Racing The Si
Registered!!
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
From: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Rep Power: 0 
Originally posted by Eeeeeeh
Thanks man. Yeah, I think that 145 is about right for crank hp. But I think that you are right on the money for 132hp on the dyno.
Thanks man. Yeah, I think that 145 is about right for crank hp. But I think that you are right on the money for 132hp on the dyno.
ive seen stock numbers for the Si at 135-140 whp
Registered!!
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
From: Jonestown, Pennsylvania, US
Rep Power: 0 i still say that 145 is too high for a crank hp # with your setup, but, go get some dyno time and prove me wrong, i would be glad to see it and admit that i was wrong. anyway, good luck with the car.
Registered!!
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Houston Tx/SuperBowl 2004
Rep Power: 0 Originally posted by VaSi
I have a 2002 Si with about 22,000 miles on it. The last time I was at the track I ran 15.32 @ 90mph. All I have is Intake, Headers and full Exhaust with hi flow cat.
I have a 2002 Si with about 22,000 miles on it. The last time I was at the track I ran 15.32 @ 90mph. All I have is Intake, Headers and full Exhaust with hi flow cat.
We pre-game harder than you party!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 0
From: Gastonia, NC
Rep Power: 301 I dont know man........Havier(CDMX) beat Trevor(civic2k2) and Trevor had Injen Intake and HKS exhaust.....and stock rims....lowered the right way.....and Havier has exhaust, intake.....rims.......beat him from like a 40 roll.......so oyu have a chance...........
Thread Starter
Registered!!
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Tx
Rep Power: 0 Originally posted by speedking604
eeeeeeehhhhh
if your not impressed with the si,,,,,why are you driving ex???????? by the way, sorry about your ride men, i'm glad your ok and i'm glad it's not an SI......j/k
eeeeeeehhhhh
if your not impressed with the si,,,,,why are you driving ex???????? by the way, sorry about your ride men, i'm glad your ok and i'm glad it's not an SI......j/k
The reason why I did not get the Si last year was because I wasn't too intrested in the looks of the car (Now there is a nice way to put it!). I am the type of person that doesn't always go for speed, I cared about other things back then, mainly looks. Hell, if the Neon SRT-4 was the exact same price as my EX back then than I would have still taken my little EX. I don't really recall saying that I wasn't impressed with the Si (correct if I'm wrong) but if I were not impressed with the car, why would I drive it?
Registered!!
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: whistler
Rep Power: 0 look at this site and tell me what you think??? http://www.geocities.com/speedking604 i know that stock vs stock, the ex is way better in looks but if you really care about too much look then you should have buy stuff like body kits,spoiler,wheels, and other stuff rather than buying performance stuff. you can make anycar looks better as long as you know how to desighn them and how far your willing to go $$$$$$$. by the way, i never seen any ex looks way better than my hatchback.i use to own 2002 acura 4 doors and that car is way look better than this car but after adding stuff, now this car is way better looks and run way faster. anyway, if i can go back at the time i bought this hatchback, i should have bought s2000.
by the way, that pic is kind of old, theres lots of stuff that been add now.......but no picture yet for the new one....
by the way, that pic is kind of old, theres lots of stuff that been add now.......but no picture yet for the new one....
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Touge
Canada East
0
Sep 23, 2015 10:51 PM
Touge
Ottawa
0
Sep 22, 2015 11:58 PM
Touge
Canada East
0
Sep 1, 2015 11:25 PM
Touge
Ottawa
0
Jul 18, 2015 05:39 PM
