0-60 time
Originally posted by SHOgoy
"Pffft, you never found my car, I'm surprised it wasn't on that site I could rip that car apart and spit it out, just check out my timeslip data, lol. I can easily get sub 1 second 0-60 times, no sweat. Under 3 seconds to 100 too, and a sub 5 second 1/4 mile @ well over 200 mph. Also my car can hold 5.0+ g's on the skid pad, and that's in the wet! Pretty damned good for only 127hp, it's all about the VTEC..."
Haha, My Taurus SHO can do 0-60 in 6.7.. Get real. Get a V6.
"Depending on your parts, which I didn't look up, you are about $1000 worth of mods on your car and you are doing 8.5? You gotta drive that thing like you mean it."
If I had that much for my Lincoln Town Car I'd be pushing easily about 8.5 sec with a 4,300# car!
It's all about torque off the line, so if you can possibly find it with a 4 cylinder, supercharge or turbo will do just that.
"Pffft, you never found my car, I'm surprised it wasn't on that site I could rip that car apart and spit it out, just check out my timeslip data, lol. I can easily get sub 1 second 0-60 times, no sweat. Under 3 seconds to 100 too, and a sub 5 second 1/4 mile @ well over 200 mph. Also my car can hold 5.0+ g's on the skid pad, and that's in the wet! Pretty damned good for only 127hp, it's all about the VTEC..."
Haha, My Taurus SHO can do 0-60 in 6.7.. Get real. Get a V6.
"Depending on your parts, which I didn't look up, you are about $1000 worth of mods on your car and you are doing 8.5? You gotta drive that thing like you mean it."
If I had that much for my Lincoln Town Car I'd be pushing easily about 8.5 sec with a 4,300# car!
It's all about torque off the line, so if you can possibly find it with a 4 cylinder, supercharge or turbo will do just that.
Last edited by oohooh; Mar 16, 2004 at 03:52 AM.
Escaped Convict
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,450
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, California, US
Rep Power: 368 

ex 5spd can do 8 sec I believe.
and I think i can do 8 too with a good launch. thats stock too, btw. I/H that I've got doesnt really change anything imo.
better tires did help though. *shrug*
can you imagine those 2-3 second 0-60 supercars?
its like.. okay lets go. 1...2.... o, we're at 60 miles per hour now.
sheesh. insane.
and I think i can do 8 too with a good launch. thats stock too, btw. I/H that I've got doesnt really change anything imo.
better tires did help though. *shrug*
can you imagine those 2-3 second 0-60 supercars?
its like.. okay lets go. 1...2.... o, we're at 60 miles per hour now.
sheesh. insane.
(SnOwBoArDeR | FoReVeR)
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 0
From: Mission Viejo
Rep Power: 304 


Originally posted by CapYoda
ex 5spd can do 8 sec I believe.
and I think i can do 8 too with a good launch. thats stock too, btw. I/H that I've got doesnt really change anything imo.
better tires did help though. *shrug*
can you imagine those 2-3 second 0-60 supercars?
its like.. okay lets go. 1...2.... o, we're at 60 miles per hour now.
sheesh. insane.
ex 5spd can do 8 sec I believe.
and I think i can do 8 too with a good launch. thats stock too, btw. I/H that I've got doesnt really change anything imo.
better tires did help though. *shrug*
can you imagine those 2-3 second 0-60 supercars?
its like.. okay lets go. 1...2.... o, we're at 60 miles per hour now.
sheesh. insane.
Originally posted by oohooh
ok......everyone is too lazy to type such obvious information to your retarded comments so i guess being the newb that i am, i shall. What you're not comparing is the displacement to power ratio. We have 2.0 liter n/a motors that produce the kinda hp figures and 0-60 times that many domestic v8 motors would produce, not to mention their ridiculous 5k rpm redline. Taurus SHO running 6.7? lol...how many 6.7 runs will u be able to run with that taurus of yours before it needs to be towed to the shop? eh.... and btw 6.7 seconds is nothing to be impressive with 220 hp and 200 lbs of tq to work with. Needing tq off the line to launch? Launch at a more efficient rpm and you'll be right in the powerband after your launch.
ok......everyone is too lazy to type such obvious information to your retarded comments so i guess being the newb that i am, i shall. What you're not comparing is the displacement to power ratio. We have 2.0 liter n/a motors that produce the kinda hp figures and 0-60 times that many domestic v8 motors would produce, not to mention their ridiculous 5k rpm redline. Taurus SHO running 6.7? lol...how many 6.7 runs will u be able to run with that taurus of yours before it needs to be towed to the shop? eh.... and btw 6.7 seconds is nothing to be impressive with 220 hp and 200 lbs of tq to work with. Needing tq off the line to launch? Launch at a more efficient rpm and you'll be right in the powerband after your launch.
