View Poll Results: 02 Mustang GT 5Spd.vs. 02 WRX 5Spd.
Stang- Its got the balls
21
28.00%
WRX- Turbo'ed AWD, Nuff said
54
72.00%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll
Who do you think won?
01-14-2005
#31
Registered!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Age: 40
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by Spider883
There both slow and ugly .. enough said 
(trying not to take it personal...
)hey, to each his own...
01-14-2005
#32
Registered!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Age: 40
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by SLAMMED01CIV
Where are you getting your stats about Evo's not having good top end stock?? They have great top end actually. Oh and the Evo is WORLDS faster than a regular WRX. Not a tad. An Evo and an 04 STi are about equal with the STi barely edging the Evo out. The 05 STi's are tad slower for some weird reason though and the Evo slowly works one. An Evo will walk a newer GT from a roll and a dig. I've been in my buddies Evo countless number of times racing newer GT's. Same result everytime. Evo walks away slowly and keeps walking. From a roll that is. From a dig it's not even a close race. Just for the record........A well driven Evo will break high 12's all day long in the 1/4.
no problem, ill do a full exhaust, put some gears in the rear, suspension mods, and a few other bolt on stuff. im not looking to beat him, or anyone really. im looking for a nice looking DD thats fairly quick, decent handling, and fairly comfortable. if i can beat some quick cars, all the better. but if i ever beat that Evo, i think that'll be quick enough for me.
01-14-2005
#33
Registered!!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida, US
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 261
Originally Posted by Spider883
There both slow and ugly .. enough said
01-14-2005
#34
My SL65 rim, because a rim is all I can afford
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medina Ohio
Age: 44
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 296 
Originally Posted by Blainestang
Am I missing something, because stock vs. stock, Z vs. GT is a driver's race. Period.
01-14-2005
#35
My SL65 rim, because a rim is all I can afford
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medina Ohio
Age: 44
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 296 Or if money is not an object, buy a turbo M3, no matter what an EVO stock or not will not keep up witht that M3 (the EVO may get the standing jump, but that will fall quikly). Wish I had that kind of money
01-14-2005
#36
Registered!!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida, US
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 261
Originally Posted by Jrfish007
Uhmmm, I don't think anyone ever brough up a 350Z? We where talking about a WRX vs a GT and then how an EVO would kill a GT, except I noted that the stock EVO's have a kinda bad top end. If want to know what a great top end is, ride a M3 or Viper, these car pull hard at 150MPH. Yeah I know an EVO cost and 1/3 of these cars, and that you really can not get more bang for you buck than an EVO gives you, but it is still a 30K car, it will have it's limiations, it's just that you have to spend 3 times as much to move up to the next level of performance cars.
01-15-2005
#37
Registered!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Age: 40
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Blainestang
.....Anywho, I've driven a car with as much or more top end than the M3, a stock '03 Cobra.
ive driven one as well(before i owned my GT) and i was quite impressed when i could spin the tires and get 'er sideways.......................................... ...........at 35mph, in 3rd gear, at 2000 rpm! i almost wet myself! 
that was awesome!
01-16-2005
#40
Registered!!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida, US
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 261
Originally Posted by lilravingmatt
LOL... the poll for the wrx wins but all the comments is for stang haha
01-16-2005
#42
Registered!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: baton rouge, la...lsu student!!!!
Age: 40
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 i'm not gonna waste my time and argue... go look up the specs for both, a wrx is faster than a mustang gt in the qt. its a proven fact. wrx low 14's mustang gt mid 14s.
01-16-2005
#43
Registered!!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida, US
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 261
Originally Posted by solo_rider
i'm not gonna waste my time and argue... go look up the specs for both, a wrx is faster than a mustang gt in the qt. its a proven fact. wrx low 14's mustang gt mid 14s.
01-16-2005
#44
O RLY
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Age: 44
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 377
Originally Posted by solo_rider
i'm not gonna waste my time and argue... go look up the specs for both, a wrx is faster than a mustang gt in the qt. its a proven fact. wrx low 14's mustang gt mid 14s.
the mustang GT 99+ can run high 13's stock. that's a half second faster in the 1/4 mile, which is like 7-8 car lengths at the finish line.
so from a roll or a stop, a mustang GT is faster than a WRX, period.
01-17-2005
#45
My SL65 rim, because a rim is all I can afford
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medina Ohio
Age: 44
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 296
Originally Posted by solo_rider
i'm not gonna waste my time and argue... go look up the specs for both, a wrx is faster than a mustang gt in the qt. its a proven fact. wrx low 14's mustang gt mid 14s.
01-18-2005
#48
My SL65 rim, because a rim is all I can afford
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medina Ohio
Age: 44
Posts: 4,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 296
Originally Posted by EternalVTEC
ill have to post up our timeslips when we go to an actual track
01-18-2005
#49
Registered!!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida, US
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 261 I can't believe this thread is still going. Everyone who knows what they are talking about is in agreement that the Mustang SHOULD win in the 1/4. GT's run high 13's at best, and WRX's low 14's. Also, from a roll, the GT should walk away.
01-19-2005
#50
Registered!!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Age: 40
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Blainestang
I can't believe this thread is still going. Everyone who knows what they are talking about is in agreement that the Mustang SHOULD win in the 1/4. GT's run high 13's at best, and WRX's low 14's. Also, from a roll, the GT should walk away.
sorry, i keep bringing it back from the dead......
IBTL
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Supamann
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
6
08-31-2015 02:14 PM
Deeup511
I.C.E. (Audio) & Electrical Upgrades
3
08-30-2015 04:48 AM
totravska
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
5
08-30-2015 12:02 AM
JetsterDajet
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
4
08-15-2015 08:07 AM
EM_WON
Suspension Performance Modifications
4
07-22-2015 06:49 PM
