Lambo vs. Cobra
that Lambo owned that Cobra. And the cobra's r not push overs either. Unless the other car costs 200K. But it did hang with it for a couple of seconds until the Lambo hit the next gear then it looked like a Civ passing a Cavy. (hahaha I hate cavaliers)
Originally Posted by midnightblueEX
Doesnt the Lambo have like twice the HP as a Cobra?
Complete ownage... the Lambo must be a bit undderated with the horsepowers... the Gallardo has a 500hp V10, but the guy in the video said it dyno'd 496whp?
EDIT: Im confused.. So the Cobra dyno'd 496whp? that complete *** beating does not compute.
I'd say aerodynamics came into effect a tad.
Cobra = flying brick
Lambo = supercar
Plus the fact the Cobra was right up there with in terms of weight, not so surprising results.
What is surprising is the fact it's a quality race video with lambo boys.
EDIT: Im confused.. So the Cobra dyno'd 496whp? that complete *** beating does not compute.
I'd say aerodynamics came into effect a tad.
Cobra = flying brick
Lambo = supercar
Plus the fact the Cobra was right up there with in terms of weight, not so surprising results.
What is surprising is the fact it's a quality race video with lambo boys.
Originally Posted by NAstage2
Complete ownage... the Lambo must be a bit undderated with the horsepowers... the Gallardo has a 500hp V10, but the guy in the video said it dyno'd 496whp?
EDIT: Im confused.. So the Cobra dyno'd 496whp? that complete *** beating does not compute.
I'd say aerodynamics came into effect a tad.
Cobra = flying brick
Lambo = supercar
Plus the fact the Cobra was right up there with in terms of weight, not so surprising results.
What is surprising is the fact it's a quality race video with lambo boys.
EDIT: Im confused.. So the Cobra dyno'd 496whp? that complete *** beating does not compute.
I'd say aerodynamics came into effect a tad.
Cobra = flying brick
Lambo = supercar
Plus the fact the Cobra was right up there with in terms of weight, not so surprising results.
What is surprising is the fact it's a quality race video with lambo boys.
Nevermined i watched it again the cobra dynoed at 496 i believe, i believe the guy in the cobra also says he has no traction, so i dunno.
Last edited by ACURAwerx; Aug 1, 2005 at 10:02 PM.
Originally Posted by ACURAwerx
I was confused bout that too, he said the lambo had an exhaust and dynoed at 496, but online it says the gallardo has between 493-500 hp. Does exhaust had that much power on a v10? and he said the cobra was far from stock.
Nevermined i watched it again the cobra dynoed at 496 i believe, i believe the guy in the cobra also says he has no traction, so i dunno.
Nevermined i watched it again the cobra dynoed at 496 i believe, i believe the guy in the cobra also says he has no traction, so i dunno.
no traction from a roll, idk..
Originally Posted by CuRiOuSfIsH
looking at that, the cars are at 2 totally different HP levels.......
Originally Posted by ACURAwerx
the cobra has more horse power than the gallardo. So i guess the gallardo has better gearing and better aero dynamics? Shouldn't a rear wheel drive car be quicker than a 4 wheel drive car from a roll?
Originally Posted by NAstage2
No, it didnt. probably. ABSOLUTLY NOT. Dont buy into that ricer myth.
In general... 4WD gets off the line fastest because it uses all four wheels for maximum traction, but during acceleration, weight shifts to the rear, wasting part of the power a 4WD sends to the front wheels, so RWD is better the rest of the way.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dave88LX
Electrical
15
May 28, 2020 08:31 PM
jordan1794
8th & 9th Generation Civic 2006 - 2015
0
Jun 11, 2015 09:14 PM
Wild Cranker
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
1
May 19, 2015 06:10 PM







