ex 5spd vs. rsx base 5spd
Originally posted by mad_stylz36
It doesn't matter with the weight difference. The rsx base would get it every time. 5 spd ex is no comp sorry to say. It won't even get it if it has i/h/e.
It doesn't matter with the weight difference. The rsx base would get it every time. 5 spd ex is no comp sorry to say. It won't even get it if it has i/h/e.
Search and Learn
iTrader: (34)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,004
Likes: 0
From: 909, Socal
Rep Power: 432 




Originally posted by R3DL1N3
when it comes out through the flywheel it would. well im just talking my setup. aem intake adds 8.9hp, magnaflow catback and hp header would add around 8 or 9.
when it comes out through the flywheel it would. well im just talking my setup. aem intake adds 8.9hp, magnaflow catback and hp header would add around 8 or 9.
intake doesnt do shiet. and it DOESNOT add 8.9hp. along with exhaust and header setup. you will get 5-10 max out of I/H/E on d17
This is the way I see it. Yeah on an ex you put on an i/h/e you might get about the actual 130 horses at the wheels, and about 115 torque if that. On an rsx you have about 141 horses at the wheels and then about 135 torque. So I still think the ex would need a little more.
Originally posted by mad_stylz36
This is the way I see it. Yeah on an ex you put on an i/h/e you might get about the actual 130 horses at the wheels, and about 115 torque if that. On an rsx you have about 141 horses at the wheels and then about 135 torque. So I still think the ex would need a little more.
This is the way I see it. Yeah on an ex you put on an i/h/e you might get about the actual 130 horses at the wheels, and about 115 torque if that. On an rsx you have about 141 horses at the wheels and then about 135 torque. So I still think the ex would need a little more.
both cars suck. end.
Originally posted by civicvtec1ps
haha no.
intake doesnt do shiet. and it DOESNOT add 8.9hp. along with exhaust and header setup. you will get 5-10 max out of I/H/E on d17
haha no.
intake doesnt do shiet. and it DOESNOT add 8.9hp. along with exhaust and header setup. you will get 5-10 max out of I/H/E on d17
Originally posted by dragoon
so the 200-300lb weight difference doesnt affect anything, right?
both cars suck. end.
so the 200-300lb weight difference doesnt affect anything, right?
both cars suck. end.
Search and Learn
iTrader: (34)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,004
Likes: 0
From: 909, Socal
Rep Power: 432 




Originally posted by mad_stylz36
Well actually if you look at the dynos on the AEM website, they have a 2001-2003 civic with a cold air with a peak gain of 8.9. That was the first thing I checked when I read his post.
Well actually if you look at the dynos on the AEM website, they have a 2001-2003 civic with a cold air with a peak gain of 8.9. That was the first thing I checked when I read his post.
Originally posted by dragoon
so the 200-300lb weight difference doesnt affect anything, right?
both cars suck. end.
so the 200-300lb weight difference doesnt affect anything, right?
both cars suck. end.
200-300lbs difference? Try 150 lbs. Come on, your civics aint feathers...
i remember awhile ago someone posted about the RSX that gained 15 hp from a DAC DC CAI....everyone believed that but they dont believe we can get 8.9 hp out of an AEM?! pfff...you guys are damn crazy. even with dyno chart posting.
base rsx's are slow in case u didnt notice, be it stick or auto, a civic with i/h/e could definitely pull on that car, i know, cause ive done it, plenty of times, there heavy, thats all there is to it!
eric
eric
Originally posted by SaiyanMatador
base rsx's are slow in case u didnt notice, be it stick or auto, a civic with i/h/e could definitely pull on that car, i know, cause ive done it, plenty of times, there heavy, thats all there is to it!
eric
base rsx's are slow in case u didnt notice, be it stick or auto, a civic with i/h/e could definitely pull on that car, i know, cause ive done it, plenty of times, there heavy, thats all there is to it!
eric
What's next? Soon you're gonna be telling me that you beat focus svts, mustangs, and 350zs
just because they're "heavy as hell" and your civic is a lightweight, nimble, acceleration monster.
Why do so many members here claim that the 7thgen is faster then the 6th gen, when in fact, horsepower output is the same and the 6th gen is lighter? From what I've heard, the 6th gen even responds better to mods.
Plus I've yet to see any member here post a dyno of your cars with I/H/E gaining more than 6whp, so please don't bull$hit yourself...
haha i started this post as a test becasue i just wanted to see if people get the impression that the rsx is fast or not. since it is just as fast as the EP civic si. From reading a prior post most members of this site thought that they could beat an si, so i wanted to see if the rsx's appereance changed their opinions.
i'd also like to extended a challenge to any one in the seattle area with a 7th gen civic who wants to challenge a civic si, or a base rsx because RSXTC has a base rsx and i have an si and we'll settled this argument once and for all vs a natuarly aspirated d17
i'd also like to extended a challenge to any one in the seattle area with a 7th gen civic who wants to challenge a civic si, or a base rsx because RSXTC has a base rsx and i have an si and we'll settled this argument once and for all vs a natuarly aspirated d17
Last edited by akiboy7; Jun 12, 2003 at 02:14 PM.
why would AEM post fake dynos? huh? tell me? call em up and ask how about it?
Last edited by akiboy7; Jun 12, 2003 at 02:18 PM.
Originally posted by akiboy7
haha this post is hella stupid. why would they post fake dyno's huh? huh? marketing!!! so idots like you will belive them and buy they're intakes
haha this post is hella stupid. why would they post fake dyno's huh? huh? marketing!!! so idots like you will belive them and buy they're intakes
the 7lbs of torque your 7gen has over the 6gen aint gonna do shiet...



