headers
Originally Posted by mkingk2
Don't believe everything u hear caorndorff, when I talk about revving high, I mean 9-11k. I have seen both sohc and dohc motors in range.
These guys don't make peak hp anywhere close to 6200-6300 rpms.
I don't remember his name but there is someone on this site that has his d17 revving easily past 9k.
These guys don't make peak hp anywhere close to 6200-6300 rpms.
I don't remember his name but there is someone on this site that has his d17 revving easily past 9k.
http://www.7thgencivic.com/forums/sh...ghlight=turkey
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





Originally Posted by caorndorff
Yes, yes it dose. Because the engine is inefficient at that point. But all aside even if you could make a d17 rev up high, it would blow up. The valve springs are not stiff enough, the rods are too small, and the list goes on and on and on.
Go on Honda-tech.com and tell them you want to build a high revving d17. This will he their reaction
Here look at this n/a d17 dyno
http://www.kandn.com/dynocharts/57-3513.jpg
Only too guesses to where the horsepower is heading after 6200
Here is a hint

Go on Honda-tech.com and tell them you want to build a high revving d17. This will he their reaction
Here look at this n/a d17 dyno
http://www.kandn.com/dynocharts/57-3513.jpg
Only too guesses to where the horsepower is heading after 6200
Here is a hint

Yes you are correct, no need to rev hell out of the engine to ge it going fast. Some engines will rev higer then others.
In case of D vs K.
K rev easier because it is "undersquare engine" - bore dimention is larger then stroke. These engines are very good in making top end power.
So when engine is revved up the pistion speed is lower then in "oversquare engine" (D17). Lower piston speed means less vibrations, so less chance of damage safer at high rpms
D17 is "oversquare engine", bore is smaller then stroke. These engines are better suited for low-mid power and tq.
At any given point d17 piston speed will move faster from dead center to dead center compare to K. So D produces more vibrations, so it has increased chances of "blowing up" if rev past factory redline.
If properly prepared - d17 - with ballanced: crank shafts, pistons, rods, valves, with stiffer valve springs and ported head - d17 will become very ballanced can rev very well beyond factory redline and it will produce good #'s. Very expencive and not very common route.
.....Also, refering to the dyno that you postel link for....
I'm thinking that all of you guys, already know that acceleration is very dependant on power, more hp = faster acceleration.
Take a look at the graph. If you shift to next gear at 6200 rpm, highest hp (follow blue line), then you RPM will drop to about 5000 where engine produses 100whp, so you will accelerate from 100 whp (blue) and up.
If you will shift at 6800 rpm, with next gear you will strat accelerationg at 5600 rpms witch is about 110 whp (blue) - you started off with 10 more whp meaning you will accelerate faster. So it does pay off to go to readline in d17.
Manufacurers set engine speed to specific limits to reach alternatives beween: good fuel economy, pollution, noise, flexibility..... engine performs well, but with sacrifices to some things.

