I need a new intake!!
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Rep Power: 0 
I need a new intake!!
Hey guys
i Have a generic sri for my ex and its a piece of crap, where the bracket is welded to the pipe broke off and my intake is bouncing around everywhere. So I need to get a new SRI I'm thinking either AEM, Injen or FIPK2. I know this has been covered before and i know that most people think the fipk2 is the best, but the thing is its so expensive and its not like i will see great gains. So i was wondering what one is the loudest and sounds the throatiest?? I might be leaning towards the AEM, Injen let me know i want to get one soon.
Thanks for your help
i Have a generic sri for my ex and its a piece of crap, where the bracket is welded to the pipe broke off and my intake is bouncing around everywhere. So I need to get a new SRI I'm thinking either AEM, Injen or FIPK2. I know this has been covered before and i know that most people think the fipk2 is the best, but the thing is its so expensive and its not like i will see great gains. So i was wondering what one is the loudest and sounds the throatiest?? I might be leaning towards the AEM, Injen let me know i want to get one soon.
Thanks for your help
Hail to the king baby
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Rep Power: 315 

FIPK II is more thraty sounding. AME is more high pitched.
Research this topic and and you will find from the dyno results that K&N gave 4.2 hp
while the others all gave around 2 hp
Research this topic and and you will find from the dyno results that K&N gave 4.2 hp
while the others all gave around 2 hp
Originally posted by kjgracing
FIPK II is more thraty sounding. AME is more high pitched.
Research this topic and and you will find from the dyno results that K&N gave 4.2 hp
while the others all gave around 2 hp
FIPK II is more thraty sounding. AME is more high pitched.
Research this topic and and you will find from the dyno results that K&N gave 4.2 hp
while the others all gave around 2 hp
but if you just want the sound...go for the AEM SRI....u won't have to worry about hydrolock that way...one less thing to think of...
Originally posted by briggzy
Hey SLeePeRCIVICHopeful
why is the fipk2 better, i mean what do you like about it thats better than the AEM, and which one is louder
Hey SLeePeRCIVICHopeful
why is the fipk2 better, i mean what do you like about it thats better than the AEM, and which one is louder
So, long story short: SOUND: AEM>FIPK2
PERFORMANCE: AEM<FIPK2
PRICE: AEM>FIPK2
VALUE (to me at least): AEM<FIPK2
Hope this helps! Good luck on choosing!
Hail to the king baby
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Rep Power: 315 

dyno
Sorry my bad it is 4.8 hp.
I like the K&N FIPK II better than the AME CAI I had installed because the
K & N FIPKJ II is made of a thick plastic that does not conduct heat.
THE AEM CAI piping gets so hot to the touch from radiant engine temps that it will take your fingerprints offf.
AEM was more tingy sounding.
it helped out in the top end
K & N FIPK II helped in the lower end helping bringing down my 1/4 mile times and would mage the tires chirp in 3 gears
if you have an automatic just get an AEM SRI. i say AEM because they are cheaper than Injen and FIPK, also I/H/E on our engines give us very minimal gains. the money to HP ratio is pretty bad.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
ThatGuy913
Archive - Wanted Parts (WTB's)
1
Nov 9, 2015 06:31 AM
juicetayne
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
2
Sep 30, 2015 11:02 AM
thaler4cuse
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
6
Sep 7, 2015 08:25 PM




