Write Off
Originally Posted by cosmo
Sorry to hear about that, total losses suck but at least you're happy in the end. Can you find me some power side folding mirrors if you live in the UK? Please..
Originally Posted by Brill
he said it wasnt his fault, and it was the lesser of 2 evils at the time of the accident.
if you weren't there, you can't talk sh*t about it.
dan_11477: congrats on the lude, they're sweet cars.
if you weren't there, you can't talk sh*t about it.
dan_11477: congrats on the lude, they're sweet cars.
Originally Posted by Tinman
My dad had a choice of dying in a head-on collision or crashing his car to the right, into another parked car, bouncing IT up into the neighbors yard.
The other driver was distracted and speeding up the wrong side of the road. He and my dad met on the crest of a hill, so neither could see the other beforehand. The lesser of the 2 evils was my dad wrecking into a parked car instead of a head-on. No one was hurt.
Sooo..... things happen. Don't automatically judge someone.
The other driver was distracted and speeding up the wrong side of the road. He and my dad met on the crest of a hill, so neither could see the other beforehand. The lesser of the 2 evils was my dad wrecking into a parked car instead of a head-on. No one was hurt.
Sooo..... things happen. Don't automatically judge someone.
OK guys ease off, lets get some things straight.
1) the road I crashed on is completely different to the 1 i was doing 150 on.
The road i was doing 150 on is a motorway, it has crash barriers and everything and no houses and i could clearly see right up the road.
The road i crashed on was a single carriageway country road out of town, it had a 60mph limit and i was doing 40mph when I crashed.
2) I only mentioned street racing earlier because because some freak on here was getting all "holier than thou" and having a go at me when he himself had made posts about him street racing, something which imho is worse than going over the speed limit.
3)Why should having a crash stop me driving fast now, I didn't crash because I was speeding. You know what they say about falling off a horse.
4) I'm not really that bothered what you hypocritical yanks think of me and the original post should of just said "ha ha i don't have a shitty 7th gen anymore I have a 2.2 vtec prelude!"
1) the road I crashed on is completely different to the 1 i was doing 150 on.
The road i was doing 150 on is a motorway, it has crash barriers and everything and no houses and i could clearly see right up the road.
The road i crashed on was a single carriageway country road out of town, it had a 60mph limit and i was doing 40mph when I crashed.
2) I only mentioned street racing earlier because because some freak on here was getting all "holier than thou" and having a go at me when he himself had made posts about him street racing, something which imho is worse than going over the speed limit.
3)Why should having a crash stop me driving fast now, I didn't crash because I was speeding. You know what they say about falling off a horse.
4) I'm not really that bothered what you hypocritical yanks think of me and the original post should of just said "ha ha i don't have a shitty 7th gen anymore I have a 2.2 vtec prelude!"
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas, US
Rep Power: 0 





Originally Posted by Brill
im not saying who was to blame... that's not my place. he said its not his fault. as far as im concerned he's the only one involved in this thread who is qualified to make that determination. im simply pointing out that maybe others shouldn't be talking to this guy as though they are the judge jury & executioner.
I am qualified enough to say it was his fault unless there was another car coming at him. But you never know he could have been drinking or just being careless. The fact that he was only going 40 in a 60 is the part that makes me think there is more he isn't telling us.
Originally Posted by Master
I am qualified enough to say it was his fault unless there was another car coming at him. But you never know he could have been drinking or just being careless. The fact that he was only going 40 in a 60 is the part that makes me think there is more he isn't telling us.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,604
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas, US
Rep Power: 0 





^^^^^I am not trying to fight with you. I have my conclusions you have yours. Once he actually tells us what happened then we will know who had the right one lol. But so far he hasn't said anything about another car in his lane. Or an animal in the way or something. **** if there was an animal he could have stopped if he saw but he may have not been paying attention. He might have been stoned. So while he keeps dancing around the reason he ran into a my conclusions are he is trying to make up a reason why because he doesn't want to look like a dumba$$.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 30,677
Likes: 1
From: Dallas, PA
Rep Power: 607 










Originally Posted by dan_11477
2) I only mentioned street racing earlier because because some freak on here was getting all "holier than thou" and having a go at me when he himself had made posts about him street racing, something which imho is worse than going over the speed limit.
anywayz, me street racing = 50 mph.....u doing 150 is alot worse
Originally Posted by dan_11477
4) I'm not really that bothered what you hypocritical yanks think of me and the original post should of just said "ha ha i don't have a shitty 7th gen anymore I have a 2.2 vtec prelude!"
you may have a 2.2 vtec lude, but i would still beat u
Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
you then came to his defense (as if you have some hidden knowlwdge):MREEZYSMRS: the accident which destroyed his civic didnt happen on the empty motorway... it happened elsewhere, evidently the road had houses on or near it.
he took his new prelude up to 150mph on an empty motorway at 3:00am
he is explaining himself clearly imho.
he took his new prelude up to 150mph on an empty motorway at 3:00am
he is explaining himself clearly imho.
Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
again, you defend the house murderer:
im not saying who was to blame... that's not my place. he said its not his fault. as far as im concerned he's the only one involved in this thread who is qualified to make that determination. im simply pointing out that maybe others shouldn't be talking to this guy as though they are the judge jury & executioner.
im not saying who was to blame... that's not my place. he said its not his fault. as far as im concerned he's the only one involved in this thread who is qualified to make that determination. im simply pointing out that maybe others shouldn't be talking to this guy as though they are the judge jury & executioner.
Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
basically, you are assuming that the guy who hit the house (it must have jumped out of nowhere... I hate when that happens!) and says it's not his fault, is correct.
Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
Boy, it's gonna be fun when you have kids! LMAO... Yes daddy, I put the puppy in the microwave, but it's not MY FAULT he exploded.
Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
Obviously, you are the ignorant one. Only a fool believes a BS story like this and then backs the guys' *** like he's his long lost butt buddy. 

Originally Posted by MREEZYSMRS
So, Master was right in questioning the story about not being fully told, he was right about it being this guys fault and he was right about your poor use of grammar. 

Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 28,226
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey, New Jersey, US
Rep Power: 583 










hey brill, why dont you just put the shovel down and stop digging a hole for yourself. even the dumba$$ that hit the house isnt defending himself...you have any idea why that is??? just let it go man.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
MamaBear2015
7th Generation Civic 2001 - 2005
2
Sep 7, 2015 06:00 PM
slikor
Wheels, Tires & Brakes Modifications
2
Jun 25, 2002 11:42 AM




