i give it the benefit of the doubt and put a few more thousand miles on it before i take it in? since the warranty is for 3yrs/36K , i'm not under any pressure whatsoever to get it checked out...i just don't want the hassle of the transmission going in 1-2 years b/c it was defective from the get-go.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
i would drive a bit more and wait until something happens. all they will tell you is nothings wrong after driving it. i doubt they are gonna do anything to fix it if it is still driving.
Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
you seem to be very knowledgeable about the 7th generation auto-trans! have you had issues with your's before / had it replaced already? how many miles do you have on your 7th gen civic (and what year ) ?
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










Re: Who's had a bad transmission? *UPDATED*
its a 2002 civic sedan ex auto. has almost 91k on it now, its been slipping 2-3 gear since 50k miles. and i have aftermarket B&M trans oil cooler and civic hx cvt trans fluid external filter. i change the fluid every year and baby it.



