I'm looking for some dyno numbers?
#31
Turbo Guru
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 4,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 326
Originally Posted by ctx66
You just dont get it. I'm well aware of the differences in power you can get from changing ignition timing. Yes, you will make more power with the ems over the s-afc. Thats not what im arguing. What i dont like is that people think the ems is some magical tool that will give them substantial hp gains.
Originally Posted by ctx66
...as far as emanage vs s-afc vs ems in making power, they all should be around the same. the only reason why you would experience much more gains would be from improper tuning. you can fine tune better with the emanage and ems. but fine tuning doesnt give you substantial gains
250 WHP, 239 TQ (stock LS, auto DSM turbo)
Summary:
Stock LS motor in a honda del-sol.
They are running the stock turbo from an automatic DSM.
I'm told there is under $1200 invested in the whole setup.
Around 8psi of boost: Its very smooth and it pulls nicely.
The cool thing here is that there was no change in the total boost pressure. They were having some boost controller issues, so we were unable to change the boost level at all. This shows the benefit of proper dyno tuning: 75whp and 40wtq gain at the same low boost level with nothing but tuning.
Yeah, this isn't just from what's on 7thgen, this is real world tuning. You can see more setups at www.serviontuning.com.
#32
I did not contradict myself anywhere. Check again.
Are you trying to tell me that by switching from a perfectly tuned s-afc, to an ems you were able to get a 75whp gain? If theres under $1200 invested, how could he run an ems? Everything else i believe, that you can build a low cost setup if you buy a used, turbo, intercooler, make your own piping, etc.
Ill say once again, my opinion is that you will not get substantial gains by switching from a s-afc to an ems. You will get more control since you are switching from a damn fuel computer to a stand alone ecu, im not that ****ing stupid. But you should not get 75whp gains unless there was something very wrong with your intial setup, especially in such a low hp setup as the one you used as an example. A ****ing guy from slowboyracing dynoed his car at 639hp using a s-afc. So if you got 75whp on a low hp setup like that.. he should get what, 400hp on his setup if he switches to an ems? Sorry, thats just not how it works. He's now at just over 700whp using a haltec. Thats reasonable. A high hp setup going from 639hp to just over 700 by switching to a standalone ecu.
This is getting to be stupid. I'm about to just say lets agree, to disagree. Because i strongly disagree with what is being said here. I may be acting like an arrogant *****, but i only do so when im 100% of myself, and im sure of this.
Are you trying to tell me that by switching from a perfectly tuned s-afc, to an ems you were able to get a 75whp gain? If theres under $1200 invested, how could he run an ems? Everything else i believe, that you can build a low cost setup if you buy a used, turbo, intercooler, make your own piping, etc.
Ill say once again, my opinion is that you will not get substantial gains by switching from a s-afc to an ems. You will get more control since you are switching from a damn fuel computer to a stand alone ecu, im not that ****ing stupid. But you should not get 75whp gains unless there was something very wrong with your intial setup, especially in such a low hp setup as the one you used as an example. A ****ing guy from slowboyracing dynoed his car at 639hp using a s-afc. So if you got 75whp on a low hp setup like that.. he should get what, 400hp on his setup if he switches to an ems? Sorry, thats just not how it works. He's now at just over 700whp using a haltec. Thats reasonable. A high hp setup going from 639hp to just over 700 by switching to a standalone ecu.
This is getting to be stupid. I'm about to just say lets agree, to disagree. Because i strongly disagree with what is being said here. I may be acting like an arrogant *****, but i only do so when im 100% of myself, and im sure of this.
#33
Turbo Guru
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 4,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 326
Yes, you will make more power with the ems over the s-afc.
...as far as emanage vs s-afc vs ems in making power, they all should be around the same.
I would show more examples but I think my point has been proven a few times over.
