Stock... what is faster than an S2000?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 










Stock... what is faster than an S2000?
I'm annoyed with doing the research for all the different cars. I've looked in various magazines but they all give different times for the same things...
So if I get an S2000 (not an '04) and keep it stock, what will be able to beat me (also stock) in straight line acceleration? I know the S2000 is pretty awesome in handling so I'm not concerned about that.
Now I know that exotics and such will be able to beat me. Corvettes, too. But what else? V-8 Mustangs? SVT Cobras? Evos? WRXs? SRT-4's? Firebirds, Grand-Ams, Bonnevilles with their superchargers, etc. Are there any like SUVs or any **** that's in the "big truck class" that will be able to beat me? That pisses me off in my Civic, when minivans and big pickup trucks could accelerate faster than me. Cuz if I get a 2 seater roadster convertible ::coughsportscarcough:: and then get beaten by a truck that's not even designed to be fast, I'd be pissed.
So if I get an S2000 (not an '04) and keep it stock, what will be able to beat me (also stock) in straight line acceleration? I know the S2000 is pretty awesome in handling so I'm not concerned about that.
Now I know that exotics and such will be able to beat me. Corvettes, too. But what else? V-8 Mustangs? SVT Cobras? Evos? WRXs? SRT-4's? Firebirds, Grand-Ams, Bonnevilles with their superchargers, etc. Are there any like SUVs or any **** that's in the "big truck class" that will be able to beat me? That pisses me off in my Civic, when minivans and big pickup trucks could accelerate faster than me. Cuz if I get a 2 seater roadster convertible ::coughsportscarcough:: and then get beaten by a truck that's not even designed to be fast, I'd be pissed.
I sure wish my car was newer
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis, Mo
Rep Power: 364 




GT Mustangs will be pretty close
Cobras should kill ya.
You'll take WRXs.
The WRX STis should take you since they're as fast as a Cobra. I don't know about EVOs.
Dunno about SRT-4s. Even if they're faster, the S2000 is better looking.
Firebirds won't be as fast. Neither will RS Camaros.
Trans Ams, WS6s, Z28s, and SSs will take you.
Grand Ams don't have superchargers - S2000 all the way.
Grand Prix GTPs and Bonneville SSEis will be pretty close.
Most trucks wouldn't touch you. They have more hp, but that doesn't usually make up for the massive weight they have. A Lightning should take you.
I believe the S2000 is faster than the RX-8, and about equal with a 350Z.
I think that about covers it.
Cobras should kill ya.
You'll take WRXs.
The WRX STis should take you since they're as fast as a Cobra. I don't know about EVOs.
Dunno about SRT-4s. Even if they're faster, the S2000 is better looking.
Firebirds won't be as fast. Neither will RS Camaros.
Trans Ams, WS6s, Z28s, and SSs will take you.
Grand Ams don't have superchargers - S2000 all the way.
Grand Prix GTPs and Bonneville SSEis will be pretty close.
Most trucks wouldn't touch you. They have more hp, but that doesn't usually make up for the massive weight they have. A Lightning should take you.
I believe the S2000 is faster than the RX-8, and about equal with a 350Z.
I think that about covers it.
I sure wish my car was newer
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,448
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis, Mo
Rep Power: 364 




You've got to remember, however, the S2000 can only accelerate as fast as you can get it to. So if you can't shift worth a darn, your 11.8 weight to power ratio and all that other stuff means nothing.
Registered!!
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington, US
Rep Power: 0 
i wouldnt worry about which cars can beat u and such, i'd get a car that im comfortable with and go from there. theres always a car or cars faster than wat you drive, u have to live with it
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 










white2K2EX, thanks, that was awesome. I approved your post 
I think the S2000 is faster than an RX-8, too.
hmmm...
I think the S2000 is faster than an RX-8, too.
hmmm...
Registered!!
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North York, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 0 
What's misleading about the S2000's performance figures is that you have to be a jedi launch-and-shift master to match them. Last summer at the track I took a run in my brother's '97 Z-28. I turned a 14.15 on my first try (he usually clocks in at around 13.8). Mind you the S2000 is 10X as fun to drive, in my opinion.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 










Well in Car and Driver I think they said the S2000 had a 1/4 mile time of 15.5, and then Road and Track or something said 14.6. I was like whoa, that's a big difference. The 0-60 numbers were also different like that.
I was looking over at the automotive forums and read this:
didn't understand this
"
Joined: Nov 2001
Status: online
Posts: 2,468
11-01-2003, 02:00 AM
(Post #3)
even though the S2000 posted up faster 1/4 mile time, faster slalom speed, higher cornering G's, and better braking, the Z convertable still was over 1 second faster on the track then the S2000. why you ask? csaue the Z has a better engine thta can pull the car out of any low speed corner where in the S2000 once you hit a 20mph corner it fall off v-tec in first gear, and then the car falls flat on its face and it takes a while for it to get back into the powerband"
The Z has a faster track time? I wonder if it was two different drivers
didn't understand this
"
Joined: Nov 2001
Status: online
Posts: 2,468
11-01-2003, 02:00 AM
(Post #3)
even though the S2000 posted up faster 1/4 mile time, faster slalom speed, higher cornering G's, and better braking, the Z convertable still was over 1 second faster on the track then the S2000. why you ask? csaue the Z has a better engine thta can pull the car out of any low speed corner where in the S2000 once you hit a 20mph corner it fall off v-tec in first gear, and then the car falls flat on its face and it takes a while for it to get back into the powerband"
The Z has a faster track time? I wonder if it was two different drivers
I've ridden in my friends s2000, and holy **** does that thing kick ***. First off... that thing is light. The door don't weigh a damn thing, and the hood is practically the same. Seond, a 9000rpm redline, with vtec from 6500rpm... (I think). The suspension is really good too. It accelerates with a simple tap of your foot and the seats in that car just comform to your body. That thing is truely an amazing machine. I really want to get one, and probably by next year I will get an 03.
Escaped Convict
iTrader: (30)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,450
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, California, US
Rep Power: 368 

