whomped on that fat pig they call an eclipse
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 400 
whomped on that fat pig they call an eclipse
I have always understood why US auto manufacturers make cars that are focused on straight line speed, and tend to ignore handling, and other such things. After all, the american way of driving is dictated by the 1/4 mile and "races" such as NASCAR where they drive in a "curved" straight line for 3 hours.
You have cars like the SRT4, which everyone loves to hate. Though given its own respect, it serves its purpose, even if that's not what the majority of us roadster loving bastards want in a car. (unfortunately its price puts the car into the hands of often immature and inexperienced "kids") Then you have those redneck T-shirts that say "my lug nuts require more torque than your honda makes". (meanwhile, i can't find a single USDM car that requires 153lb/ft of torque on the lugs, but i digress) Ah yes, nothing greater than the epitome of ignorance in regards to the laws of physics, such as that infamous T-shirt.
Anyways, enough of my ranting, but here is my point. Mitsubishi introduces to us their most recent iteration of a car called "the eclipse". Ironically enough, it'd take an object with probably as much mass and size as this car has, to be able to block out the sun and cause an eclipse. That's right folks, I'll be here all week. This new eclipse seems to be mitsubishi's attempt into the sport compact market, using american convention. A larger displacement engine, and lots more torque. Ironically enough, this makes the car larger than anything I'd consider a "sport compact". So honestly, what was mitsubishi thinking? If they wanted this much power, why didn't they go back to the era of the turbo eclipse?
Instead we get this bloated, 3,500 pound car. Not only that, but this thing eats PREMIUM gas like a fat kid at a cupcake bar. The "official" EPA mileage rating for this 3.8 liter V6 10.5:1 compression engine is 27mpg highway, and 18mpg city. However, not a SINGLE person I know with an eclipse, nor any car magazine that has done actual extensive road testing of the car, has EVER gotten better than about 17mpg AVERAGE.
Whoa, what's that? That's right. The people who tested this car (drove it around for 3000-5000 miles) AVERAGE around 17mpg. Well gee, how the heck does that happen, one might ask. Interestingly enough, the EPA figures put the car just BARELY into the gas guzzler tax penalty. In other words, there is a $1000 penalty added to the sticker price of any eclipse sold due to it's mileage. If you use ACTUAL figures that people are getting, this penalty WOULD be about $3200. This piece of sh*t car gets WORSE mileage (on average) in the city, than most SUVs. And it gets only .6 mpg BETTER than the FORD EXCURSION!!! The only benefit I see of this, is the instantaneous weight savings you get when racing someone, as your car will actually get lighter as it burns off gallons of fuel.
So I'm on the freeway last night, and I see a car dipping through traffic in my rear view. I'm in the left lane, going 80 in a 65 as it is, and eventually this car gets through traffic and makes its way past me. I see it's a new eclipse. My guess is he's low on gas (since he stopped at the last station to fill up 30 miles ago), and he needs to find a gas station quick.
Apparently, my car catches his eye, and he slows down a bit to let me catch up. I slow down to almost 60, and he gets next to me and starts to accelerate. I roll on the throttle a bit at first, and then finally downshift to 3rd. Now I don't know what kind of planet altering gravitational forces it takes to accelerate that much weight, but whatever he had, it wasn't enough. Once I heard him downshift and go, I hammered the gas and left him easily in my wake. Another fat pig, skewered by the S2k.
You have cars like the SRT4, which everyone loves to hate. Though given its own respect, it serves its purpose, even if that's not what the majority of us roadster loving bastards want in a car. (unfortunately its price puts the car into the hands of often immature and inexperienced "kids") Then you have those redneck T-shirts that say "my lug nuts require more torque than your honda makes". (meanwhile, i can't find a single USDM car that requires 153lb/ft of torque on the lugs, but i digress) Ah yes, nothing greater than the epitome of ignorance in regards to the laws of physics, such as that infamous T-shirt.
Anyways, enough of my ranting, but here is my point. Mitsubishi introduces to us their most recent iteration of a car called "the eclipse". Ironically enough, it'd take an object with probably as much mass and size as this car has, to be able to block out the sun and cause an eclipse. That's right folks, I'll be here all week. This new eclipse seems to be mitsubishi's attempt into the sport compact market, using american convention. A larger displacement engine, and lots more torque. Ironically enough, this makes the car larger than anything I'd consider a "sport compact". So honestly, what was mitsubishi thinking? If they wanted this much power, why didn't they go back to the era of the turbo eclipse?