Originally posted by IMURMILK
umm what the hell v8's are u looking at running 9 sec 0-60s??????
umm what the hell v8's are u looking at running 9 sec 0-60s??????
i can do the 8th mile with my 2001 ls teg swapped crx in about 8.7 @ 83 mph. all motor without my head work and cams. it weighs about 2000 lbs with me in it, my light rims and a 11 gallons of premium gas. thats about 4.6 seconds 0-60 time according to some site. now i can do it in 4.3-4.4 sec, but i dunno what that is in the 8th mile. thats with all the work done to the head and massive tire spin. havent taken this worked head to the track yet tho.
I avg about 6.7 0-60
That was on a G-Tech meter on the side of the interstate
But according to that internet site posted eariler it should be 6.26 sec.
That was on a G-Tech meter on the side of the interstate
But according to that internet site posted eariler it should be 6.26 sec.
Last edited by Jhonda; Mar 17, 2004 at 06:06 PM.
" We have 2.0 liter n/a motors that produce the kinda hp figures and 0-60 times that many domestic v8 motors would produce, not to mention their ridiculous 5k rpm redline. Taurus SHO running 6.7? lol...how many 6.7 runs will u be able to run with that taurus of yours before it needs to be towed to the shop? eh.... and btw 6.7 seconds is nothing to be impressive with 220 hp and 200 lbs of tq to work with. Needing tq off the line to launch? Launch at a more efficient rpm and you'll be right in the powerband after your launch."
First of all, I know what kind of power you can and will get out of a motor if you put the money into it. Sounds like some of them are screamin'. It's mostly about the power to weight ratio, My only point with that was that you can build up a V8 in a big car to do just the same. Your comparing non-stock 4 cylinders to the power output of most domestic V8's. I don't know of a 4 cylinder that can put out more than 300 hp N/A, again, I just haven't seen any myself. I do know the cheap side of the domestic V8's, like the one in my Lincoln. 150 hp(ha ha, yeah I know) but a nice 270 lbs of torque to pull 4,500lbs to 0-60 in 10 sec. Fairly well for that little horsepower if you'd ask me.
Secondly, about my SHO. This 6.7 seconds 0-60 was in a 3,380lb car not including me in it, so the 220hp/200tq rating is not bad. This 3.0L can give about 200 lbs of torque from 2,500-7000 because of the 2 stage intake, so there is no need for more "off the line". It is all stock by the way. How many times can I do 6.7 before a tow you ask? I bounce it over redline almost every time I drive! Your interpretation of that was wrong, and I wouldn't take it to a shop being that I don't trust people with these engines. It's running solid at 141,000 miles and I hopes for lots more before my tranny goes..
First of all, I know what kind of power you can and will get out of a motor if you put the money into it. Sounds like some of them are screamin'. It's mostly about the power to weight ratio, My only point with that was that you can build up a V8 in a big car to do just the same. Your comparing non-stock 4 cylinders to the power output of most domestic V8's. I don't know of a 4 cylinder that can put out more than 300 hp N/A, again, I just haven't seen any myself. I do know the cheap side of the domestic V8's, like the one in my Lincoln. 150 hp(ha ha, yeah I know) but a nice 270 lbs of torque to pull 4,500lbs to 0-60 in 10 sec. Fairly well for that little horsepower if you'd ask me.
Secondly, about my SHO. This 6.7 seconds 0-60 was in a 3,380lb car not including me in it, so the 220hp/200tq rating is not bad. This 3.0L can give about 200 lbs of torque from 2,500-7000 because of the 2 stage intake, so there is no need for more "off the line". It is all stock by the way. How many times can I do 6.7 before a tow you ask? I bounce it over redline almost every time I drive! Your interpretation of that was wrong, and I wouldn't take it to a shop being that I don't trust people with these engines. It's running solid at 141,000 miles and I hopes for lots more before my tranny goes..
Originally posted by Jhonda
now listen I'm a Ford guy and all and I respect the hondas to.....But The Tortus SHO is a slow POS
now listen I'm a Ford guy and all and I respect the hondas to.....But The Tortus SHO is a slow POS
I avg about 6.7 0-60
That was on a G-Tech meter on the side of the interstate.
I said:
My SHO can do 0-60 in 6.7.
15.20qtr mile
I also did mine on the G-tech meter.
