Quote:
As for people can't be tight with money these days, welcome to debt and bankruptcy in the future.
those cars weigh almost 2 tons and put out about half a ton of hp/torque Originally Posted by cambo
69' Camaros might weigh a ton, but how much power did they put out? Probably a ton as well.As for people can't be tight with money these days, welcome to debt and bankruptcy in the future.
.
Last time I had this much fun some furniture got broken!
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!! Quote:
ha id rather throw in a roll cage and only have 2 seats than have leather anything! leather= Originally Posted by Mustang5.0HO
It was looking freaking sweet.... Oh yeah im used to those monsters like 69' Camaros that weight A TON and run very fast times.... Im just used to all that I guess. And it shouldnt be a big jump from a I4 to a v6.... Shouldnt be that big of a diff. People cant be tight with money these days. C'mon now...lol. So yeah. I wouldnt strip my car down just to go faster. I rather look good in leather interior and go fast at the same time. 
I know thats spinning what you said a little but you get my point.
Quote:
v5 or I5?Originally Posted by ricergribbs
you sure it's not a v5 you're thinking of? My acura has an I5.
not being BIAS but I do like the Si concept better... Mitsu's have never had reliable engines...
What I want to know is why everyone thinks this car is ugly yet everybody praises the WRX STI.The Sti to me is one of the ugliest cars being produced.Does everybody just read the numbers and forget about everything else.I think if you want a race, car buy a race car, none of these cars are meant to be raced on the streets any way.BTW-The new STI is going to look worse than the current one.
hey diskreet i posted thsi thread when it was official they were making it, at least once i found out,
and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
Quote:
i loved the bug-eyed WRX's, wish theyd bring those back. beauty is in the eye of the beholder eh?Originally Posted by angelswin
What I want to know is why everyone thinks this car is ugly yet everybody praises the WRX STI.The Sti to me is one of the ugliest cars being produced.Does everybody just read the numbers and forget about everything else.I think if you want a race, car buy a race car, none of these cars are meant to be raced on the streets any way.BTW-The new STI is going to look worse than the current one. Last time I had this much fun some furniture got broken!
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!! Quote:
and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
i know i wasnt aiming that at you like i said in my post. just to all the other just realizing this now.Originally Posted by ncirom2003
hey diskreet i posted thsi thread when it was official they were making it, at least once i found out,and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
sorry for the mis-understanding
Quote:
and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
uhhh... yes there is a v5... gimme a sec i was just looking at some cars on kbb.com for my parents and i think one of the saabs or audis or osmething had em. ill find it in a sec.Originally Posted by ncirom2003
hey diskreet i posted thsi thread when it was official they were making it, at least once i found out,and there is 3 4 cylinder config's guys, there is inline boxer and v-4 yes v4 they made it rarely but there was one i believe actually in the old vw bugs maybe but i know some things had them
and there is no v5, period
here we are, the volvo 50 and 70 series wagons. comes with a 2.4 or turbo 2.5 5-cylinder engine. guess it might be an inline 5, not sure.
those are gettin uglier everytime they come out with a new design 
Quote:
yes inline 5, there is a huge difference, you cant make an odd numbered v-style engine becasuse of the odd weight and balancing it would mess everything up, although its possible to make a v6,v8 and cut off a few cylinders electronically at highway speeds because there is still the weight of the pistons in the other cylinders balancing everything out.Originally Posted by ricergribbs
here we are, the volvo 50 and 70 series wagons. comes with a 2.4 or turbo 2.5 5-cylinder engine. guess it might be an inline 5, not sure. 
That eclipse looks very good..... all backed up with the hp and v6 looks good for that company
It looks okay...the concept looked a helluva lot better. My main gripe with it is...
why all that power to the WRONG WHEELS?!?!? I hope a GS-X is in the future.
why all that power to the WRONG WHEELS?!?!? I hope a GS-X is in the future.
