4 channel to components
Thread Starter
Registered!!
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: newport news, Virginia, US
Rep Power: 0 
4 channel to components
does it make any sense to run a 4 channel amp to 1 component set, to me seems like 1 component set should just need a 2 channel but i think the shop i was at was tryin to sucker me into getting a 4 channel amp
"caps go with amps for current draw"
"speakers perform better with dynamat"
"component sets sound better bi-amped"
classic sales pitches. thats one of the first things i was taught when i got a job at an audio shop. you sell them an amp, you sell them a wire kit. you sell them a subwoofer, you sell them a box. you sell them speakers, you sell them trim rings, spacers, cups, and dynamat.
its all a sales technique to get you to spend more money.
more control over your component speakers? yes. better sounding? it can be, but so can running them off 2 channels, too. my component set runs off an active crossover. i have no choice but to bi-amp my set. yours i assume came with a passive crossover, there is no need to bi-amp, yet many higher end sets now come with the ability to do so. there is no real advantage, exept more attenuation control (that -3dB tweeter thing) but if you dont have problems with that, there is no need to run a 4 channel amp to your set.
"speakers perform better with dynamat"
"component sets sound better bi-amped"
classic sales pitches. thats one of the first things i was taught when i got a job at an audio shop. you sell them an amp, you sell them a wire kit. you sell them a subwoofer, you sell them a box. you sell them speakers, you sell them trim rings, spacers, cups, and dynamat.
its all a sales technique to get you to spend more money.
more control over your component speakers? yes. better sounding? it can be, but so can running them off 2 channels, too. my component set runs off an active crossover. i have no choice but to bi-amp my set. yours i assume came with a passive crossover, there is no need to bi-amp, yet many higher end sets now come with the ability to do so. there is no real advantage, exept more attenuation control (that -3dB tweeter thing) but if you dont have problems with that, there is no need to run a 4 channel amp to your set.
I have a 4 channel amp th front 2 channels are for my highs (tweeters and midrange through crossovers) and the other 2 channels are bridged for a sub. i am glad I had a four channel because before I had my sub I had the mids through channel b and the highs through channel a. I added to my system w/ out buying a new amp. If you are planning to expand your system you can't go wrong w/ a 4 channel. A lot of peopl will disagre because they want SPL but for our cars 1 10 I found was a good mix of bass and treble if the box is built right.
link to what I have
link to what I have
The LA Clipper
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, California, US
Rep Power: 346 






Get a 2 channel amp dude! There is no need to bi-amp your speakers. The only reason I do with mine is to send more power to my mids then my tweets, because my tweets are mounted high. If you bought a 4 channel amp you will have to bridge it anyway, which may give you slightly less sound quality.
my amp is only bridged on b channel there is no need to bridge a four channel amp for tweeters. origanally before my sub I had channel a hooked to 4 tweeters which is one pair per the front channel. and b channel had 4 midrange which also is one pair per each rear channel. So Fonto i don't understand why you say you would have to bridge it anyway, there is no reason to bridge.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zygrene
6th Generation Civic 1996 - 2000
1
Mar 22, 2016 12:36 PM
Wankenstein
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
11
Sep 27, 2015 11:33 AM




