Oooops - Huge Timing Belt Job No No

Subscribe
Jun 27, 2015
  #1  
So what's this timing belt job no no?

Turning the crank when the timing belt was not on.

Too bad I discovered this after the fact. I was changing timing belt because the car would only start if I disconnected the crank sensor, which is a classic sign that the timing is off.

So let's not dwell on how or why I managed to screw up or the fact that I'm an idiot. Instead I'm wondering if there is a way out of this mess.

I got to this point because as I was turning the crank (sigh) I noticed it got a bit tougher to turn. So I didn't force it, and did a little research. I tried to test the state of things by gently trying to turn the camshaft. It doesn't want to move. So, I know I've really screwed things up. I'm hoping I haven't already bent a shaft or something.

What should I do next? Call a wrecker? Lol. Hopefully it doesn't come to that. I've only got $850 or so into this Civic that I got used from someone who gave up on the car because they couldn't figure out how to replace the crank shaft sensor connector. Anyway...

Can anyone help?

Heath

P.S. Did I mention that I'm an idiot?

UPDATE: OK, so I think I may have it worked out (long story), and I've got the timing belt on and I believe it to be all timed well. I've turned the engine through 6 times and timing still looks good. My issue now is... how do I know if something is f**ked up in there? Would I hear it as I was turning the engine? Would I feel it? Is there something I can look for in the rocker arms as I'm turning?
Reply 0
Jun 27, 2015
  #2  
Re: Oooops - Huge Timing Belt Job No No
If you have the timing belt installed and correctly timed, you could bolt the crank pulley on and do a compression test.
Reply 0
Jun 27, 2015
  #3  
Re: Oooops - Huge Timing Belt Job No No
so maybe you think you bent a valve or two?? idk

IMO if you think the timing belt is on correct, run a compression test by hand (no starter, no ignition). but really check to see if the belt is on correctly first

good luck!
Reply 0
Subscribe