Originally Posted by screwface

it takes 50-70% more electrical energy to perform electrolysis than the thermal energy gained from combustion of the final product. when the electrical energy used to create that hydrogen is produced by the running of your engine (i.e. burning gasoline,) there is consequently a net energy loss. how then, do you propose to be improving mileage?

what really gets my goat is that the people supporting this HHO crap can't explain things in mathematical terms, only fancy buzzword and acronyms like "HHO." the people that say it won't work have the law of physics on their side; the people that say it will work have the word of an internet scam artist and so far no mathematical evidence to explain to me what car company manufactures an alternator that can compensate for such an incredibly inefficient process.

Originally Posted by drunkenmagnum

It doesnt work. If you can prove otherwise I will eat those words. I have found NO evidence of a true working system out there that does what the system claims it can do. All you are doing is putting hundreds of dollars of worthless mods into your car when that same amount could just go towards the gas you are trying to save on. If anything you are hurting the engine with this THEORY that has no FACTS backing it up. While I admire those that try and invent systems that will better efficency, this is not one of them.