So the Accord EX and the s2000 have the same HP.
Prowlin' with a Purpose
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,239
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Rep Power: 338 
the accord is also fwd, and has a dogish tranny
altho the s2000 does have to rev quite high to get some power, the 04 s2000 has a 2.2L which gets a little more torque
teh rev limiter also has been reduced to 8500 or so
altho the s2000 does have to rev quite high to get some power, the 04 s2000 has a 2.2L which gets a little more torque
teh rev limiter also has been reduced to 8500 or so
Originally Posted by WannaBFast
the accord is also fwd, and has a dogish trann
The S2000 has a zillion times better suspension, and actually it's only a tad lighter than the Accord by a few hundred lbs (as the S2k is not that light). Still, it is rear wheel drive and instead of getting a family coupe for up to 5, you get a track-ready stock convertable that's far more capable of enjoyment riding solo or with a friend. The "soul of a sports car" powered by Honda is within the S2000.
That's my contrast.
Originally Posted by WannaBFast
well not really a big deal.. altho the s2000 achieves that power with a 2.0L I4 powerplant vs the accord uses a 3.0L v6...
The real question now is:
How different would the cars be if...
The S2000 had the 3.0L V6 AND Accord had the 2.2L I4.
Assume the S2000 stays RWD and the Accord stays FWD.
Would the cars performance stay the same or would they benefit from the change in engines?
Registered!!
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by redvtec04
so the accord reaches the same peak HP faster?? then it should beat the s2000.
Chicks dig my scent
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
From: Hickville, NC
Rep Power: 0 The S2000 makes the most n/a power per liter than any other engine out there and its still...thats what's so awesome about it, not to mention the s2k looks a lot better than the new accords, and if you've ever rode in a s2k and an accord...i think you'd make your desicion real soon on which ones better
I test drove both when I purchased my S2000. Dont get me wrong, the Accord is a very nice car, but here is why I picked the S2000. RWD, 9K RPM redline, convertible, sportier appearance. The Accord has more interior features and more room for those practical people, but I wanted more of a "sports car."
just a troll who likes to laugh at YOU.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: lafayette, IN
Rep Power: 266 i can't believe this discussion has gone on so long. y'all will pw about anything. if i weren't so bored at work, i wouldn't have read the whole thread.
hangover + work = bad
hangover + work = bad
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach, Florida, US
Rep Power: 349
Originally Posted by HondaSales
^we'll let that go since your a noob and you have a hangover
Redline Adrenaline VP
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Bossier City,LA
Rep Power: 282
Originally Posted by EternalBlue_Vic
S2000 has a quicker tranny, the advantage with a better power to weight ratio, Rear wheel driven, etc, etc
^Exactly.
Red you always make dumbass threads and ask dumbass questions.
There is clearly no help for you.
Originally Posted by civicskater
The S2000 makes the most n/a power per liter than any other engine out there and its still...thats what's so awesome about it,
