Shame we dont have double wishbone.
Shame we dont have double wishbone.
Man I drove a double wishbone suspension car today and realized how much better it is then this mcphearson strut garbage.
Why they decided to change for our generation?
Why they decided to change for our generation?
Autocross Junky
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,211
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Rep Power: 381 










before all of you go around bashing Macpherson struts, heres a short list of other car companys that also use them...
BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, Volkswagon, Audi ect ect ect.......
BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, Volkswagon, Audi ect ect ect.......
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 1
Rep Power: 344 


I was actually digging into a TSX that autocrosses with me, checking out the front suspension setup (double wish bones)....with a welder, talent, and a doner car you could convert your car.....
Back From The Banned!
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,226
Likes: 0
From: Queens, New York, US
Rep Power: 339 



Originally Posted by Zzyzx
before all of you go around bashing Macpherson struts, heres a short list of other car companys that also use them...
BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, Volkswagon, Audi ect ect ect.......
BMW, Porsche, Mercedes, Volkswagon, Audi ect ect ect.......
just b/c the suspension is a certain way, doesnt mean it's a immediate "bad". The Vette has leaf springs and that car can still handle.
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 0 
Having owned a previous gen car with the double wishbone set-up (2000 1.6EL) and now owning a current gen with mac struts up front (2003 1.7EL), I can honestly say the difference between the 2 (stock vs. stock) is not as bad as alot of people seem to think it is. In all honesty, there is next to no difference at all, and yes I drive both cars rather hard.
Why is my vagina bleeding?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 305 

What was better about the double wishbone front set up? was the only advantage that it was cheaper to lower the car?
The new Integra type R has a MAC front set up.
The new Integra type R has a MAC front set up.
Autocross Junky
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,211
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Rep Power: 381 










Originally Posted by nindoo
What was better about the double wishbone front set up? was the only advantage that it was cheaper to lower the car?
The new Integra type R has a MAC front set up.
The new Integra type R has a MAC front set up.
Ride quality there should be no Perceptible difference between a strut and double wishbone type suspensions...
performance handling, Double wish bone type suspensions have some atributes that play well in to handling and not so well in to Lowering... as in Camber Gain!!
Camber gain is when the suspension compresses and you get Extra negitive camber. You'll notice it on the older civics that were lowered with out camber kits. the cars wheels look like this / \ from the front/back. Struts dont gain much negitive camber as they compress.Camber Gain, BTW, is a good thing when it comes to handling. as it gives you a bit more negitive camber when ever you turn, giveing you just a bit more traction. It also allows you to run less static negitive camber, which helps braking and acceleration.
i think about this every day... i've driven an integra, and the suspension seemed just a whole lot better than our macstruts...
i wish they would've kept the double wishbone....they did it on the TSX... why not mine?
i wish they would've kept the double wishbone....they did it on the TSX... why not mine?
Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 385
Likes: 1
From: Detroit, Michigan, US
Rep Power: 0 
also let's not forget no company realy sets the car up for handling as it should be. even the companys with double wish bone don't mount them right for great handling, and if you are racing (mostly SCCA) everyone else is stuck with the stock stuff too.
Why is my vagina bleeding?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 305 

How do you know the double wishbone set-up of the previous civic is better than ours. Can you take turns faster with it? The newer body and chassis is suppose to be much more rigid. The only advantage I see of the double wishone front, it seems that it would be easier to to lower the car.
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (10)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, Alabama
Rep Power: 285 

Originally Posted by blackbullet
I would kill to have the double wishbone suspension. So much easier to lay front!!
I'll flip out and kill people.
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,362
Likes: 1
From: ATX, Planet Beldar
Rep Power: 366 










