Rep Power: 0

Here I found these on www.superhonda.com. Thought I would share.

 
Rep Power: 375

looks good to me, not really feeling the back end as much as this gen tho

 
Rep Power: 0

the back end looks like the last gen of the rx-7, sorta

 
Rep Power: 0

The bottom left corner of the picture has "V6" embedded with some other garbage. I've heard rumors of other possible engines. I also highly doubt that spoiler would make it into production. Acura represents more of an upscale and classy image.

 
Rep Power: 0

I don't think that the NSX is meant to be classy and upscale, I think it is meant to say HEY LOOK AT ME BURN YOUR *** INTO THE GROUND

 
Rep Power: 0

couldnt of said that any better

 
Rep Power: 0

I agree thats how we look at it. But the target buyer for an NSX has to have a pretty big check book. That usually means an "upscale" demographic.

 
Rep Power: 0

or a drug dealer that doesn't want a H2

 
Rep Power: 0

...or a spoiled rich kid (jealousy mode on- stupid rich kids - end jealousy)

 
Rep Power: 0

Haha! I hear yah.

 
Rep Power: 424

The *** looks like a Ferrari 360 with a wing.... But I'm likin' it.






Someone please tell me it has a V8 or Turbos or something fun.... If nothing else, a 320 HP V6.

 
Rep Power: 0

I'm agreeing with the spoiled rich kids .............. kick em all in the nuts

 
Rep Power: 0

Firstly, the NSX is a Honda first, and is shipped over to North America and has Acura badges slapped on secondly. Honda wants it to have an aggressive look, I don't really think they care if it looks classy or not.

And I really hope the rumours of the detuned 3.0 L V10 Formula One engine comes true. Even if they detuned it to like 10,000 rpm or 15,000 rpm, it would still be well over 500 hp.

 
Rep Power: 0

The sad thing is that for the price of the nsx you can get something a hell of alot faster if you are going for speed

 
Rep Power: 0

When the NSX was originally released it was credited with "waking up" the super car industry. Horsepower figures like that (and some impressive torque) would do it all over again.

 
Rep Power: 334

I saw an NSX for the first time in real life the other day. It's not as large as I thought it looked. It's like a rectangular pancake. It's not big and bulky looking like the boxy-type mustangs. I've seen pictures but I always thought it would be huge.

 
Rep Power: 0

werd.......and IMO it's not that nice looking, to each their own though.

 
Rep Power: 338

From that picture, I can say it's an NSX-R..... 3.7 Liter V6. The current NSX-R uses a 3.5 Liter V6, a variation of that gem, C32B. I think the wing will make it into production, in Japan atleast..... HOT

 
Rep Power: 393

Looks like a 240 from the back

 
Rep Power: 0

im likin that, the front looks nice, and the back end isnt too bad

 
Rep Power: 365

I bet it doesn't have a V10. But I do think it'd sell a bit more if it had more than 300hp. I personally don't want 290hp for 90 grand. Maybe that's just me though.

 
Rep Power: 0

oh yum..i like the new design

 
Rep Power: 0

the spoiler looks awesome, but yeah the rear end looks "BAD"

 
Rep Power: 0

sorry guys that pic is a photochopp.. its already been discussed at vtec.net.. they chopped it off this nsx-r pic

http://www.vtec.net/calendar/

 
Rep Power: 0

^ red X
well still a sweet car

 
Rep Power: 0

Here are some pics that I dug up. Remember, manufacturers typically carry styling traits throughout the car lineup.


This one is styled like the RSX:



And this one like the S2000:

 
Rep Power: 312

if you want a nsx go buy one from the early 90s they are down to 30,000 and you can put twin turbos on that sucker and it will be one bad ****