bEsT 0-60 in a 7th Gen?
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,151
Likes: 3
From: Washington DC
Rep Power: 423 
I don't know what difference it makes since it's not too accurate of a measurement of speed... but 7.9 sec.
I honestly prefer the 5-60 street start time... it takes shitty tires and shitty driving out of the equation.
I honestly prefer the 5-60 street start time... it takes shitty tires and shitty driving out of the equation.
Registered!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas, US
Rep Power: 0 Well the difference between 0-60 and 5-60 is pretty different. Because it takes a car 300% more energy to move from a stand still than from a roll.
Originally posted by Boilermaker1
I don't know what difference it makes since it's not too accurate of a measurement of speed... but 7.9 sec.
I honestly prefer the 5-60 street start time... it takes shitty tires and shitty driving out of the equation.
I don't know what difference it makes since it's not too accurate of a measurement of speed... but 7.9 sec.
I honestly prefer the 5-60 street start time... it takes shitty tires and shitty driving out of the equation.
Registered!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas, US
Rep Power: 0 I know that the Chevrolet Camaro SS does 0-60 in 5.0 and turns a 13.4 second 1/4. I imagine that our turbo civics would perform better 0-60 because we have similair 1/4s but have poor 60-100. I think that our 0-60 must be rather quick.
Originally posted by futurersxswap
yes... us turbo cars are running around a 4.8 second 0-60 i think... atealst on like 7psi
yes... us turbo cars are running around a 4.8 second 0-60 i think... atealst on like 7psi
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zygrene
6th Generation Civic 1996 - 2000
1
Mar 22, 2016 12:36 PM
John2009
8th & 9th Generation Civic 2006 - 2015
3
Sep 10, 2015 09:53 PM
