V-tec or TURB0
Thread Starter
Registered!!
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: San Fransico, California, US
Rep Power: 0 
V-tec or TURB0
I bought an LX coupe for 14k. The EX costs $3000 more. Do you guys think it worths to get an EX instead of an LX. I know the V-Tec on a EX isn't as powerful as the the one in SI and it only gives you 12hp more. Would you use the 3 thousand dollars on the aftermarket turb0? Just wondering...[IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/IMG]
End Bringer
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,254
Likes: 0
From: Fort Fatima, Florida, US
Rep Power: 0 go with the turb0, the lx is lower compressed, thus better for a turb0, and it's not a hard choice, very obvious.. 3000 for 12 more hp? or 3200 for 60hp?
got this word baning game is pissing me off!
got this word baning game is pissing me off!
If you really want a fast car with turb0, you should decide on a 300ZX twin turb0, or a Supra Turb0, maybe even a 96 MR2 Turb0. That way with those models you do not have to spend money on mods to go faster just money on looks. I also like the looks of the Supra and MR2. Anyone else with a opinion ??
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rep Power: 0 I would have to go with the V-TECH power
12HP is alot dont under estimate the power of V-TECH dude
and who said V-TECH is not powerful on the EX?
V-TECH should make you fly like a motha fvcker
haha jk
IMO go with the Turb0 its more bang for the buck(if thats what you want)
12HP is alot dont under estimate the power of V-TECH dude
and who said V-TECH is not powerful on the EX?
V-TECH should make you fly like a motha fvcker
haha jk
IMO go with the Turb0 its more bang for the buck(if thats what you want)
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
From: calgary, Alberta, Canada
Rep Power: 0 << WTFBjTCH say it with me VTEC not vtech >>
well no sh*t
you clearly did not get the joke[IMG]i/expressions/laugh2.gif[/IMG]
and if wanted to sound like a smart a@@ you dont
Registered!!
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: San Jose / San Diego, California, US
Rep Power: 0 are they going to have the turb0s for the LX? from what i know, they said that it was gonna be for EX only. but im not sure.[IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/IMG]
Thread Starter
Registered!!
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: San Fransico, California, US
Rep Power: 0 If you guys gotta choose one more time, would you buy EX or LX? Or buy an LX and use the money (Less than 3000) to fix it up nice. Oh...one more thing. do you have the same situation that people driving a subaru or whatever always try to push you or speed up rite next to you on purpose? I mean WTF? They paid hella more for their ride like double price of our civics. You see how they react through the window?[IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-puke.gif[/IMG]
Registered!!
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: omaha, Nebraska, US
Rep Power: 0 << If you really want a fast car with turb0, you should decide on a 300ZX twin turb0, or a Supra Turb0, maybe even a 96 MR2 Turb0. That way with those models you do not have to spend money on mods to go faster just money on looks. I also like the looks of the Supra and MR2. Anyone else with a opinion ?? >>
I had a 93 mr2. I loved that car it looked great and it was a lot of fun to drive. I didnt get the turbo because I was 19 and the insurance was just crazy period.
Registered!!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Hicksville, New York, US
Rep Power: 0 << civic honda turbo
>>Civic honda turbo
look i can do it too[IMG]i/expressions/moon.gif[/IMG] seriously though i went for the ex casue of the sunroof and the fact that there are more aftermarket options 
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
izdman
Archive - Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
1
May 19, 2015 03:43 PM
