Rep Power: 608

dude, just do yourself a favor and don't post in this thread........actually, please do, cuz i wanna see you get own3d.

You are not the first person to jump mike's sac about his abnormal times. But guess what, he has video's and timeslips to prove it. I myself have seen about 20 of his vids. It's all about the driver my friend.

And you can't compare your D17 LX with a vtec head to the VVTL-i

 
Rep Power: 0

It's definetely possible to have abnormal times compared to documented runs for many reasons...anything from an exceptionally well built engine to driver skill.

 
Rep Power: 608

well, mike's car is basically stock plus he has DR's.....but if u watch his vids, u see he is a great driver.

 
Rep Power: 0

and for the record I bought this car in july of 2003 paid $10K for it so I think I got a good deal out of it. lol

I've wanted this car for awhile and thats why I got it. yeah I coulda got something else BUT wheres the fun in that. lol plus this way I can do what I do to it with out worrying cause this is what I bought it for. lol

 
Rep Power: 333

so that's why you race so much...

 
Rep Power: 0

lol yup. it's my cars sole purpose in life. lol

 
Rep Power: 333

daily beater
poor car...

 
Rep Power: 0

poor car lucky me I just can't wait til my next round of mods is done! should see some much better times and only spend about $80 max. lol

 
Rep Power: 0

damnit..i wish i would've gotten a GT-S in the first place. oh well..im planning on using the lower compression to an advantage

 
Rep Power: 0

good luck! I'm hoping to beat the SF turbo GT N/A. this year

 
Rep Power: 0

i was not trying to **** every one off i was just saying that i find it hard to belive if you beat it then thats cool. i just dont think yuo could keep up with a 350 = decent driver and it really suprises me taht a stock 180 hp to the crank car can get times liek you claim cause rsx type s get hit only 14.9 and have more hp at the crank hints forth to the wheels. and i think you should probably run high 14's and low 15's but not low 14's that is faster then any stock mustang gt rx-8s turbo eclipse's and so on and so forth. i just dont see how the hp adds up to the numbers thats all. and when i posted my time slip you gave me props and said that gts's were lucky to get times like that so what makes yours a full second faster??? and as far as civic01vtec have fun waching me get owend like i care what you think any way.

 
Rep Power: 0

and i am deslexic that is why half my words are backwards haha

 
Rep Power: 0

well the gt-s is rated at 14.9 stock IF you pass redline which C&D doesnt. this also means they arent driving the car properly. A GT-S was designed to go past redline. it's IMPOSSIBLE to run better then 15.2 ish with out passing the redline. also the resaon we get a bad reputation for being slow. So a guy with most likely 3 runs to get his best time for the first time in a car 14.9 is good. also not too hard to see why after alot a driving in a car why I was able to hit 14.7 and 14.49 with seats removed.

also you insinuate that I'm not telling the truth and that this is all made up. yet I've shown countless vids and a few people have even seen me there at the track.
=================================
and it's true most gt-s owners are stuck at about 10.0 or worse. it's really sad.

heres a vid of me beating a rsx-s with I/E my first day ever at the 1/8 mile track ...
www.ksbservices.com/vids/mevsrsx.wmv

heres me now running 9.2 same setup only added the intake...
www.ksbservices.com/vids/mevslude.wmv

see what a difference learning to drive a car makes.

I dont have vids of every run I've ever done case thats hard to do. but it wasnt ilke 1 day I ran 10.0 and the next I ran 9.2 I bought the car in july and I've had over 20 track days now. figre 3-5 runs per day and you can see why my times progressed.

also for the record a decent driver in a stock 350 z runs 14.1 a bad driver can run anywhere from 14.1 - 14.8's. a good drive rina 350z would get high 13's. much better than my 14.2. but you gotta remember RWD + lsd = low 60' times. they usually run 2.0 I run 2.2 so a roll changes things.

heres me vs a supercharged Gt-S
www.ksbservices.com/vids/mikevslevi.wmv
heres us again froma 20mph roll
www.ksbservices.com/vids/mikevslevi2.wmv

see the difference a driver makes. I was also stock in those vids.

 
Rep Power: 0

^^^good drivers still arent hitting high 13's in the 350z

 
Rep Power: 608

And mike layeth the smacketh down

 
Rep Power: 608

yeah ur right

 
Rep Power: 0

so what does your car really redline at cause that would make alot more sense because the gts is high revin so you would get more hp at higher revs but does your car not have a revlimeter. and why does toyota lower the rev limit??? oww and civic01vtec you havent said anything on this thread useful all you have done is talked **** why dont you do me a favor and quit posting in this thread or stop brething or somthing.

 
Rep Power: 608

hehehehehe......getting a little upset are we ?

 
Rep Power: 0

My rev limit is 8400 rpms. they lowered it for the year 2002, found out that was stupid and fixed it for 03, but added the drive by wire setup which is a lil slower IMHO.

 
Rep Power: 0

danm that is high what boost levels can your can handle since it seems to have strong internals???

hehehehehe......getting a little upset are we ?
yeah your right you know alot about me dont you. hehe and you need to work on you flash skills that is a shitty cut out you did on the turbo and it does not evan stay in sinc from frame to frame you are an amature at best. and i did not know turbo was a flame thrower.

 
Rep Power: 0

now now ladies play nice or shut the fvck up

 
Rep Power: 0

most it can handle is about 7 psi before knock. 11.5:1 is not boost friendly. ya really need to drop it to 8.8:1 for good boost.

 
Rep Power: 0

so with lower comprasion your rods would be able to hndle quit a bit boost. like my freinds new car gs-t can handle like 20 psi on stock internal that is crazy. i cant wait for him to start boosting it.

 
Rep Power: 0

not very safe to do that on a gt-s thats for sure. I'm gonna go full N/A so I'm not really concerned how much boost it can hold. If I decide to go with FI I'd just slap on a 50 shot. but thats about it.

 
Rep Power: 608

wow, ur a moron........ur dissin me on flash skills ?

i copy and pasted it from another site

Who cares about that crap......this is a car forum

 
Rep Power: 0

why you geting so upset about it then and how many times have you wonderd what your car would look like with some other rims or a body kit or somthing then you would care about flash and photoshop would you not. but you know what **** it lets let bygone be bygones and just drop this alright. mike never "laid the smack down" he informed me how he did it and we agreed on it but you cant let it go. so lets drop it alright

 
Rep Power: 0

don't make me send you to your rooms now.

 
Rep Power: 327

back to the beginning, nice kill...

the gt-s u raced... was the a supercharged eclipse or celica?

 
Rep Power: 0

if you mean those vids it was a supercharged celica GT-S. he has since retuned it and is .4 faster than he was in those vids. but also I'm .2 faster. lol he still needs a new tranny then he'll kill me.

 
Rep Power: 327

nice nice