Rep Power: 583

might be a repost, but who cares.

http://xfer.gofastvideo.com/gallery/...arif40vsf1.mpg

 
Rep Power: 584

need to get the enzo up in there

 
Rep Power: 0

i think the enzo would get owned just as badly

 
Rep Power: 343

and that was a 97 F1 car, imagine a new one.

C2i0v0i1C: on the whole enzo thing, Top gear tested a 2004 Renault F1 car around their test track, the Enzo did the track in 1:19, the F1 car did it in :59

 
Rep Power: 300

You can't compare a street legal car to a track car. An F1 car is basically an engine and a seat.

 
Rep Power: 297

+ it uses methanol fuel instead of gas

 
Rep Power: 0

dont' u get dizzy in the f1 cars with the wind, cuz ur head is sticking out of the caR? Why don't they make a plastic window thing or something like on the batmobile

 
Rep Power: 583

because if something happens the driver wont be able to get out fast enough if theres a roof overhead. this way they can just climb out. their heads are strapped in well enough, or braced at least, that they dont really jerk around that much with the wind. and the helmet helps w/ the road debris etc.

 
Rep Power: 0

^ and it's been wind tunnel tested to avoid the drivers head from being tossed around. The drivers also have special resistance training machines to help build up the neck muscles. So I would imagine that the wind doesn't seem as treacherous to those F1 drivers. And people say race car drivers aren't athletes.
I'll bet the HANS device helps too.

 
Rep Power: 0

Haha that is pretty funny. F1 is its own class.

 
Rep Power: 274

LOL...funny...

The F40 0-60 in 3.2 secs though..(quoted on top gear...) Enzo is slower than that...

 
Rep Power: 424

F1 cars run on 104 octane gasoline.