OEM body kit contradict the purpose of a "sleeper" car?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Sep 10, 2002

#31

SoNiCcIvIc

Thread Starter

Registered!!

Joined: Dec 2001

Posts: 3,922

Likes: 0

From: Oakland, California, US

Rep Power: 0

SoNiCcIvIc is an unknown quantity at this point

Quote:

Quote
[hr]Originally posted by: n00dleboy
Make u're car fast first, then ask questions.[hr]

Okay, my car is fast. I dropped a turbo in it. It looks stock. Should I keep it looking like a sleeper? Oh wait, that was never my question in the first place. [IMG]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/IMG] My question was, "Does the OEM body kit contradict the purpose of a "sleeper?" If my car was NOT a 7th Gen Civic or more like a base model 98 Integra with an OEM body kit on it, would people assume it's still stock? This has nothing to do with making my car fast. Sigh...

Sep 10, 2002

#32

white2K2EX

I sure wish my car was newer

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 7,448

Likes: 1

From: St. Louis, Mo

Rep Power: 364

white2K2EX is a glorious beacon of light

Not to be rude, but if your username isn't HtowncivicEX, you can't even touch the word 'sleeper' right now. That is, unless you did an engine swap and didn't tell anybody. Just make it look nice.