So sounds like your Focus needs to "focus" a little better because there is a 'stock' slow POS "Tortus" SHO keeping up. What does that tell you about your car?
I say thats all that taurus can push is 220 HP with v6 and the K20A Type R pushes 225 HP stock. So go take your First on recall day car to fords forums and talk about your recalls. BTW the SHO are a POS no wonder why they stoped making them.
Originally posted by K20A_Wanabe
I say thats all that taurus can push is 220 HP with v6 and the K20A Type R pushes 225 HP stock. So go take your First on recall day car to fords forums and talk about your recalls. BTW the SHO are a POS no wonder why they stoped making them.
I say thats all that taurus can push is 220 HP with v6 and the K20A Type R pushes 225 HP stock. So go take your First on recall day car to fords forums and talk about your recalls. BTW the SHO are a POS no wonder why they stoped making them.
ouch I hate when people think that there car is bad a$$. When there is always something faster and better car out there. You can never have the best car. All that matters is that you like your car it doesn't have to be fast. If you like your car because it's just fast you have a problem.
Freedom costs a Buck o'Five
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,406
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Rep Power: 0 










Originally posted by IMURMILK
**** a lingenfelter vette is a classic....no way I would ever sell that thing
**** a lingenfelter vette is a classic....no way I would ever sell that thing
Originally posted by K20A_Wanabe
I say thats all that taurus can push is 220 HP with v6 and the K20A Type R pushes 225 HP stock. So go take your First on recall day car to fords forums and talk about your recalls. BTW the SHO are a POS no wonder why they stoped making them.
I say thats all that taurus can push is 220 HP with v6 and the K20A Type R pushes 225 HP stock. So go take your First on recall day car to fords forums and talk about your recalls. BTW the SHO are a POS no wonder why they stoped making them.
yeah, at least Ford circled the problem..
The K20A Type R pushes 220 HP stock also.
You don't have to lie to kick it.
Lets see
K20A Type R-I4 220 HP reliable
Taurus SHO-V6 220 HP POS ford Did you get that recall ?
Here i'll help you to your Ford Forums.
Does no one like you there cause no one likes you here.
K20A Type R-I4 220 HP reliable
Taurus SHO-V6 220 HP POS ford Did you get that recall ?
Here i'll help you to your Ford Forums.
Does no one like you there cause no one likes you here.
Originally posted by SHOgoy
You said:
I avg about 6.7 0-60
That was on a G-Tech meter on the side of the interstate.
I said:
My SHO can do 0-60 in 6.7.
15.20qtr mile
I also did mine on the G-tech meter.
So sounds like your Focus needs to "focus" a little better because there is a 'stock' slow POS "Tortus" SHO keeping up. What does that tell you about your car?
You said:
I avg about 6.7 0-60
That was on a G-Tech meter on the side of the interstate.
I said:
My SHO can do 0-60 in 6.7.
15.20qtr mile
I also did mine on the G-tech meter.
So sounds like your Focus needs to "focus" a little better because there is a 'stock' slow POS "Tortus" SHO keeping up. What does that tell you about your car?
Sorry Jhonda, I meant I'm not that far behind you.
shoforum.com is where the sho is mostly discussed, but I read some of the stuff on here to learn more.
Oh yeah, the only recall that I know of on it was a rear SF mount that could get rusted if exposed to salty roads during winter time.
And lastly before I get anymore **** talking about an Ford SHO which is all you seem to know how to do, it doesn't doesn't have an actual Ford motor in it. If you read the earlier post it has a very reliable Yamaha racing engine, which can indeed live an easy life well into the 200,000s with everyday abuse and racing on weekends, if properly maintained. I think they tested it for 12 hours at 10000rpm or something.. anywho.. seems like it could be just as reliable as the new K20A Type R in a way, and it was made 15 years ago.
shoforum.com is where the sho is mostly discussed, but I read some of the stuff on here to learn more.
Oh yeah, the only recall that I know of on it was a rear SF mount that could get rusted if exposed to salty roads during winter time.
And lastly before I get anymore **** talking about an Ford SHO which is all you seem to know how to do, it doesn't doesn't have an actual Ford motor in it. If you read the earlier post it has a very reliable Yamaha racing engine, which can indeed live an easy life well into the 200,000s with everyday abuse and racing on weekends, if properly maintained. I think they tested it for 12 hours at 10000rpm or something.. anywho.. seems like it could be just as reliable as the new K20A Type R in a way, and it was made 15 years ago.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
EdGasket
6th Generation Civic 1996 - 2000
4
May 25, 2015 01:06 PM





