Rep Power: 0

which is better? i checked the dynos for both...but...the problem is the aem dyno says that the stock wheel hp of the si is 130 and the gain will be to 146....the injen dyno says the stock wheel is 137 and the gain will be to 144...anyone have either of these intakes? tell me the real differences

 
Rep Power: 0

WRONG FORUM..........
Plus I think they are K series engine. Not a D series. We gain 2-3whp at the most.

 
Rep Power: 333

aem v2 vs injen cai... isnt the v2 just an extended short ram intake? if so, injen CAI > aem v2.

ive heard couple stories about members here that ran the v2 and had problems with it, welds cracked, broke, etc. as for injen cai, no complaints ive read of ever.

injen CAI imo. but then again, intakes dont yield high power for the 'powerful' d17 powerplant


ive had an aem short ram v2 on the rsx, that piece i could really notice power in.

 
Rep Power: 0

no it was for the SI...so if the injen is better...why did it get such a bad dyno? but i suppose i will go with the injen cold air

 
Rep Power: 0

if you don't want to deal with the mount breaking on the intake, go with injen

 
Rep Power: 383

aem v2 your talking about one for a k20a3 of course its going to say about 130 whp but all base dynos are different, but still i would trust them, and it was only on our car that the mounting bracket broke and they fixed it free of charge

 
Rep Power: 413

I concur.