Rep Power: 0

http://picasaweb.google.com/11564452...87794894577442

 
Rep Power: 214

Yupp

 
Rep Power: 511

I've definitely seen worse.. But @ the uniwiper.

 
Rep Power: 0

is it a 93?

 
Rep Power: 0

Haha i was curious to see if it really looked riced out being that i might buy it. Its not a typical ricer with just exterior modifications and a over sized exhaust. It's a 94 honda si and these are the modifications on it. Its ready to drop a turbo in it.

2000 swaped b18b1(108xxxkms) with b16 tranny --ported head with stage 2 brian crowler cams,skunk2 duel valve springs and ti retainers
ajustable cam gears
new skunk2 strut tower bar
msd ign
2.5 catback
b/m short shifter
chipped ecu

 
Rep Power: 194

peoples idea for "rice" are all different. I'd say it is just cause I cant stand body kits or crazy hoods like that. But thats just my opinion.

 
Rep Power: 230

yeah the bodykit kills it. Otherwise it's not bad.

 
Rep Power: 0

Well i was planning on putting a lip kit on it and take the body kit off of course and evetually put coilovers on it.

 
Rep Power: 0

At least the body kit isn't chipped to **** and a different color.

 
Rep Power: 0

yeah i'd definitely consider it rice, but it's not too bad at all.
i actually personally think it looks pretty cool, and cleaner than most hondas with a bodykit, albeit still rice.
imo if it had a stock bumper and lip it would looks really good, not too crazy about the hood but theres much worse

 
Rep Power: 0

Yeah personally i thought it was tastefully done but i decided im not getting it because he gutted the back seat interior.

 
Rep Power: 0

not rice at all, its a clean build that isnt over the top. its a very modest bodykit