Celica's Are Fast!!!!!!!!!

Subscribe
Nov 23, 2003
  #31  
I'm not buyin that 13.9 for a second. That cars not even puttin 200hp to the wheels. lease:

You guys prooved nothing you still suck.
Nov 23, 2003
  #32  
funny my october 2000 scc issue gives it a 15.3 @91.6 mph, obviously hookin up well. it is also puttin down 162 whp. so give ti exhaust and intake. it still is far from a 14.5, lets not even mention the 13.9.
Nov 23, 2003
  #33  
Quote:
Originally posted by BAD-TSi
funny my october 2000 scc issue gives it a 15.3 @91.6 mph, obviously hookin up well. it is also puttin down 162 whp. so give ti exhaust and intake. it still is far from a 14.5, lets not even mention the 13.9.
wrd!
the celica gts sux, you people suck. you have no clue.

i'd love to find some jag claiming a 13.9 with intake and exhaust on a gts.
i'd **** on his hood and his face.

these cars are bitch cars. there hopeless

if you ever do get it to 13s it's game over! where are ya goin with it?

i'd love to stomp you're gay little gts. stock or modified. gutted or not.
and i'll do it full interior, with a passenger ******.

if you're anywhere near milwaukee it's worth my time to race you and make you cry.

gts suck, 7th gen civics suck, you people suck, this site sux.

you truly are gay. look how you swing from this celicagts guys nutz! gay!!!

that car gets owned by a integra type r stock to stock(FACT)
acura integra type r runs a 14.7 @ 95.2(fact)

lick my *****!!!
Nov 23, 2003
  #34  
Quote:
Originally posted by BAD-TSi
I'm not buyin that 13.9 for a second. That cars not even puttin 200hp to the wheels. lease:

You guys prooved nothing you still suck.
*sigh* Its called power to weight ratio.

As for the 15.3 @ 91.6 I think that was done when they did a 1/4 run without exceeding the redline. Redline is at 7800 but fuel cut off is at 8400. In order to land onto the second cam on the GT-S you have to shift right before the rev limiter. That’s why there is a difference in their 1/4 mile times.
Nov 23, 2003
  #35  
wow, mag racing. lets go by times ppl actually get, not numbers out of a magazine, when someone gets to drive the car for half a day they don't know it like an owner of the same car. just post slips! screw this but SCC says...
Nov 23, 2003
  #36  
Okay here ya go, Dan's 13.9 run

Nov 23, 2003
  #37  
Quote:
Originally posted by 04civicex
*sigh* Its called power to weight ratio.

As for the 15.3 @ 91.6 I think that was done when they did a 1/4 run without exceeding the redline. Redline is at 7800 but fuel cut off is at 8400. In order to land onto the second cam on the GT-S you have to shift right before the rev limiter. That’s why there is a difference in their 1/4 mile times.

it's called torque asswipe.

get some!
Nov 23, 2003
  #38  
Quote:
Originally posted by C2i0v0i1c
our cars stock can take a regular GT, but not a GT-S never been in one or raced one, but im pretty sure id hand it to one
Quote:
Originally posted by BAD-TSi
I've just read this entire thread and come to the conclusion that everyone here is an idiot!

read it again, my reply sounds pretty damn intelligent
Nov 23, 2003
  #39  
I love how little kids come on to this site and talk a bunch of sh*t. Not all of us on here drive Civics and not all of us are idiots. Personally, I drive a WRX and I do know my sh*t about many different types of cars. You my friends are idiots. Power to wieght ratio has a LOT to do with 1/4 mile times regarless of what you say. Torque does have quite a bit to do with times but if you have a heavy a$$ car, your high torque won't mean sh*t. So go play kids. Do some HEAVY detailed research on power to weight ratio then come back to this site when you are EDUCATED! Why come here and pick on poor 7th gen civics. Come play with a car more in your league. My WRX would love to play with your poorly made 4g63 powered Talon. Oh ya. To the kid with the Si. I'd love to race your oh so powerful B16a lease:, but I like to pick on cars that I'd have a hard time beating. Go play kids.
Nov 23, 2003
  #40  
^^^^

heh, i agree. i dont' have a civic either. i did. but not anymore. I'd also like to race the Si. hehe. and maybe the talon, but who knows what he has done to it. Highway pulls for me. from 50mph roll. LETS GO!
Nov 23, 2003
  #41  
^^^ I Know wht im talking abotu but i was just wondering bc 00celicagts6spd said he ran 14.5 stock and WRX's run wht like 14.2 stick so an auto would be liike 14.5 or a little more thats why i havent said a lot bc i decide to stay out of ****
Nov 23, 2003
  #42  
slammed01civ,

your wrx better have some heavy mods!

wrx do fairly well against me till we hit 3rd gear.
then what my BUILT B20VTEC does to them get pretty sick!
your 14.2 comes from a lauch. mine comes from power.
good luck on the launch, you're sure as hell gonna need it!

and nitehawk! wtf?
you got a intake! i'll tell ya what. my other car is a bone stock 94 integra ls. i'll smoke ya in that. it happens all across the country countless times daily.
but hey good luck on the miracle, you're sure as hell just gonna need it.
Nov 23, 2003
  #43  
Quote:
Originally posted by stockSi
.

