2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
I am interested in a newer Civic hatch, manual transmission. I was hoping to get a sport trim with the 1.5 turbo. The used ones, 2018-2021, cost as much as, and often several thousand more, than a new one, with very few manuals available. Usually no warranty is remaining. Finding or ordering a new one seems possible, but now in 2022, they are only available with the 2.0 NA engine. I was wondering if anyone with experience with both of these engines could comment on the driving difference. Not sure why Honda got rid of the 1.5 T in the "Sport" trim?
Re: 2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
From what I've read, the 1.5 is a much peppier engine than the 2.0 NA. I suspect they put the 1.5 in the more expensive trim models because that's likely the more sought-after engine, as demonstrated here.
As someone who had a higher output version of that 2.0, they're very good engines. Perhaps a bit underpowered but they're very reliable. If it's simply a commuter, that engine is more than adequate.
As someone who had a higher output version of that 2.0, they're very good engines. Perhaps a bit underpowered but they're very reliable. If it's simply a commuter, that engine is more than adequate.
Re: 2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
I currently drive an 09 EX but I’m looking to buy a 2020-2022 Civic. I want to like the Sport trim but the engine HP is stopping me.
I have two questions:
is the HP difference significantly noticeable?
and is the 2.0 non turbo more reliable!
thanks for any comments
Jim
I have two questions:
is the HP difference significantly noticeable?
and is the 2.0 non turbo more reliable!
thanks for any comments
Jim
Re: 2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
Yes to both questions.
Re: 2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
I’m trying to convince myself to go with the sport over the ex for the engine reliability. But it’s tough to get past the HP difference. I’m hoping since I have an 09, the 2.0 will still accelerate faster etc.
thanks
thanks
Re: 2.0 vs. 1.5 Turbo
The low end torque from the 1.5 turbo will make it feel drastically faster.
According to zeroto60times.com, the 2016 EX with the 2.0L will do 0-60 MPH in 8.2 seconds and a quarter mile in 16.4 seconds. The EX-L with the 1.5L turbo takes 6.6 seconds and 15.1 seconds respectively. For comparison, your 09 EX is listed at 9.4 and 17.1.
The 1.5 turbo engines definitely aren't unreliable, just maybe not as reliable as the 2.0L.
According to zeroto60times.com, the 2016 EX with the 2.0L will do 0-60 MPH in 8.2 seconds and a quarter mile in 16.4 seconds. The EX-L with the 1.5L turbo takes 6.6 seconds and 15.1 seconds respectively. For comparison, your 09 EX is listed at 9.4 and 17.1.
The 1.5 turbo engines definitely aren't unreliable, just maybe not as reliable as the 2.0L.
Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxpeedingrods
Retail Sales - site vendor annoucements
0
Dec 21, 2021 11:52 PM
Maxpeedingrods
Retail Sales - site vendor annoucements
0
Sep 17, 2021 02:21 AM






