Rennen

iTrader: (35)

i wouldnt say jdm fanboys. the site is probably filled up more with people that like clean cars that arent too flashy. cars that dont have neon lights everywhere, big time paint jobs or twenty billion buttons that do different things. its just a coincidence that the JDM theme fits it perfectly.

chkolny

so...i was right ...lol. thanx for backing me up.

Jopa3804

i was sick of my caky interior so thats why its all at the shop naw geting fiberglass it will all take a new form

Jopa3804

Thanx man i preciate it .and dont worrie i know how some peaple can be.no offence to anyone but jdm peaple can somtimes be very closed minded lol

Jopa3804

so my car dosent look clean because ive actually spent money into it ?

Kevbotron

iTrader: (1)

^no you can spend a lot of money and still make it look generally like the manufacturer intended, just added a multitude of subtle changes.. props to the amount of work that went into it, but I prefer the clean look over the flashy/show look

trubluciv

nice ride bro.....looks like you spent a lot of time on it.....good for you

chkolny

hey im sorry man i dont wanna pick on you, but you worded it perfectly, and my question is .. WHY??, why would you spend perhaps 5K on your car, and have it look completely stock? when you could spend nothing and have it look almost IDENTICAL to the one that had 5k blown on it to make it made tyte JDM. Spending thousands of dollars on your car to make it super tyte JDM is a little silly IMO here, the only changes would be stuff like folding mirrors, side markers, subtle changed tails, and huge JDM logos (https://www.civicforums.com/forums/2...er-badge.html), lol.

Kevbotron

iTrader: (1)

Dude it's just two sides of the coin.. would you rather spend money on as you put "stuff like folding mirrors, side markers, subtle changed tails" all of which are FUNCTIONAL to driving as opposed to flashy lights that don't do anything to help your driving and are simply meant for show.. as I said props to the OP'er who put a lot of time and effort into making car neat to look at, but I'm sorry I'd rather have one that's more functional DRIVING, as opposed to sitting in a car show..

beadebaserr

iTrader: (7)

performance? just maybe? haha.

chkolny

i didnt say performance, i said mad tyte jdm looks.

and as for functional, how are folding mirrors any more functional than flashy things? or sidemarkers? those are pretty much meant to be flashy too, they are installed too low to serve as blind spot blinkers.

all im saying is that crap like an underglow kit is just as "functional" as a sidemarkers or JDM tails, None of this crap will help you with your driving, but it just bugs me when i see cars that have tonnes of work and $$ put into them and then hordes of posts after it pointing out its non jdm tyte flaws in it.

anyways /end rant, im done with this

beadebaserr

iTrader: (7)

it has nothing to do with things being JDM as much as it has to do with things being SUBTLE and SIMPLE, not flashy and tacky, reinforcing the bad rap imports already get.

in fact, i don't think I have one JDM part on my car.

Kevbotron

iTrader: (1)

^yahh and I'd rather have your car than the OP's

es*oneeCivic2k5

nice ride how much money was spent into it ?
btw, what happened to your other front bumper

Rennen

iTrader: (35)

you spell tight wrong like 12 times by the way. and nobody says "mad tyte JDM" anymore.

beadebaserr

iTrader: (7)

like anyone was ever serious when they said it in the first place. haha.

es*oneeCivic2k5

did u actaully count ?

Rennen

iTrader: (35)

umm... no... was it 12? cuz i really dont care.

es*oneeCivic2k5

well who cares about typing "tyte" wrong in the first place

chkolny

hahah, you cared enough to point it out and attempt to make a weak little burn.

RHCP0801

iTrader: (3)

lol dumbass

J Casanova

Rennen

iTrader: (35)

w/e. im supposed to be nice on here anyways, so im not gonna get into it with you. please try to keep it on topic.

DsevenEm2

iTrader: (6)

^geez i thought ud never say it. its like everybody is just WAITING for that moment to flame on. LOL

hey OP, did you paint it yourself? sorry if i missed it.

It isnt my cup of tea, but to each his own. goodluck with the turbo, dont forget to make a build thread for it.

Rennen

iTrader: (35)

eh, well i think that this:

looks worse than this (my little brother's car 750rwhp):

i think it looks good cuz it looks like it could have rolled out of the factory this way and doesnt have neons

J Casanova

well now that this is a supra thread did everybody hear about nick hogan killing some guy when he wrecked his supra lol? wait no lol thats horrible

Rennen

iTrader: (35)

not a supra thread. i was pointing out that "mad tyte JDM" themed cars are a lot better than flashy show cars.

chkolny

well i said i was done, but you just kept it up, and ill include some pics for ya!
would you rather pay about 5K and have this?


or pay 5 k and have this?


but the second one is so made tyte OEM jdm yo, its so clean!!

chkolny

wow and just 2 posts later you bring it back up? nice!....

Mandu

Look alright, doesn't win me over too much though.. Not feelin' the tail lights or body kit.. but it looks alright. If that's what you like, well, have fun.