WTB: 2 channel amp 400x2 rms
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



WTB: 2 channel amp 400x2 rms
ok can you guys throw out some names of amps that have this much power? and im looking to spend $300. thanks for helping a noob.
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 51,077
Likes: 4
From: B.C., Canada
Rep Power: 786 










I REALLY recommend going with a monoblock amp... an amp that is actually MEANT for subs, unlike 2 and 4 channels.
If you wanna do it, at least try and do it right
If you wanna do it, at least try and do it right
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



ok sorry guys but complete noob to this ****.........cuz im gonna hook this up to 2 subs and so how would i do this with a mooblock amp? and which one would you suggest? i mean which monoblock amp would you suggest for my 2 subs(like a 350 to 400 watt rms amp?)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 51,077
Likes: 4
From: B.C., Canada
Rep Power: 786 










400 rms each or for both?
If it's for both, go with a Phoenix Gold Xenon 400.1
http://www.phoenixgold.com/2004/xenonamps.html
For 400 each go with Phoenix Gold Octane-R 8.0:1
http://www.phoenixgold.com/2004/octane-ramps.html
If it's for both, go with a Phoenix Gold Xenon 400.1
http://www.phoenixgold.com/2004/xenonamps.html
For 400 each go with Phoenix Gold Octane-R 8.0:1
http://www.phoenixgold.com/2004/octane-ramps.html
What subs ..... that makes a world of difference. Are they 8 ohm SVC, 4 ohm SVC, 2 ohm SVC, 4 ohm DVC, 2 ohm DVC, etc. ??????
The ohms of the coils and the number of the subs that you have will determine the amp that you want.
A Monoblock 2 ohm stable amp is good for .....
- one 2 ohm SVC sub
- one 4 ohm DVC sub (parallel wiring)
- two 4 ohm SVC subs (parallel wiring)
- two 2 ohm DVC subs (parallel + series wiring)
The ohms of the coils and the number of the subs that you have will determine the amp that you want.
A Monoblock 2 ohm stable amp is good for .....
- one 2 ohm SVC sub
- one 4 ohm DVC sub (parallel wiring)
- two 4 ohm SVC subs (parallel wiring)
- two 2 ohm DVC subs (parallel + series wiring)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 51,077
Likes: 4
From: B.C., Canada
Rep Power: 786 










If you get the Xenon 400.1 you won't have to worry about impedance as long as you show it a 1 ohm or above load, as it will put out the same power at any resistance.
Originally Posted by MegaHurtz
I REALLY recommend going with a monoblock amp... an amp that is actually MEANT for subs, unlike 2 and 4 channels.
If you wanna do it, at least try and do it right
If you wanna do it, at least try and do it right
The difference between a monoblock amp and a 2- or 4-channel amp is the number of channels... why do you so highly recommend only 1 channel instead of 2 or 4 for subs? What would be adversely affected by increasing the number of channels?
Or do you mean class D when you say monoblock? In which case, I can see the point if you are trying to minimize cost/heat, as a class D amp will in general give you more power for less money and less heat. There are some other advantages (better efficiency, at least when not pushed to the max; many times, the ability to handle a lower impedance), but still, I can't see how a class D amp would be "right" for subs while, say, a class A/B would be "wrong." Efficiency is not a huge deal for everyone, nor is the ability to handle a 1 ohm load...
I guess what I'm trying to say in way too many words is that I think it is extremely misleading to say that running subs off a 2- or 4-channel amp is "wrong."
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 51,077
Likes: 4
From: B.C., Canada
Rep Power: 786 