Look for yourself guys! It should be good info fo some one talking about d vs. k scecs.
very well put i agree on that. i have seen a hole in some other posts as well. first off a dx/lx has the cat incorperated into the manifold. that means running a header on a dx/lx exhaust system means you cant have a cat unless you switch to a ex system which is what i did. you can use a 4-2-1 header with a ex with the correct midpipe. and as far as the comment about doing a lot of work to make the d17 rev to 8k is not true. i am in the process of doing headwork and a the stg 2 crower cam which includes the valve springs and retainers. this will allow you to go to 8k safely. so no the rods crank and so on do not need to be touched in order to achieve a higher rpm than stock. however it does require that you use a AEM EMS in order to remove the factory rev limiter in order to rev that high. mean piston speed has alot to do with producing power but does not come into play as much with a naturally aspirated engine because you are not pushing air into the motor causing it to rev faster, its more of a consistant draw. now there are SOHC motors that would surprise you guys. that is why i decided to build this motor instead of a swap. everyone wants a swap and no one is willing to make the ol d series show its true potential. realistically for the price of a swap you can build the d17 to make just about as much whp as a swap. just like any motor people think it has no potential because they have not actually done any mods beyond what they can bolt on. to see any true potential out of a motor you will need to massage the head a bit and do some internal work. i have seen 1.5l SOHC motors put down 300+hp. that is 200hp per liter. now if that isnt impressive i dont know what is.
Cool post man
Originally Posted by familycar
very well put i agree on that. i have seen a hole in some other posts as well. first off a dx/lx has the cat incorperated into the manifold. that means running a header on a dx/lx exhaust system means you cant have a cat unless you switch to a ex system which is what i did. you can use a 4-2-1 header with a ex with the correct midpipe. and as far as the comment about doing a lot of work to make the d17 rev to 8k is not true. i am in the process of doing headwork and a the stg 2 crower cam which includes the valve springs and retainers. this will allow you to go to 8k safely. so no the rods crank and so on do not need to be touched in order to achieve a higher rpm than stock. however it does require that you use a AEM EMS in order to remove the factory rev limiter in order to rev that high. mean piston speed has alot to do with producing power but does not come into play as much with a naturally aspirated engine because you are not pushing air into the motor causing it to rev faster, its more of a consistant draw. now there are SOHC motors that would surprise you guys. that is why i decided to build this motor instead of a swap. everyone wants a swap and no one is willing to make the ol d series show its true potential. realistically for the price of a swap you can build the d17 to make just about as much whp as a swap. just like any motor people think it has no potential because they have not actually done any mods beyond what they can bolt on. to see any true potential out of a motor you will need to massage the head a bit and do some internal work. i have seen 1.5l SOHC motors put down 300+hp. that is 200hp per liter. now if that isnt impressive i dont know what is.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 20
From: NV
Rep Power: 811 










ported tb and exhaust. then save $2k for dezod turbo. everything else useless. pnp is prolly the best mod but it will cost $1k for 10whp.
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





Originally Posted by StealthCivic
Hey man, I like your way of thinking...what is the first internal mod I can step into? I want to work on the core...I have just about given up and bought a new si, but I would rather not get another loan, and just tinker with my paid off vic, but I want to do some gaining mods , not bolt ons that gain 1-2 hp...

everyone wants a swap and no one is willing to make the ol d series show its true potential. realistically for the price of a swap you can build the d17 to make just about as much whp as a swap. just like any motor people think it has no potential because they have not actually done any mods beyond what they can bolt on. to see any true potential out of a motor you will need to massage the head a bit and do some internal work.
I'd love n/a d17, but imagine how much money you will spend to get same gain as generic t.kit (~60hp).
To get power in n/a, you will need to move a lot of air through the engine to make power, make engine to rev high past 8k, 9000+ rpm (moto engine is an example)
N/A (general $ figures)- $350 cam (ex only), $300 spring reatainer kit, $1200 AEM EMS , $500 header w/full cat back, $800 PnP head, $800 weight&ballance rods and crankshaft (poss new set of light custom rods = more $$), $600 high comp pistons, $? light valves, $? light camshaft - this is just basics...
Dont forget, you also need to work on gearbox to to withstand hig RPMs - ballancing all shafts, so they dont dissinigrade under load from vibration at high rotating speed....
Plus labour costs and tunning
This set up will have big n/a gain, I cant even estimate hp gain.
You need a lot of courage to get where you want. Yes, you right not many people has done it for obvious reasons. Someone has to try it.
Last edited by 03-Acura-1.7-EL; Jan 1, 2006 at 10:40 PM.
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





Originally Posted by StealthCivic
Thanks for the advice...don't really want to lose gas mileage, will pnp, bored tb, exaust, and turbo cause me to lose gas mileage?
Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL
Turbo kit, exhaust, clutch, wider tires....about $4k in parts = 60ish hp gain 
Its all comedown to cost vs. gain
I'd love n/a d17, but imagine how much money you will spend to get same gain as generic t.kit (~60hp).
To get power in n/a, you will need to move a lot of air through the engine to make power, make engine to rev high past 8k, 9000+ rpm (moto engine is an example)
N/A (general $ figures)- $350 cam (ex only), $300 spring reatainer kit, $1200 AEM EMS , $500 header w/full cat back, $800 PnP head, $800 weight&ballance rods and crankshaft (poss new set of light custom rods = more $$), $600 high comp pistons, $? light valves, $? light camshaft - this is just basics...
Dont forget, you also need to work on gearbox to to withstand hig RPMs - ballancing all shafts, so they dont dissinigrade under load from vibration at high rotating speed....
Plus labour costs and tunning
This set up will have big n/a gain, I cant even estimate hp gain.
You need a lot of courage to get where you want. Yes, you right not many people has done it for obvious reasons. Someone has to try it.