yes u are so right

the total extent of ur intelligence
Nov 23, 2003
  #44  
Quote:
Originally posted by stockSi
wrd!
the celica gts sux, you people suck. you have no clue.

i'd love to find some jag claiming a 13.9 with intake and exhaust on a gts.
i'd **** on his hood and his face.

these cars are bitch cars. there hopeless

if you ever do get it to 13s it's game over! where are ya goin with it?

i'd love to stomp you're gay little gts. stock or modified. gutted or not.
and i'll do it full interior, with a passenger ******.

if you're anywhere near milwaukee it's worth my time to race you and make you cry.

gts suck, 7th gen civics suck, you people suck, this site sux.

you truly are gay. look how you swing from this celicagts guys nutz! gay!!!

that car gets owned by a integra type r stock to stock(FACT)
acura integra type r runs a 14.7 @ 95.2(fact)

lick my *****!!!
the fact that you are resorting to childish name calling and telling someone to do homosexual acts to you ("lick my *****") is a true sign your losing this battle and shows just how "smart" you really are. no one likes you here, no one wants you here. JUST LEAVE. you have done nothing to show you have just an ounce of intellegence. why did you come here in the first place? to show how fast you are against other cars who are slower? that right there shows you have ZERO smarts. your just another loser trying to look cool on the internet and you failed yet again....
Nov 23, 2003
  #45  
Quote:
Originally posted by SLAMMED01CIV
I love how little kids come on to this site and talk a bunch of sh*t. Not all of us on here drive Civics and not all of us are idiots. Personally, I drive a WRX and I do know my sh*t about many different types of cars. You my friends are idiots. Power to wieght ratio has a LOT to do with 1/4 mile times regarless of what you say. Torque does have quite a bit to do with times but if you have a heavy a$$ car, your high torque won't mean sh*t. So go play kids. Do some HEAVY detailed research on power to weight ratio then come back to this site when you are EDUCATED! Why come here and pick on poor 7th gen civics. Come play with a car more in your league. My WRX would love to play with your poorly made 4g63 powered Talon. Oh ya. To the kid with the Si. I'd love to race your oh so powerful B16a lease:, but I like to pick on cars that I'd have a hard time beating. Go play kids.

Allright Dumbshit!! According to the people on this board a Celica GTS would stomp you!! Does that sound like something that gonna happen?? I should hope not. So don't stick up for these people. Dumbass.

And as far as your WRX taking me?? Bring on the Boxer motor piece of peice of **** anytime **** face. And you better hope that porcelain trannied turd doesn't leave any gears lyin on the street when I'm done with you.
Nov 23, 2003
  #46  
Quote:
Originally posted by 18secQuaterMile
your just another loser trying to look cool on the internet and you failed yet again....
so make sure u wipe the sand out ur p**sy and run back to mommy, and tell her u were bullied at school today bc we sure taught u something
Nov 23, 2003
  #47  
Quote:
Originally posted by NitehawkVTEC
^^^^

heh, i agree. i dont' have a civic either. i did. but not anymore. I'd also like to race the Si. hehe. and maybe the talon, but who knows what he has done to it. Highway pulls for me. from 50mph roll. LETS GO!

What, does eveyone on this sight all of a sudden have different cars?? **** you man. Bring on your POS. I'll ****in run you, stop, roll, freeway, however you want it ********. Don't dare try to race my with your crusty Civic though. I'll go out and get a stock turbo and throw it on just to embarass you.


Don't go tellin me that you got an S2000 or something else gay. You better make up a pretty badass car to run against me.
Nov 23, 2003
  #48  
Quote:
Originally posted by BAD-TSi
You better make up a pretty badass car to run against me.
yeah becuz your eagle TSi is "all that" right.... lease:
Nov 23, 2003
  #49  
lol. too funny. I started with the civic and traded it in, after i decided i hated it. I'd run a Stock TSi anyday of the week. 14.9 with AWD, pssshhh. i'll do it from a dead stop or a roll.

And i'll be doing in in comfort. not in some 10 year old car that was cheap to begin with. I could have 10 TSi's if i wanted.
Nov 23, 2003
  #50  
all this sh*t talkin by BAD TSi and stock si, means two things, they have nothing better to do and they really dont have anything fast in there drives except for those 3 cylinder metros
Nov 23, 2003
  #51  
bad tsi and/or stocksi = chrissy's return? LOL
Nov 23, 2003
  #52  
It's true. go to a forum where people actually have fast cars. and there is NO **** talking. but a TSi isn't expensive or anything. hah. you can get em for 3 grand. so he might have a TSi. he's still a huge idiot. haa.
Nov 23, 2003
  #53  
i still think he/she has a metro
Nov 23, 2003
  #54  
I'm not concerned with how much my car costs. This is racing son, not a ****in Barret Jackson auction. Maybe you wanna reffer to the blue book value of John Shepards 8.75 sec 91 TSi AWD street class champion car, but your cars more expencive so your cooler right?? Prolly not. So STFU about how mutch whats worth. You guys really sound like homos when you say **** like that.
Nov 23, 2003
  #55  
Bad TSI/Stock SI.........he has an alter ego with nothing better to do.........go **** urself !!!!!!!
Nov 23, 2003
  #56  
BAD TSi and StockSI are the same person. nuff said. haha
Subscribe