Instead we get this bloated, 3,500 pound car. Not only that, but this thing eats PREMIUM gas like a fat kid at a cupcake bar. The "official" EPA mileage rating for this 3.8 liter V6 10.5:1 compression engine is 27mpg highway, and 18mpg city. However, not a SINGLE person I know with an eclipse, nor any car magazine that has done actual extensive road testing of the car, has EVER gotten better than about 17mpg AVERAGE.
Whoa, what's that? That's right. The people who tested this car (drove it around for 3000-5000 miles) AVERAGE around 17mpg. Well gee, how the heck does that happen, one might ask. Interestingly enough, the EPA figures put the car just BARELY into the gas guzzler tax penalty. In other words, there is a $1000 penalty added to the sticker price of any eclipse sold due to it's mileage. If you use ACTUAL figures that people are getting, this penalty WOULD be about $3200. This piece of sh*t car gets WORSE mileage (on average) in the city, than most SUVs. And it gets only .6 mpg BETTER than the FORD EXCURSION!!! The only benefit I see of this, is the instantaneous weight savings you get when racing someone, as your car will actually get lighter as it burns off gallons of fuel.
So I'm on the freeway last night, and I see a car dipping through traffic in my rear view. I'm in the left lane, going 80 in a 65 as it is, and eventually this car gets through traffic and makes its way past me. I see it's a new eclipse. My guess is he's low on gas (since he stopped at the last station to fill up 30 miles ago), and he needs to find a gas station quick.
Apparently, my car catches his eye, and he slows down a bit to let me catch up. I slow down to almost 60, and he gets next to me and starts to accelerate. I roll on the throttle a bit at first, and then finally downshift to 3rd. Now I don't know what kind of planet altering gravitational forces it takes to accelerate that much weight, but whatever he had, it wasn't enough. Once I heard him downshift and go, I hammered the gas and left him easily in my wake. Another fat pig, skewered by the S2k.
Last edited by S2000man01; Jan 13, 2006 at 12:49 PM.
haha awesome post 
"The only benefit I see of this, is the instantaneous weight savings you get when racing someone, as your car will actually get lighter as it burns off gallons of fuel."
haha genius!!
"The only benefit I see of this, is the instantaneous weight savings you get when racing someone, as your car will actually get lighter as it burns off gallons of fuel."
haha genius!!
Registered!!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: New Brunswick
Rep Power: 0 
Great post! 
When they first introduced this car, I was excited...but when i saw the mpg ratings as i researched them a few months ago, I almost started crying. They really cornered the market with this amazing pig.
When they first introduced this car, I was excited...but when i saw the mpg ratings as i researched them a few months ago, I almost started crying. They really cornered the market with this amazing pig.
Second Place is the First Loser
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas, US
Rep Power: 343
Originally Posted by S2000man01
Instead we get this bloated, 3,500 pound car. Not only that, but this thing eats PREMIUM gas like a fat kid at a cupcake bar.
those things weigh so much cuz the block is made out of IRON. yeah i have no idea what mitsubishi was smoking when they thought to make the front end of the car carry 80% of the weight.
Drunken Master-7thgen Ninja
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,976
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Rep Power: 336 i cant wait to run one. the v6 would kill me but the other 2 4 bangers ill eat alive hahaha.
EDIT: there is only 1 4 bagner. my bad.
the v6 weighs in at 4300.
the 4 banger comes in at 3300 curb for both. that is FAT.
EDIT: there is only 1 4 bagner. my bad.
the v6 weighs in at 4300.
the 4 banger comes in at 3300 curb for both. that is FAT.
Last edited by MajinB; Jan 14, 2006 at 06:12 PM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 400
Originally Posted by Hefe
What's a cupcake bar?
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 400
Originally Posted by gearbox
there is one thing i like about those cars...the blue led dash lights. that is all.
Registered!!
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton
Rep Power: 0 Are they actually running an iron block in that car? Maybe its not totally hopeless then, with an iron block I imagine that it could hold some decent amounts of boost eh? Anyone farmiliar w. the 3.8 care to comment?
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
bolt-on-bandito
Electrical
32
Jan 15, 2020 03:25 PM
dlg1985
8th & 9th Generation Civic 2006 - 2015
9
Jul 23, 2017 10:03 PM
Touge
Canada East
0
Sep 23, 2015 10:51 PM
Touge
Canada East
0
Sep 1, 2015 11:25 PM
