Rep Power: 0

well like the title says I took my car in today to get tuned and dyno'd. Here is what parts I ran with:

K20a Type R Motor
Toda Race Header
Greddy evo2 exhaust
Injen Cold Air Intake
Unorthodox Racing Pulleys
Hondata IMG and K-Pro

I dyno'd at 217.3 whp and 160wtq

 
Rep Power: 362

interesting ...

do you have the dyno graph?

 
Rep Power: 812

that seems really low. did they tune the hondata?

 
Rep Power: 0

Yes they tuned it.. but remember I am arizona, not so cal.. Yes I have the graph, but I have to scan it first.. i will do that today.

 
Rep Power: 362

according to yahoo, the elevation of phoenix, az is only about 1100 ft.

at sea level, your dyno should be right at 220 whp, assuming that it is a dynojet dyno.

 
Rep Power: 812

ah what was the temperature like?

 
Rep Power: 0

nice stuff man

 
Rep Power: 403

what kind of dyno?

 
Rep Power: 0

not sure what kind of dyno it was.. i can find out.. the temp was 73 degrees.. something could be wrong with my car.. cuz i hoping for about 225

 
Rep Power: 362

217-220 whp seems right for those mods.

you could probably gain a couple more whp by reducing the weight of your rims ;P

peak whp isn't always as important as the midrange ;P

 
Rep Power: 335

could have been a mustang dyno i hear they are horribly inaccurate

 
Rep Power: 0

no this dyno is strictly used for hondas and acuras. Yeah my midrange power is insane with the toda header. I will have to get a copy of my graph overlayed with my friends graph.. I will get it today.

 
Rep Power: 0

i'm gonna move this to FI for further disscussion...

 
Rep Power: 309

Very nice #'s, congrats

 
Rep Power: 293

I think the numbers are pretty good.

 
Rep Power: 262

i was honselty expecting more HP but i dont know dyno sheet would be nice

 
Rep Power: 281

that's funny....i think he meant type as in dynojet, mustang, etc...

 
Rep Power: 280

If the header is for mid range, then top end will suffer, so #'s looks on par.

 
Rep Power: 255

Why are you only running 14.9?

 
Rep Power: 295

The numbers look pretty good but your 1/4 mile time and trap speed is terrible for having 220 hp to the wheels.

 
Rep Power: 338

same here!

 
Rep Power: 0

probably some traction issues

 
Rep Power: 295

I dunno, a 94 mph trap is still pretty low. You shouldn't lose too much trap speed if your spinning unless its SEVERE spinning haha.

 
Rep Power: 0

the 14.9 was untuned... i havent ran it with it tuned..

 
Rep Power: 279

Yeah i was running a 14.78@98.8MPH so 94, isnt to far off. That was just pure type R power though. *with mad traction problems* Now who knows what my car will do lol. Or his for that matter lol

 
Rep Power: 370

What was your 60ft time when you ran the 1/4? The reason why he ran a 14.9 could have been because of poor traction.

btw... those are good numbers but considering your mods they seem a little bit low.

 
Rep Power: 362

his traction probably wasn't that bad considering his trap speed was 94 mph.

transformed had a tough time with traction since he ran a 14.7, but with a 98.8 mph trap. that trap is probably good for around low 14's

 
Rep Power: 279

Yeah i know i did, i would alway have a good reaction time, like .1## but then my 60 fts would be between 2.5 - 2.9. And i would try fethering the clutch no luck there eaither. Just i really think the track i was at sucked!

 
Rep Power: 329

could have been track, tires i guess....


... or maybe you need to do a little more weight reduction on the right foot