#34
Yes, i did say they should be around the same. I said that you will be able to fine tune better with an ems or any other stand alone ecu, but the gains won't be substantial. If the gains aren't subtantial, then the hp #'s will still be around the same. I guess what i see as 'around', and what you see as 'around' could just be different. Unless you start discussing high hp applications of 300whp +, then the gains will become more substantial and they will no longer be 'around' the same.
This thread is stressing me out far too much, i'm not gonna reply anymore.
This thread is stressing me out far too much, i'm not gonna reply anymore.
#35
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: HOCO MARYLAND
Age: 39
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 257 You gave one example of how a car gained 61 hp. Other cars gain like 75whp maybe more. I dont see where the gains are not substantial. Also, you contradict yourself by saying that the ems does not offer substantial gains, while at the same time you state that adjusting the timing can allow you to run more boost, giving you more power, and the ems allows you to manipulate timing.
Considering the other features on the ems and the increase in power, it is worth it.
Considering the other features on the ems and the increase in power, it is worth it.
Last edited by jackburton; 07-25-2006 at 12:38 AM.
#36
Abortion Survivor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Az
Age: 36
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 269
Originally Posted by Michalo187
hahahahaha EASIER????? maybe cheaper but it would never be easier in a million years.
Install Safc- Splicing wires and **** to make it work
Install Ems- Plug and play
Tuning options on Safc
Tuning options on Ems
The way a 7thgen runs boost with Safc-
The way a turbo 7thgen runs boost with Aem Ems-
Believe me ask anyone on the forum with the ems... It makes your life way easier and makes the car feel way better and haul more ***. Its 1500 dollars but worth every penny and have never thought less of it.
Install Safc- Splicing wires and **** to make it work
Install Ems- Plug and play
Tuning options on Safc
Tuning options on Ems
The way a 7thgen runs boost with Safc-
The way a turbo 7thgen runs boost with Aem Ems-
Believe me ask anyone on the forum with the ems... It makes your life way easier and makes the car feel way better and haul more ***. Its 1500 dollars but worth every penny and have never thought less of it.
#37
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Middleboro,MA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 273 I agree with andy. I gained 20 whp at minimum just by adding my EMS. A "perfectly tuned" safc is pretty much almost impossible when the maps you are modifying are not designed to see probably at best, more that a couple pounds of boost. Not to mention all the neat features of the AEM boxesthat help extract every ounce of power and speed, whether its 1/4 mile, auto X, etc. We havent even gotten started on drivability issues. Ive had safc, emanage, and EMS on my car and other cars that I have helped build or built. As far as im concerned all the prior stuff was a joke, a hack, and the source of way too many headaches, and Id never start another Honda project without either a Hondata unit or in cases like our D17s the AEM box.
Id like to add that I have been building and/or modifying custom cars of almost every make for the last 10 years, carbureted, fuel injected, n/a, turbo, supercharged, nitrous, v8, v6, i4, bikes, race cars, tube chassis. You name it chances are I've had my name on it. Engine management, fuel and ignition setups in particular are the key to consistently make peak power. So get this, you can spend $4k+ on a turbo setup, only to spend $400 or so on half assed tuning capabilities and get the same end result as a $500 nitrous setup which will have better drivability and to some extent, fuel economy. Seems like an awful waist of 4 or 5 grand to me.
Id like to add that I have been building and/or modifying custom cars of almost every make for the last 10 years, carbureted, fuel injected, n/a, turbo, supercharged, nitrous, v8, v6, i4, bikes, race cars, tube chassis. You name it chances are I've had my name on it. Engine management, fuel and ignition setups in particular are the key to consistently make peak power. So get this, you can spend $4k+ on a turbo setup, only to spend $400 or so on half assed tuning capabilities and get the same end result as a $500 nitrous setup which will have better drivability and to some extent, fuel economy. Seems like an awful waist of 4 or 5 grand to me.
Last edited by 02fpcivic; 07-29-2006 at 07:18 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
solarpunk70
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
6
04-12-2016 11:43 AM
beanhead
Archive - Vehicles for Sale/Wanted
1
09-24-2015 12:04 PM