NSX, Supra or Skyline?
Second Place is the First Loser
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,469
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas, US
Rep Power: 343 


Originally posted by sadboy916
nsx because there would be to many idiots tryingh to jack the skyline.
nsx because there would be to many idiots tryingh to jack the skyline.
Skyline = AWD!! TT!!!! underated HP!!!!!.... 1K HP reachable!
NSX = ok... would keep if i won one in the lotto
Supra = dream car that is actually within reach.. if you have the cash, TT... possible 1K HP..
Skyline = ^^^ see above
Skyline for me!!!!!
Nothing works better than a Chris except a Honda.
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,346
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Rep Power: 346 





NSX. It's a car that cool enough to be a daily driver and a weekend track star. It's not as powerful as the other two, but there are a lot of tricks for tweaking it. Plus, I don't think the Skyline is street legal. I heard that Nissan will sell a street legal version here in '05.
The NSX follows a distinct philosophy compared to the other two...
Mid-engined, RWD...
Superb handling. Senna (
) developed chassis...
N/A... (I personally hate turbo's)
V6, VTEC, Honda: Lot's of RPM
The design has almost 15 years, had just a few facelifts...
But still gorgeous...
I'd take the NSX for sure...
Mid-engined, RWD...
Superb handling. Senna (
) developed chassis...N/A... (I personally hate turbo's)
V6, VTEC, Honda: Lot's of RPM
The design has almost 15 years, had just a few facelifts...
But still gorgeous...
I'd take the NSX for sure...
NSX Type R. Too much headache and hassle getting a hold of a Skyline, costs as much as an NSX, and much more aftermarket support for the NSX stateside than the Skyline. I never really wanted a Supra.