I'm not saying it's wrong, what I meant is that it's better to use an amp that is optimized for subs. You will get more efficiency that way and better sound.
I try to do my install to a certain "code" where everyything is set up that it would pass an inspection if it ever had to, much like your house has to be up to a certain code... and stuff like using mono blocks and putting zap straps on wire would be part of that code...
maybe I am a bit **** but that's the way I see things, but it helps me do clean install work
I try to do my install to a certain "code" where everyything is set up that it would pass an inspection if it ever had to, much like your house has to be up to a certain code... and stuff like using mono blocks and putting zap straps on wire would be part of that code...
maybe I am a bit **** but that's the way I see things, but it helps me do clean install work
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



here is the sub that i am gonna be running. so what do you think? the reason why i chose this is cuz my friend has 2 of these that he wants to get rid of cuz he wants to bump the new kicker l7's in his stang. so yea he was gonna give me this for like $80 with the box for 2 12's. and also i want 400 rms for each suhb and using only one amp.
Last edited by mr_fobster; Sep 9, 2004 at 07:38 PM.
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



a 2 channel isnt wrong but try gain matching a two channel amp so that your subs are phase correct and getting the same amount of power. go with a bridged 2 channel amp (800x1) or a mono amp like the members are saying.
its possible but why make things harder.
its possible but why make things harder.
i boogie for the raindrops
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, Mississippi
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by MegaHurtz
I'm not saying it's wrong, what I meant is that it's better to use an amp that is optimized for subs. You will get more efficiency that way and better sound.
I try to do my install to a certain "code" where everyything is set up that it would pass an inspection if it ever had to, much like your house has to be up to a certain code... and stuff like using mono blocks and putting zap straps on wire would be part of that code...
maybe I am a bit **** but that's the way I see things, but it helps me do clean install work
I try to do my install to a certain "code" where everyything is set up that it would pass an inspection if it ever had to, much like your house has to be up to a certain code... and stuff like using mono blocks and putting zap straps on wire would be part of that code...
maybe I am a bit **** but that's the way I see things, but it helps me do clean install work
a 2 channel amp will actually produce a cleaner, more accurate signal, hence better sound.
the topology of a class D amplifier provides so much efficiency because it doesnt actually produce the entire waveform, only a part of it. thats why we dont run class d to components. it only functions with on and off, hence the sometimes used term, digital. digital information uses 1 and 0, or on and off to transmit signal.

letter A illustrates 10% power, b is 50% power, c is 90% power
even class a/b and class T amps we see on the market still dont produce the waveform entirely, they have a small piece missing in the center. this picture is a class b amplifier, im using it as a visual exagerration about the waveform distortion. class a/b use b as a design base but take a feature from class a so as to somewhat fix the evident distortion.

again, a class a/b waveform doesnt look like this, this is a class b im using for exagerrative purposes
class a amps can produce the waveform almost perfectly, but they are burdened with a 15-20% efficiency, and sucks massive power even while not putting out a signal. of the VERY few in car class A amps available, you wont find one that does more than 20 watts by 2, and those amps cost thousands of dollars. theyre also gimongous.

disregard the arrow and stuff, i stole the image from another site
The proper subwoofer, combined with the proper install, can obviously point out the difference in sound quality between a class D mono, and an a/b amp, yet i didnt reccomend a 2 channel to him, because i can obviously tell he wont know the difference.
please raise your hand if youd like to ask a question
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: 650 (SC_RWC) CA
Rep Power: 332 