Its all comedown to cost vs. gain
I'd love n/a d17, but imagine how much money you will spend to get same gain as generic t.kit (~60hp).
To get power in n/a, you will need to move a lot of air through the engine to make power, make engine to rev high past 8k, 9000+ rpm (moto engine is an example)
N/A (general $ figures)- $350 cam (ex only), $300 spring reatainer kit, $1200 AEM EMS , $500 header w/full cat back, $800 PnP head, $800 weight&ballance rods and crankshaft (poss new set of light custom rods = more $$), $600 high comp pistons, $? light valves, $? light camshaft - this is just basics...
Dont forget, you also need to work on gearbox to to withstand hig RPMs - ballancing all shafts, so they dont dissinigrade under load from vibration at high rotating speed....
Plus labour costs and tunning
This set up will have big n/a gain, I cant even estimate hp gain.
You need a lot of courage to get where you want. Yes, you right not many people has done it for obvious reasons. Someone has to try it.
Last edited by familycar; Jan 3, 2006 at 12:47 PM.
Once boosted now i-VTEC
iTrader: (16)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL
Need to correct you on few things here.
Yes you are correct, no need to rev hell out of the engine to ge it going fast. Some engines will rev higer then others.
In case of D vs K.
K rev easier because it is "undersquare engine" - bore dimention is larger then stroke. These engines are very good in making top end power.
So when engine is revved up the pistion speed is lower then in "oversquare engine" (D17). Lower piston speed means less vibrations, so less chance of damage safer at high rpms
D17 is "oversquare engine", bore is smaller then stroke. These engines are better suited for low-mid power and tq.
At any given point d17 piston speed will move faster from dead center to dead center compare to K. So D produces more vibrations, so it has increased chances of "blowing up" if rev past factory redline.
If properly prepared - d17 - with ballanced: crank shafts, pistons, rods, valves, with stiffer valve springs and ported head - d17 will become very ballanced can rev very well beyond factory redline and it will produce good #'s. Very expencive and not very common route.
Yes you are correct, no need to rev hell out of the engine to ge it going fast. Some engines will rev higer then others.
In case of D vs K.
K rev easier because it is "undersquare engine" - bore dimention is larger then stroke. These engines are very good in making top end power.
So when engine is revved up the pistion speed is lower then in "oversquare engine" (D17). Lower piston speed means less vibrations, so less chance of damage safer at high rpms
D17 is "oversquare engine", bore is smaller then stroke. These engines are better suited for low-mid power and tq.
At any given point d17 piston speed will move faster from dead center to dead center compare to K. So D produces more vibrations, so it has increased chances of "blowing up" if rev past factory redline.
If properly prepared - d17 - with ballanced: crank shafts, pistons, rods, valves, with stiffer valve springs and ported head - d17 will become very ballanced can rev very well beyond factory redline and it will produce good #'s. Very expencive and not very common route.

Also all honda cranks are ballanced, infact all cranks are ballanced period.
Last edited by caorndorff; Jan 3, 2006 at 01:53 PM.
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 






I dont want to build d17 n/a - way expensive, I also already have my d17 turboed for a...while
Yes, this was just a general list of parts that needed for n/a build...
As far as ballancing, yes, they do come ballanced, no argument about it, I should've elaborate on this, as to ballance it for higher tolerence, since engine will be revving past manufacturers recomendation...
oversquare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversquare
undersquare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undersquare
Last edited by 03-Acura-1.7-EL; Jan 3, 2006 at 03:37 PM.
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





familycar
Yes, you right, you dont need to use all your available options to get you to 140whp, in fact its quite possible and doable without great expence....GSR intake mani is way better flowing piece than d17 IM, but as I've read it a little complex to set it up with d17. d16 is easier to install, as far as I remember it almost direct fit (read on this board, no experience though with IM). I've set up a general list was just to give you and idea for a "crazy" n/a, so to speak....
Sorry, if I overwelmed you with info, I must've missed on your HP goal in you initial reply.
Let me know if you need some help.
Cheers!
Yes, you right, you dont need to use all your available options to get you to 140whp, in fact its quite possible and doable without great expence....GSR intake mani is way better flowing piece than d17 IM, but as I've read it a little complex to set it up with d17. d16 is easier to install, as far as I remember it almost direct fit (read on this board, no experience though with IM). I've set up a general list was just to give you and idea for a "crazy" n/a, so to speak....
Sorry, if I overwelmed you with info, I must've missed on your HP goal in you initial reply.

