Fastest 0-60 car
Registered!!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, Louisiana, US
Rep Power: 0 
go to roadandtrack.com to read about the Bugatti EB16-4 Veryon. It has an 8 liter 16-cylinder engine with 4 turbos. has 1001 bhp and 922 lb-ft torque. it goes 0-186 mph in 14 seconds and has a top speed of 252 mph. NOW THATS A CAR. The only problem - it has a base retail price of 1 million bucks.
I <3 my Evo
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles (right by UCLA)
Rep Power: 0 
there is no point trying to beat ignorance out of people, so yeah, its 2.6 fools.
the bugatti info, however, is correct. i love the veyron.
the bugatti info, however, is correct. i love the veyron.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 400 
2.6? for what car? who said that?
Are people getting confused? The mclaren F1 is the fastest 0-60 production car at 3.1 seconds. If someone said 2.6 then I dont know what they are talkin about.
edit: ah i see.... he said the 94 F1 hit 2.6....???
I think they are off on some of their times. That web site seems to have some inaccurate data.
I would think twice about a website that has the S2000 at 14.5 in the 1/4 mile, and the Neon SRT4 at 5.3 for a 0-60 (haha). The SRT4 is marked 5.3 0-60, yet an LS1 f-body is 5.4? haha. And 13.9 1/4 mile on the F-body. These people are all over the board on their times.
Yea, we'll chalk that up to incorrect data.
Are people getting confused? The mclaren F1 is the fastest 0-60 production car at 3.1 seconds. If someone said 2.6 then I dont know what they are talkin about.
edit: ah i see.... he said the 94 F1 hit 2.6....???
I think they are off on some of their times. That web site seems to have some inaccurate data.
I would think twice about a website that has the S2000 at 14.5 in the 1/4 mile, and the Neon SRT4 at 5.3 for a 0-60 (haha). The SRT4 is marked 5.3 0-60, yet an LS1 f-body is 5.4? haha. And 13.9 1/4 mile on the F-body. These people are all over the board on their times.
Yea, we'll chalk that up to incorrect data.
I <3 my Evo
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles (right by UCLA)
Rep Power: 0 Originally posted by S2000man01
Are people getting confused? The mclaren F1 is the fastest 0-60 production car at 3.1 seconds. If someone said 2.6 then I dont know what they are talkin about.
edit: ah i see.... he said the 94 F1 hit 2.6....???
I think they are off on some of their times. That web site seems to have some inaccurate data.
Are people getting confused? The mclaren F1 is the fastest 0-60 production car at 3.1 seconds. If someone said 2.6 then I dont know what they are talkin about.
edit: ah i see.... he said the 94 F1 hit 2.6....???
I think they are off on some of their times. That web site seems to have some inaccurate data.
Registered!!
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Rep Power: 0 i'd take an enzo over a mclaren f1 or veyron. depending on the different magz the enzo either slightly beats out or loses to the mclaren in acceleration, but has much better handling. and the veyron is going to basically be a superexotic muscle car. 4000 lbs or more means it wont be able to handle all that well...and it might seem funny coming from a supra owner but driving isnt all about the 1320.
Registered!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio, US
Rep Power: 0 cracka and nofriends, you two spend to much of your time on theis site. i see all them post numbers, that is freakin crazy! jeez! ya'll need to go take care of business if ya know what i mean
Thread Starter
Cracka
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 0
From: Boise, Idaho, US
Rep Power: 0 Originally posted by philsep36
cracka and nofriends, you two spend to much of your time on theis site. i see all them post numbers, that is freakin crazy! jeez! ya'll need to go take care of business if ya know what i mean
cracka and nofriends, you two spend to much of your time on theis site. i see all them post numbers, that is freakin crazy! jeez! ya'll need to go take care of business if ya know what i mean
Registered!!
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 0 Originally posted by 97SupraT78
i'd take an enzo over a mclaren f1 or veyron. depending on the different magz the enzo either slightly beats out or loses to the mclaren in acceleration, but has much better handling. and the veyron is going to basically be a superexotic muscle car. 4000 lbs or more means it wont be able to handle all that well...and it might seem funny coming from a supra owner but driving isnt all about the 1320.
i'd take an enzo over a mclaren f1 or veyron. depending on the different magz the enzo either slightly beats out or loses to the mclaren in acceleration, but has much better handling. and the veyron is going to basically be a superexotic muscle car. 4000 lbs or more means it wont be able to handle all that well...and it might seem funny coming from a supra owner but driving isnt all about the 1320.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
usajags84
6th Generation Civic 1996 - 2000
15
Aug 19, 2015 03:12 AM
JjAnGPeETuL
General Automotive Discussion
4
Nov 8, 2001 06:37 AM
