SRT-4 on SSR GT1's
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by big_daddy_b_99
SRT-4's suck so much i'm trading in my vic for one haha and can't wait. i think the eyelids do help it out a lot and will probably be the only exterior thing i'm changin on mine.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by WhiteCastle
c6 now ...
ohh btw I saw a neon running the Nur Burg Germany race track
...ohh btw I saw a neon running the Nur Burg Germany race track
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by h01civic
man that car looks aggressive
eyelids
are there 'lids for a vic? I have never seen any but I think it would be cool to see maybe a rsx-headlight eyelid (on the underside)
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by modoman
^^i think those eyelashes would really put that car in its place
13.3 @ 103 bone stock
the numbers put the car in it's place...among the elite FWD...
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0 hey AdamOSU
I saw your quote in your sig and I have one for you. This one is from Sport Compact Car, a by far less biased source than CHEVROLET!
"Nineteen sixty-four Pontiac GTO, 1962 Chevy Impala SS 409, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 1970 Plymouth AAR Cuda, 2003 Dodge SRT-4--musclecars, every one."
eat that.
I saw your quote in your sig and I have one for you. This one is from Sport Compact Car, a by far less biased source than CHEVROLET!
"Nineteen sixty-four Pontiac GTO, 1962 Chevy Impala SS 409, 1969 Chevy Camaro, 1970 Plymouth AAR Cuda, 2003 Dodge SRT-4--musclecars, every one."
eat that.
You know it's cool that you have an SRT-4 and a Civic, but honestly I'm not posting everything I find about an S2000 on here because it's not an S2000 site, there's another site for that... some people might care some might not.. I'm one of those people who don't. And why are you so defensive? Just because I have a quote that has nothing to do with you, you feel the need to respond. Yeah, I'd probably find myself defending that car all the time too.
Last edited by AdamOSU; Oct 12, 2004 at 02:31 PM.
I usually put a cucumber in my bum when I jerk off!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Rep Power: 0 Ok your neon is fast..whoopy dee mother fukn doo.. a bike is fast, a 5.0 mustang is fast, a normal neon with a turbo is fast, a old school hatchback+turbo is fast...? dumb ***.... Your points are non-existent.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by johnovan
Ok your neon is fast..whoopy dee mother fukn doo.. a bike is fast, a 5.0 mustang is fast, a normal neon with a turbo is fast, a old school hatchback+turbo is fast...? dumb ***.... Your points are non-existent.
case and point...50k dropped into my vic gets pwned by 50k dropped into an srt-4
the quickest street-legal civic I have ever seen ran low 12's to high 11's
the fastest srt-4 (street legal) that I have seen runs mid to low 10's
there's a little difference there, no?
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by johnovan
typical neon-4 driver...
E36 M3 Driver.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, riv., US
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by DodgeNeonSRT-4
errr...whatever.
13.3 @ 103 bone stock
the numbers put the car in it's place...among the elite FWD...
13.3 @ 103 bone stock
the numbers put the car in it's place...among the elite FWD...
honestly dude where did you get those rediculous numbers from?
prob some car and track mag or motor trend? 
neon srt-4 = mid 14 second car stock (i believe) but i guess depends what gas its using
neon srt-4 = mid 14 second car stock (i believe) but i guess depends what gas its using
Last edited by jttegx; Oct 12, 2004 at 10:31 PM.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 0
From: NJ, USA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by jonnyg
honestly dude where did you get those rediculous numbers from?
Originally Posted by DodgeNeonSRT-4
road and track magazine. I would love for you to find a more reliable and consistent source than that. 03 srt-4 on 103 octane race gas on a nice spring day
how often are you filling in 103 gas in your neon?
sources:
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=7871 (2004 neon - 14.1@1/4... car and driver)
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=1868 another 14.2@1/4
i never knew they took the pt turbo engine, slapped it on an neon along with a mitsu turbocharger and then created the neon srt-4. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...ay/index5.html
Last edited by jttegx; Oct 13, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
