92 supra, any potential?
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, Michigan
Rep Power: 0 
92 supra, any potential?
My friend Shane has a 92 toyota supra. I told him that it has no potential, because it;s the older suora, and they suck. I said that 93+ years are the good supras. Give me some comments about what you guys think about it. thanks
I like ruining your threads.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,165
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Rep Power: 0 
NA or Turbo?
Either way they have potential. The 7MGE and 7MGTE are rather stout motors and can take their fair share of abuse. Do a little research before you tell somebody their car sucks, there are plenty of MKIII supras that would wax a MKIV.
Either way they have potential. The 7MGE and 7MGTE are rather stout motors and can take their fair share of abuse. Do a little research before you tell somebody their car sucks, there are plenty of MKIII supras that would wax a MKIV.
Registered!!
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: I sleep in a drawer.
Rep Power: 0 ^ ya, what he said... The older supras have a grip of potential. A stock turbo would wipe many new cars a$$ess all over the street. Now stop being so ignorant and do some research. Maybe that way you won't have to come on here and ask everyone else if your bashing of another automobile was valid.
I sure wish my car was newer
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis, Mo
Rep Power: 364
Originally Posted by civicrider01
My friend Shane has a 92 toyota supra. I told him that it has no potential, because it;s the older suora, and they suck. I said that 93+ years are the good supras. Give me some comments about what you guys think about it. thanks
2) Throw it away.
The only dept. where the 93+ Supras have a lot more potential is looks.
Originally Posted by white2K2EX
1) Locate your copy of The Fast & The Furious.
2) Throw it away.
The only dept. where the 93+ Supras have a lot more potential is looks.
2) Throw it away.
The only dept. where the 93+ Supras have a lot more potential is looks.
Originally Posted by civicrider01
My friend Shane has a 92 toyota supra. I told him that it has no potential, because it;s the older suora, and they suck. I said that 93+ years are the good supras. Give me some comments about what you guys think about it. thanks
those 89-92 turbo models put down 232bhp/254tq. damn good power for an 89 imo. http://www.supercars.net/cars/1989@$Toyota@$Supra%20Turbox.html
the n/a models prob put out 150hp or in the mid 100's i would say. either way, the 92 supra are pretty decent cars cause they can still own the honda class on the road today. not sure if aftermarket companies are supporting these older supras, but i seen few crazy ones off ebaymotors and prob 2 in magazines.
the n/a models prob put out 150hp or in the mid 100's i would say. either way, the 92 supra are pretty decent cars cause they can still own the honda class on the road today. not sure if aftermarket companies are supporting these older supras, but i seen few crazy ones off ebaymotors and prob 2 in magazines.
Cocky guys kick ass!
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, West Virginia
Rep Power: 311 are you joking? my uncle had an old Supra.. 85' i think.. it tore *** up. mustangs, vettes, camaros.. you name it, he killed them. ANY Supra has a ton of potential.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
SidCivic
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
14
Sep 12, 2015 05:28 PM