Let me know if you need some help.
Cheers!
Last edited by 03-Acura-1.7-EL; Jan 3, 2006 at 04:13 PM.
Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL

I dont want to build d17 n/a - way expensive, I also already have my d17 turboed for a...while
Yes, this was just a general list of parts that needed for n/a build...
As far as ballancing, yes, they do come ballanced, no argument about it, I should've elaborate on this, as to ballance it for higher tolerence, since engine will be revving past manufacturers recomendation...
oversquare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversquare
undersquare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undersquare

Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL
familycar
Yes, you right, you dont need to use all your available options to get you to 140whp, in fact its quire possible and doable without great expence....My general list was just to give you and idea for a "crazy" n/a, so to speak..
Yes, you right, you dont need to use all your available options to get you to 140whp, in fact its quire possible and doable without great expence....My general list was just to give you and idea for a "crazy" n/a, so to speak..
Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





Yeah, we are taking about different t.kits, I run TSI extreme that I've bought for $2600, made 160whp on a2, I used muffler silencer (stupid me)...
In the spring I'll make duny run with new plugs, air filter and without silencer, and my light weight rims, hopefuly will see 170whp, will see...
But, hey, if you can get parts for a good price then for shure do it! I'm with you on it!
Honestly, before turbo I was going to go n/a, but I do not have access to all hardware to work on the engine, so labour would of been a killer for me, thats why I went turbo, I put in kit myself and so fat so good...knock on wood..
In the spring I'll make duny run with new plugs, air filter and without silencer, and my light weight rims, hopefuly will see 170whp, will see...
But, hey, if you can get parts for a good price then for shure do it! I'm with you on it!
Honestly, before turbo I was going to go n/a, but I do not have access to all hardware to work on the engine, so labour would of been a killer for me, thats why I went turbo, I put in kit myself and so fat so good...knock on wood..
Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL
Yeah, we are taking about different t.kits, I run TSI extreme that I've bought for $2600, made 160whp on a2, I used muffler silencer (stupid me)...
In the spring I'll make duny run with new plugs, air filter and without silencer, and my light weight rims, hopefuly will see 170whp, will see...
But, hey, if you can get parts for a good price then for shure do it! I'm with you on it!
Honestly, before turbo I was going to go n/a, but I do not have access to all hardware to work on the engine, so labour would of been a killer for me, thats why I went turbo, I put in kit myself and so fat so good...knock on wood..

In the spring I'll make duny run with new plugs, air filter and without silencer, and my light weight rims, hopefuly will see 170whp, will see...
But, hey, if you can get parts for a good price then for shure do it! I'm with you on it!
Honestly, before turbo I was going to go n/a, but I do not have access to all hardware to work on the engine, so labour would of been a killer for me, thats why I went turbo, I put in kit myself and so fat so good...knock on wood..

Registered!!
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Rep Power: 280 





Yes, I have a basic kit with t25, intercooler and 2 extra injectors....
For sure go n/a and let us all see what it can do!
Good luck!
reped you for your big n/a plans!
For sure go n/a and let us all see what it can do!
Good luck!
reped you for your big n/a plans!
Last edited by 03-Acura-1.7-EL; Jan 3, 2006 at 06:09 PM.
Originally Posted by 03-Acura-1.7-EL
Yes, I have a basic kit with t25, intercooler and 2 extra injectors....
For sure go n/a and let us all see what it can do!
Good luck!
reped you for your big n/a plans!
For sure go n/a and let us all see what it can do!
Good luck!
reped you for your big n/a plans!
Originally Posted by blouisgod
^ you two should get a room

Thread
Thread Starter
Honda Civic Forum
Replies
Last Post
ThatGuy913
Archive - Wanted Parts (WTB's)
1
Nov 9, 2015 06:31 AM
jdh022764
7th Generation Civic 2001 - 2005
18
Nov 3, 2015 06:44 AM



Hope everything turned out ok for him 
