Good god, what a beautiful automobile!
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Largo, FL
Rep Power: 0 
Good god, what a beautiful automobile!
Tell me what you don't like about yourself....
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,576
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC, USA
Rep Power: 413 
I was wondering why he was selling the car, and the I saw that he has another one right next to it. LOL
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 1
Rep Power: 344 
:_ bow:Man i would kill everyone on this forum for one of those[IMG]i/expressions/demon.gif[/IMG][IMG]i/expressions/laugh2.gif[/IMG][IMG]i/expressions/laugh2.gif[/IMG][IMG]i/expressions/laugh2.gif[/IMG]
Registered!!
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: , Georgia, US
Rep Power: 0
Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: mattskav
The heat registers are a little ghetto for that much bean......[hr]
[hr]Originally posted by: mattskav
The heat registers are a little ghetto for that much bean......[hr]
Registered!!
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: San Bernardino, California, US
Rep Power: 0 haha i guess its one of those things where if you have to ask the price, you can't afford it? No price mentioned on website... guesses guys?[IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/IMG]
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528
Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: Intruder
They are going on 8 years old and still the worlds fastest production vehicle; not to mention still one of the most technologically advanced....[hr]
[hr]Originally posted by: Intruder
They are going on 8 years old and still the worlds fastest production vehicle; not to mention still one of the most technologically advanced....[hr]
But upon looking at the Koenigsegg website, it says it goes from 0-100km/h in 3.5 seconds, while the McLaren can do 0-60mph in 3.2.
Wait, do you think the minute difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h acconts for the .3 seconds difference in time?
Probably not.
Or did Koenigsegg say their car was the fastest car currently in production. Are they still making McLaren F1's? Someone clarify this for me.
IronFist
Registered!!
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,155
Likes: 0
From: Victoria. BC
Rep Power: 0
Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: IronFist
I thought the Königsegg claimed to be the fastest production vehicle.
But upon looking at the Koenigsegg website, it says it goes from 0-100km/h in 3.5 seconds, while the McLaren can do 0-60mph in 3.2.
Wait, do you think the minute difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h acconts for the .3 seconds difference in time?
Probably not.
Or did Koenigsegg say their car was the fastest car currently in production. Are they still making McLaren F1's? Someone clarify this for me.
IronFist[hr]
[hr]Originally posted by: IronFist
Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: Intruder
They are going on 8 years old and still the worlds fastest production vehicle; not to mention still one of the most technologically advanced....[hr]
[hr]Originally posted by: Intruder
They are going on 8 years old and still the worlds fastest production vehicle; not to mention still one of the most technologically advanced....[hr]
But upon looking at the Koenigsegg website, it says it goes from 0-100km/h in 3.5 seconds, while the McLaren can do 0-60mph in 3.2.
Wait, do you think the minute difference between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h acconts for the .3 seconds difference in time?
Probably not.
Or did Koenigsegg say their car was the fastest car currently in production. Are they still making McLaren F1's? Someone clarify this for me.
IronFist[hr]
The difference between 100kph and 60mph is 100kph = 62mph. so no. that's not worth .3 seconds difference, unless you need to shift between 60 and 62mph. lol.
but the time of 3.2 for a McLaren i've never seen before, i always read times like 3.6. But maybe, the people that own the cars, can do better than magazines. I wouldn't want to be a mag racer would I? and no, they dont' make them anymore. as far as i know they only made some tiny number of them, like 30.
The site also said he put like 250,000 dollars into the car after he bought, such as custom piping. So thats probably where some of the difference in 3.6 and 3.2 comes from
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,702
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, Other, ZEBRA
Rep Power: 528 NitehawkVTEC said:
The difference between 100kph and 60mph is 100kph = 62mph. so no. that's not worth .3 seconds difference, unless you need to shift between 60 and 62mph. lol.
but the time of 3.2 for a McLaren i've never seen before, i always read times like 3.6. But maybe, the people that own the cars, can do better than magazines. I wouldn't want to be a mag racer would I? and no, they dont' make them anymore. as far as i know they only made some tiny number of them, like 30.
And hankscorpio said:
The site also said he put like 250,000 dollars into the car after he bought, such as custom piping. So thats probably where some of the difference in 3.6 and 3.2 comes from
Thanks guys [IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/IMG] That clears it up a bit.
btw, hankscorpio, nice avatar
IronFist
The difference between 100kph and 60mph is 100kph = 62mph. so no. that's not worth .3 seconds difference, unless you need to shift between 60 and 62mph. lol.
but the time of 3.2 for a McLaren i've never seen before, i always read times like 3.6. But maybe, the people that own the cars, can do better than magazines. I wouldn't want to be a mag racer would I? and no, they dont' make them anymore. as far as i know they only made some tiny number of them, like 30.
And hankscorpio said:
The site also said he put like 250,000 dollars into the car after he bought, such as custom piping. So thats probably where some of the difference in 3.6 and 3.2 comes from
Thanks guys [IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/IMG] That clears it up a bit.
btw, hankscorpio, nice avatar
IronFist
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Largo, FL
Rep Power: 0
Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: liq
i thought the mclaren held the record for fastest top speed, not acceleration[hr]
[hr]Originally posted by: liq
i thought the mclaren held the record for fastest top speed, not acceleration[hr]
If you want to get technical I could say the Thrust SSC holds the
record for the fastest top speed @ 763mph
thrust SSC
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
civic1316
I.C.E. (Audio) & Electrical Upgrades
5
May 29, 2015 05:13 PM
autowill
1st - 5th Generation Civic 1973 - 1995
1
May 15, 2015 11:36 AM
superstanko
Mechanical Problems/Vehicle Issues and Fix-it Forum
3
Apr 28, 2015 04:38 AM
