civic ex vs. 94 firebird
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
From: Houma, Louisiana
Rep Power: 305 




i hate threads like this. neither cars are fast at all. how about you give it a try and then YOU tell us what the outcome is.
The civic may have a chance. The 3.4L V6 they put in the early 4th gens is absolutely horrid.
GatorDan82... when you raced the 1996 Firebird it had a 3.8L V6 with 200hp. The 3.4L in the older ones is crap.
GatorDan82... when you raced the 1996 Firebird it had a 3.8L V6 with 200hp. The 3.4L in the older ones is crap.
Last edited by TurboDieselDrew; May 29, 2005 at 09:37 AM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 400 










My friend had a 92 firebird with the 3.4L. when he put in a more aggressive final drive gear, he was excited he finally broke 16's.
the 3.4liter firebird is a F*CKING DOG
the 3.4liter firebird is a F*CKING DOG
Originally Posted by TurboDieselDrew
The civic may have a chance. The 3.4L V6 they put in the early 4th gens is absolutely horrid.
GatorDan82... when you raced the 1996 Firebird it had a 3.8L V6 with 200hp. The 3.4L in the older ones is crap.
GatorDan82... when you raced the 1996 Firebird it had a 3.8L V6 with 200hp. The 3.4L in the older ones is crap.
Originally Posted by Daemones6
Boost the civic first. That would be an interesting race
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
brill
General Automotive Discussion
5
Nov 12, 2001 07:29 PM
WeRkX
General Automotive Discussion
24
Nov 1, 2001 10:33 PM