Ya This topics is perfect timing. Cause I was looking for the right type of amp to run 2 JL 12W3. ANy suggestions. not trying to take over thread, just offering another scenorio. These are suppose to run 300w RMS each. When i look for an amp for 300RMS subs, do i look at 2ohms specs????? A shop told me get this $ 650 Zapco 750.2 with specs of....
Stereo, 4 ohms: 2x175 Watts
Stereo, 2 ohms: 2x375 Watts
Bridged, 4 ohms: 1x750 Watts
T.H.D. + Noise: <0.022%
S/N Ratio: >95dB
Slew Rate: >40V/uS
Damping Factor: >1000@4 ohms
Dimensions: 23"L x 7.5"W x 2"H
Is there something else that would work just as well, but less expensive? Similar situation as Mr_fobster!
Stereo, 4 ohms: 2x175 Watts
Stereo, 2 ohms: 2x375 Watts
Bridged, 4 ohms: 1x750 Watts
T.H.D. + Noise: <0.022%
S/N Ratio: >95dB
Slew Rate: >40V/uS
Damping Factor: >1000@4 ohms
Dimensions: 23"L x 7.5"W x 2"H
Is there something else that would work just as well, but less expensive? Similar situation as Mr_fobster!
i boogie for the raindrops
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, Mississippi
Rep Power: 0 
that zapco reference 700 amp is serious overkill for your subs. theyre trying to sell you some crazy ****. im assuming theyre dual 4 ohms subs.
youd be fine with any 500-600 watt at 1 or 4 ohm amp
jl 500/1 comes to mind if you still want a high quality amp
youd be fine with any 500-600 watt at 1 or 4 ohm amp
jl 500/1 comes to mind if you still want a high quality amp
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: 650 (SC_RWC) CA
Rep Power: 332 

Originally Posted by LudlamTheory
that zapco reference 700 amp is serious overkill for your subs. theyre trying to sell you some crazy ****. im assuming theyre dual 4 ohms subs.
youd be fine with any 500-600 watt at 1 or 4 ohm amp
jl 500/1 comes to mind if you still want a high quality amp
youd be fine with any 500-600 watt at 1 or 4 ohm amp
jl 500/1 comes to mind if you still want a high quality amp
It didn't seem right, but the JL 500/1 I've been told could work for 2 subs, right?
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: 650 (SC_RWC) CA
Rep Power: 332 

Originally Posted by LudlamTheory
jl 500/1 comes to mind if you still want a high quality amp
Originally Posted by LudlamTheory
could work for 1 sub, 2 subs, 186 subs, 3,465,934 subs
all bout wiring them correctly
all bout wiring them correctly
How bout a nice Kac X401M?? I got one hardly used.
Anyway, its also important to know what exact 12w3 you got.
Is it a vers 1 or a Vers 2
Dual 2 ohm, Dual 4 ohm or Dual 6 ohm
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,209
Likes: 0
From: 650 (SC_RWC) CA
Rep Power: 332 

**** I was looking to buy the v2 but not sure on the ohms. What's better. the one I found was here...JL 12w3 from Woofersetc.com
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



ok my audio guy that i usually talk to(sort of like a family friend) he says if im want to power my subs with the power that i was talking about, cuz my subs i am getting are like 400 watt rms, is a mtx thunder421D amp:
http://www.mtxaudio.com/caraudio/pro...hunder421D.cfm
and he was gonna power it with a 2 ohm load = 420x1
any suggestions? comments would be helpful?
http://www.mtxaudio.com/caraudio/pro...hunder421D.cfm
and he was gonna power it with a 2 ohm load = 420x1
any suggestions? comments would be helpful?
Registered!!
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1
From: Cleveland, OH
Rep Power: 329 




yeah 2 ohm would give each sub 210W. you said you wanted 400W to each. i know MTX makes a mono one that puts out 775W at 2 ohms (damn close to 400W each), but the model escapes me. 810D maybe? 81000D? 8100D? something like that...
Thread Starter
Registered!!
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 0
From: vallejo, cali (nor cal)
Rep Power: 294 



Originally Posted by DoubleDeuce2k2
yeah 2 ohm would give each sub 210W. you said you wanted 400W to each. i know MTX makes a mono one that puts out 775W at 2 ohms (damn close to 400W each), but the model escapes me. 810D maybe? 81000D? 8100D? something like that...
yea its the 810d, but on the 421d i showed you guys cant i power it to 420x1? cuz it shows that in the dynamic power14.4 VDC? cuz if i get that one my audio guy said he would make it so that it will be pushing out that much power? i dont get what its saying about the rms power and the dynamic power. could someone please help me out here on that? thanks!


