New Facelift Ctr!!! Pics
New Facelift Ctr!!! Pics


WHATS NEW??= The new CTR looks very very nice, projector headlamps and a light weight fly wheel! Recalibrated suspension setup, Type-R logoed callipers.......
0-60 now in 6.6 secs..
Originally posted by civicvtec1ps
mirrors and new front lip is tight. those headlights and taillights doesnt look too good. 02-03 usdm stock ones are better
mirrors and new front lip is tight. those headlights and taillights doesnt look too good. 02-03 usdm stock ones are better
Search and Learn
iTrader: (34)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14,004
Likes: 0
From: 909, Socal
Rep Power: 431 




Originally posted by EBP2K2
no way, the new ones DO look much much better
no way, the new ones DO look much much better
although they did great job on new front lip
Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: Orlando (Winter Park), FL
Rep Power: 293 

whoaaaaaaaa!!! tight ish
altho, i do agree with others who say RED tails are better than clear altezza wanna-bes. too ricey IMO. all in all, i love it and wish they'd bring that crap over stateside
~Joey's 2 cents
altho, i do agree with others who say RED tails are better than clear altezza wanna-bes. too ricey IMO. all in all, i love it and wish they'd bring that crap over stateside
~Joey's 2 cents
damn is that what the 04's are gonna look like? if thats what its gonna look like then ill sell my car! or im gonna get an integra type r or gsr and turbo it with the money i get for my car. i checked edmunds.com and it said my car was worth 15k
Maybe i am old styled, but i still like the 1996-2000 civic hatch better. off the subject but why would they switch to cable shift linkage on the si?
Last edited by maxsin; Sep 2, 2003 at 03:20 AM.
Autocross Junky
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,211
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, Nevada, US
Rep Power: 380 










Still dont like it. From the B-piller forward .... Blah.. From the B-piller back its ok.
Its the Rake between the windscreen and the hood, or rather lack of rake between the two. Looks like one continuous line, and that just looks bad to me. At least with the coupe and the Sedan you can tell the difference in line between the Hood and the windscreen...
If it had the same nose as the coupe/sedan the I think I'd like it. as it stands...... nope, no thanks.
Its the Rake between the windscreen and the hood, or rather lack of rake between the two. Looks like one continuous line, and that just looks bad to me. At least with the coupe and the Sedan you can tell the difference in line between the Hood and the windscreen...
If it had the same nose as the coupe/sedan the I think I'd like it. as it stands...... nope, no thanks.
Registered!!
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Rep Power: 0 
They could have made the projectors look a lot better.......... and the rear tails look too messy. Front lower dam doesn't look too attractive either and doesn't flow with the sides.
In the end... Hatchbacks still look ugly.
In the end... Hatchbacks still look ugly.