well if you can hit below 14s (high 13s) cuz that's what s2k do stock..
and any car that can hit below high 13s easily are cars that can eat the s2k for breakfast.
basically lots of cars out there really. its only a 32-34k after all.
and its hard as hell imo to get that 0-60 right to break 14s
and any car that can hit below high 13s easily are cars that can eat the s2k for breakfast.
basically lots of cars out there really. its only a 32-34k after all.
and its hard as hell imo to get that 0-60 right to break 14s
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Rep Power: 306 
Originally posted by cdmx
I was looking over at the automotive forums and read this:
didn't understand this
"
Joined: Nov 2001
Status: online
Posts: 2,468
11-01-2003, 02:00 AM
(Post #3)
even though the S2000 posted up faster 1/4 mile time, faster slalom speed, higher cornering G's, and better braking, the Z convertable still was over 1 second faster on the track then the S2000. why you ask? csaue the Z has a better engine thta can pull the car out of any low speed corner where in the S2000 once you hit a 20mph corner it fall off v-tec in first gear, and then the car falls flat on its face and it takes a while for it to get back into the powerband"
The Z has a faster track time? I wonder if it was two different drivers
I was looking over at the automotive forums and read this:
didn't understand this
"
Joined: Nov 2001
Status: online
Posts: 2,468
11-01-2003, 02:00 AM
(Post #3)
even though the S2000 posted up faster 1/4 mile time, faster slalom speed, higher cornering G's, and better braking, the Z convertable still was over 1 second faster on the track then the S2000. why you ask? csaue the Z has a better engine thta can pull the car out of any low speed corner where in the S2000 once you hit a 20mph corner it fall off v-tec in first gear, and then the car falls flat on its face and it takes a while for it to get back into the powerband"
The Z has a faster track time? I wonder if it was two different drivers
My car's similar in that I have to keep it in boost between shifts. . . the Z really is a force to be reckoned with, regardless of what you put up against it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 










Originally posted by O1Coupe
You shouldn't have bought an S2K for a dragster.... it's not its game. Try a race track....... that's where it shines.
You shouldn't have bought an S2K for a dragster.... it's not its game. Try a race track....... that's where it shines.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 










Originally posted by IronFist
Now I know that exotics and such will be able to beat me.
Now I know that exotics and such will be able to beat me.
Originally posted by dalaw
Mclaren, Enzo, and the new Bugatti with like 1000 hp. Nothing will beat them.
Mclaren, Enzo, and the new Bugatti with like 1000 hp. Nothing will beat them.
Originally posted by Yukonart
. . . the Z really is a force to be reckoned with, regardless of what you put up against it.
. . . the Z really is a force to be reckoned with, regardless of what you put up against it.
Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 0
From: Jersey Shore
Rep Power: 311 




Originally posted by O1Coupe
You shouldn't have bought an S2K for a dragster.... it's not its game. Try a race track....... that's where it shines.
You shouldn't have bought an S2K for a dragster.... it's not its game. Try a race track....... that's where it shines.
).At the very least it'll hold it's own against the evo, sti, wrx ect... It should come down to the best driver on a track against those cars. On Car & Driver TV they had a big race among small performance cars that included 0-60, 60-0, road course, slalom, and quarter mile. The S2000 won overall beating the evo, sti, wrx, SRT-4, civic Si, and a hopped up focus. Now obviously this is subjective because there were different drivers, but it at least goes to show that you can beat most anyone in an s2000 provided you can drive.
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Rep Power: 306 
Originally posted by MatrixShark
It was fun (this summer) to make a new Z look silly with a Ford Lightning.
It was fun (this summer) to make a new Z look silly with a Ford Lightning.
Can you say tire squeal and out of control?

The Z is a track car. . .not a drag race machine. Also look at the rest of my post. The entire context was in regards to its competitors. . . . (Price range, configuration, etc)
Trucks don't factor-into that equation too well. . . . because, simply, they cannot compete with a sportscar for what a sportscar is designed to do.

Sure. . . I'll take on anything on the dragstrip. . . . just gimme a souped-up Polaris snowmobile and I'll eat everything alive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zygrene
6th Generation Civic 1996 - 2000
1
Mar 22, 2016 12:36 PM
Blazz
Electrical, Wiring, and In Car Entertainment
4
Aug 30, 2015 11:07 PM





