hehe. dodge = ?
My rectum hurts........
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 0 
Oh yeah them Honda trucks are ugly.... and even uglier in person..the interior is very nice exept for the door handle inside is as big as the whole door and ugly. Other than that... ugly. Interior= 8-9 Design=3+ its a confortoble truck..ugly as hell though 
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 399 
Originally Posted by sxt_003
sad part about it is stock for stock an ugly neon have more hp and tq....
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 399
Originally Posted by 86prelude
Forgive me...I haven't really been in the Honda scene that much. Are we supposed to make fun of other cars because they're not Honda...or what? I don't really understand...
Registered!!
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 297
Originally Posted by S2000man01
it's some harmless poking fun at dodge. there are plenty of forums where the same is done with honda. don't get your panties in a bunch.
Dodge is in fact not making good reliable cars compare to Honda. Everybody who owns a honda can technically poking fun at it.
For those who ONW demestics but pokes Honda's and Toyota's, they are indeed just jalous because it is a fact that they know Honda and toyota cars have only received a better public review so far.
Registered!!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by orion_squall
yeah
Dodge is in fact not making good reliable cars compare to Honda. Everybody who owns a honda can technically poking fun at it.
For those who ONW demestics but pokes Honda's and Toyota's, they are indeed just jalous because it is a fact that they know Honda and toyota cars have only received a better public review so far.
Dodge is in fact not making good reliable cars compare to Honda. Everybody who owns a honda can technically poking fun at it.
For those who ONW demestics but pokes Honda's and Toyota's, they are indeed just jalous because it is a fact that they know Honda and toyota cars have only received a better public review so far.
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
My rectum hurts........
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by sxt_003
that's because they are more publicized in tv, commercials, movies, huge amounts of aftermarket support and what not. The orginal or 1st gen neons were made for made for economical reasons (for people who couldn't afford a nice vehicle but stil needed to get around) Though now they are being made alot better and with a little more style, but still cheap so people can afford them.
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
Last edited by Mustang5.0HO; May 18, 2005 at 02:15 PM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,031
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US
Rep Power: 399
Originally Posted by sxt_003
that's because they are more publicized in tv, commercials, movies, huge amounts of aftermarket support and what not. The orginal or 1st gen neons were made for made for economical reasons (for people who couldn't afford a nice vehicle but stil needed to get around) Though now they are being made alot better and with a little more style, but still cheap so people can afford them.
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
you are the most clueless troll i've met. first your horribly inaccurate post on the hemi and now this. lol. wait til zzyzx sees this post. 
Registered!!
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 297
Originally Posted by sxt_003
that's because they are more publicized in tv, commercials, movies, huge amounts of aftermarket support and what not. The orginal or 1st gen neons were made for made for economical reasons (for people who couldn't afford a nice vehicle but stil needed to get around) Though now they are being made alot better and with a little more style, but still cheap so people can afford them.
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
As far as the more hp and tq, yet still slow i would love for u to back that up...The first gen neons manual tranny will own a stock civic. Also when have u heard a civic wining autox, SCCA, WRC, let alone any other category of racing. The neon has been around less time than civics yet have more trophies to back up their motors (which is what it's all about) and not looks like most of u might think. Differenc between a cool civic driver and an idiot is that fact right there. Doesn't matter how good it looks if u are going for speed. Maybe that's why so many of u have bad names as ricers and what not. I'd rather a faster car than a car with style especially if i'm going to go around saying i have a fast car. Better to base off performance than looks like u do
What are you talking about?
Who the hell is talking about racing here? I just stated the obvious reason why Doge is generally consider inferior. Civic has been in the top 5 best sellers in North America for many years now, and occupied more than 40% of the compact size car market. And quality is the main reason why people here bought Civic.
So are you saying that 2.5+ millions of north american's who bought Civic and who does not care about racin are all idiots?
Are you a professional in SCCA? in WRC? I guess you are just a general car driver as everybody else. Dont' you? Performance for you is basically driving offensively on public street and maybe straight line 1/4 mile. Isn't it?
Really, what do you have to comment on a better quality car in a better quality forum??
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
robjcivic
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
3
Mar 12, 2017 12:10 PM
SOHCVTEC
General Automotive Discussion
44
May 29, 2002 09:34 PM