the wishbone setup is better in at least one sense... its more reliable. already have struts goin out on my car, and i know lots of people on here have had them go out. the new suspension is fine except for the pops, rattles, crunches, creaks, groans, scrapes and other various noises i hear while i drive/turn. btw i dont have the money for new struts so i get to enjoy the crappiness of the factory ones until i can get coilovers/bags or at least replacements.
i do believe you can get the dc5 type r's suspension setup and bolt it onto our cars, but its hideously expensive to import them and the parts themselves are high dollar aluminum.
example: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT
i do believe you can get the dc5 type r's suspension setup and bolt it onto our cars, but its hideously expensive to import them and the parts themselves are high dollar aluminum.
example: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT
McPherson struts: yeah they may save space, yes they are used by hig end companies blah blah blah. BUT, and this is a big but, if the rest of the front end geometry sucks, you get the crappy Honda Civic suspension that we have. Ever notice that our car suffers from TERRIBLE BUMP STEER? That was the first thing I noticed when I took that bad boy out on the highway and encountered a turn with a bump......damn thing sent me across the lane. I was able to counter-act some of it with lowering springs, strut tower brace, and rear lower tie bar but I can still feel it once in a while. I think if I do a front and rear sway bar kit and rear RSX strut tower brace, you might not notice it. That's why folks.....we have an ECONO car.
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by modoman
the wishbone setup is better in at least one sense... its more reliable. already have struts goin out on my car, and i know lots of people on here have had them go out. the new suspension is fine except for the pops, rattles, crunches, creaks, groans, scrapes and other various noises i hear while i drive/turn. btw i dont have the money for new struts so i get to enjoy the crappiness of the factory ones until i can get coilovers/bags or at least replacements.
i do believe you can get the dc5 type r's suspension setup and bolt it onto our cars, but its hideously expensive to import them and the parts themselves are high dollar aluminum.
example: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT
i do believe you can get the dc5 type r's suspension setup and bolt it onto our cars, but its hideously expensive to import them and the parts themselves are high dollar aluminum.
example: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...RK%3AMEWA%3AIT
Why is my vagina bleeding?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Rep Power: 305 

Originally Posted by modoman
err i meant wishbone setup of old civics compared to the mac strut on our civics... not the macpherson setup in general. sorry.
Did you read my post about the chassis and body being more rigid on our gen vics?
There are several advantages of using the MacPherson strut suspension systems.
These include:
1. They weigh less than the conventional two control arm system.
2. The system spreads the suspension load over a wider span of the car's chassis.
3. That take up less room in the engine compartment, which allows room for other components.
4.There are fewer moving parts than in the conventional two arm control arm system.
These facts taken out of the textbook MOTOR AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY third edition. No where in the text does it mention that MacPhersons are inferior to double wishbones.
These include:
1. They weigh less than the conventional two control arm system.
2. The system spreads the suspension load over a wider span of the car's chassis.
3. That take up less room in the engine compartment, which allows room for other components.
4.There are fewer moving parts than in the conventional two arm control arm system.
These facts taken out of the textbook MOTOR AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY third edition. No where in the text does it mention that MacPhersons are inferior to double wishbones.
That is not an ordinary rabbit tis the most foul cruel beast
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
From: California
Rep Power: 318 





Originally Posted by CuRiOuSfIsH
Lets not forget everyone's "favorite" the EVO and Sti and M3!
just b/c the suspension is a certain way, doesnt mean it's a immediate "bad". The Vette has leaf springs and that car can still handle.
just b/c the suspension is a certain way, doesnt mean it's a immediate "bad". The Vette has leaf springs and that car can still handle.
same pro driver tested them both twice and the vette beat it by 2 secounds.
I'll flip out and kill people.
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,362
Likes: 1
From: ATX, Planet Beldar
Rep Power: 366 










I DONT MEAN that the macphereson is inferior, in fact i KNOW its superior!!! however, the fact that my struts suck makes me wish i had the wishbone, just so i dont have to replace the damn struts every 20k. thats all. i dont mean the setup is sucky, i mean that it sucks from the factory... errg do u get me?
That is not an ordinary rabbit tis the most foul cruel beast
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
From: California
Rep Power: 318 





Originally Posted by modoman
I DONT MEAN that the macphereson is inferior, in fact i KNOW its superior!!! however, the fact that my struts suck makes me wish i had the wishbone, just so i dont have to replace the damn struts every 20k. thats all. i dont mean the setup is sucky, i mean that it sucks from the factory... errg do u get me?



