A New HICUP to stump the panel. RSX Injectors + boosted Civic + Missing Link=CEL....
BOOST JUNKY
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
From: Wide Open Throttle
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by MadWheel
The map sees boost when you make boost. It's just within tolerance for the ECU. At about 8.2-8.5psi I would have fuel cut due the MAP sensor.
So yeah, you can run 8psi with out a missing link. But Yvette has a missing link now (or at least I know she ordered one).
So yeah, you can run 8psi with out a missing link. But Yvette has a missing link now (or at least I know she ordered one).
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by SpdRcrChk
Mine didnt start to freak out until a little over 9psi. So we left it at 8 till i could get my hands on one.
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Hwoody77
RSX Injectors were flow-tested at 340CCs...
I'll have to look up my sheets from when I got them flow tested.
Registered!!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rep Power: 0 I had mine cleaned & Flow tested at Cruzin Performance for like $56 Shipped, these were my results:
To convert from lb/hr to cc/min, simply multiply the lb/hr by 10.5.
So for mine the average was 31.39 * 10.5 = 329cc
But Opto got 340cc? What would the difference be?
If you are going to be adjusting the fuel pressure, you can use the following formula to calculate the approximate fuel flow when adjusting the fuel pressure up or down:
new flow rate = (rated flow) * square root of(new fuel pressure/rated fuel
pressure)
To convert from lb/hr to cc/min, simply multiply the lb/hr by 10.5.
So for mine the average was 31.39 * 10.5 = 329cc
But Opto got 340cc? What would the difference be?
If you are going to be adjusting the fuel pressure, you can use the following formula to calculate the approximate fuel flow when adjusting the fuel pressure up or down:
new flow rate = (rated flow) * square root of(new fuel pressure/rated fuel
pressure)
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
I had mine cleaned & Flow tested at Cruzin Performance for like $56 Shipped, these were my results:
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
That seems to be about 323cc on average then. Seems to be differences, or is it in the way they were tested?
Registered!!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by dezod
It would be safe to say they are 320CC injectors. Error margin is in the users favor if more.
But mine were closer to 330, and Opto's seem to be closer to 340 I think?
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
But mine were closer to 330, and Opto's seem to be closer to 340 I think?
Ours are a closer comparison because Ibid Ereubus (Sure I butchered the spelling).
Registered!!
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 1
From: Zulu Alpha Tango Foxtrot
Rep Power: 312
Originally Posted by dezod
Yours may have had less mileage and such.....Anyway, OPTO's are a different story, his were flow tested at 340 @ 45 PSI, yours and mine were only done at 43.5 PSI.
Ours are a closer comparison because Ibid Ereubus (Sure I butchered the spelling).
Ours are a closer comparison because Ibid Ereubus (Sure I butchered the spelling).
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by HyaBoosta
so was there finally a solution? is it still throwing the cel?
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by HyaBoosta
So you got it working and no cel and the injectors in and running fine?
Registered!!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rep Power: 0 So Dezod is this the correct fix for using RSX Injectors & E-manage to get normal idle, and not the CEL, before tuning of course:
With the Injector correction feature not being used.
With the Injector correction feature not being used.
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
So Dezod is this the correct fix for using RSX Injectors & E-manage to get normal idle, and not the CEL, before tuning of course:
With the Injector correction feature not being used.
With the Injector correction feature not being used.
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
What about the 100rpm, should that be included too? What is Uber?
Rpm Scale-> 0 100 1000 1500 2000 2500, etc
or
Rpm Scale-> 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500, etc?
Rpm Scale-> 0 100 1000 1500 2000 2500, etc
or
Rpm Scale-> 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500, etc?
yes, 1000 rpms @ the same 2 throttle position points there as 0% throttle.
Registered!!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rep Power: 0 Bear with me here, so perhaps like this:
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 26,407
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Rep Power: 584 have u even got a base map at all so far, i didnt read all this, anyways, get a base map, and then drive it, and then while driving the screen will blink yellow everywhere, when u hit a snag, fix and drive again, snag fix, so on and so forth, im going to try and get my base 5 psi map, i dont know how long it will take, u might already be done by the time i get it
Thread Starter
7thgen Power Maker
iTrader: (74)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,048
Likes: 1
From: Buffalo, NY, US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by C2i0v0i1C
have u even got a base map at all so far, i didnt read all this, anyways, get a base map, and then drive it, and then while driving the screen will blink yellow everywhere, when u hit a snag, fix and drive again, snag fix, so on and so forth, im going to try and get my base 5 psi map, i dont know how long it will take, u might already be done by the time i get it
He's right . Use the real time data display and drive & data record the air flow meter input & output with RPM & TPS on the same graph. Those signals should be near identical. He is referring to realtime map trace too. Excellent function on this unit.
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
Bear with me here, so perhaps like this:
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Registered!!
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by C2i0v0i1C
have u even got a base map at all so far, i didnt read all this, anyways, get a base map, and then drive it, and then while driving the screen will blink yellow everywhere, when u hit a snag, fix and drive again, snag fix, so on and so forth, im going to try and get my base 5 psi map, i dont know how long it will take, u might already be done by the time i get it
Sorry, I have no basemap yet, but if I do manage to get one I will do just that, it sounds like a good way to tune before getting it to the dyno for fine tuning.
Registered!!
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 1
From: Zulu Alpha Tango Foxtrot
Rep Power: 312
Originally Posted by Canadian2k1SI
Bear with me here, so perhaps like this:
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Or would this one be more appropriate to match better with the other maps, or are they the same?
Do they both represent 42% additional air between 0-3% throttle position and 0-1999 rpm?
Or is the rpm transition more linear by adjusting between 1500 and 2000? Example @ 1750 rpm it would be either 42% or 21% depending how e-manage averages it, my guess is that it would be 21% for smoother transitions between different values on the map.
Registered!!
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,024
Likes: 1
From: Zulu Alpha Tango Foxtrot
Rep Power: 312
Originally Posted by canadian2k1si
So this should be the correct way?
