In your opinion, AEM or Injen?

Subscribe
Jul 12, 2003
  #1  
In your opinions which short ram intake do you thing is better? AEM or Injen. and Im not just talking about HP increase, Sound, looks....everything.
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #2  
No SRI, ONLY CAI
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #3  
here comes the fights again.....

AEM vs. Injen

Greddy vs. Tanabe

DC Sports vs. HP
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #4  
What about the:
SRI vs. CAI fight?
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #5  
AEM CAI... all the way, check out the top of the list in reviews... says it all
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #6  
yeah i will have to say aem cai i felt the difference in pick up after i changed from the sri in first , second , and third
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #7  
i liked my injen cai and sri
Reply 0
Jul 12, 2003
  #8  
Well I was definatly considering it but, 1 I live in florida ( VERY bad place to have a cai) and 2 my friend with a 02 lancer had one, it stated raining, and he filled up a cylinder ( car go boom, boom) so cai is out. and im trying to argue, but in your opinions which is better in sri form?
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #9  
injen in my opinion is better in sri
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #10  
you could always get a bypass too
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #11  
injen no doubt! JMO
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #12  
Oh jeez... its a filter on a bent stick. Pick one.
Apparently K&N is the "best" according to people... but that may give you a 0.0000001% gain over the other.
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #13  
you can defintely feel the difference with a filter on a bent stick I am so used to my cai i took it off and put my stock one and it feels all ghetto and i dunno how to explain it.
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #14  
my honest opinion, i like sri. just incase i doesn't suck up any water. and injen. i like the polished look
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #15  
injen CAI w/ aem bypass valve
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #16  
Quote:
Originally posted by Weaponx12o
injen CAI w/ aem bypass valve
i was thinking of this setup myself. wonder how hard it is to install the AEM bypass on the injen, have to chop the pipe?
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #17  
yes you have to cut the pipe, i think its like that for the AEM CAI too
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #18  
yup same thing for the AEM I've got the AEM cai with the bypass its been workin out well, but definitely get a bypass if you get cai, CRUCIAL
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #19  
Injen!
Reply 0
Jul 13, 2003
  #20  
I prefer Injen.
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #21  
AEM v2 for the most dyno hp to date

atleast thats what the website says
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #22  
Quote:
Originally posted by Boilermaker1
Oh jeez... its a filter on a bent stick. Pick one.
Apparently K&N is the "best" according to people... but that may give you a 0.0000001% gain over the other.
Thank you. They're all the same. The design of the intake is futile. The most important part is the air filter.

Bypass valves DON'T WORK.

And V2 is proven market hype.
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #23  
The V2 seems like it wouldn't really make a difference over the regular AEM CAI. the two sized of pipe shouldn't change anything much. if anything you'd think it'd slow down the velocity.

The thing about the Injen is that it's metal. Metal gets really hot in the engine compartment. hot CAI = hot air, hot air = less power.
the AEM is plastic which doesn't get as hot as metal. just a theory.
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #24  
SlammedBlueEM2: So are you saying that you would rather stay with the stock air box?

Boilermaker1: Since it is just "a filter on a bent stick," why did you buy an Injen CAI?
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #25  
I'm just waiting for Injen to jump onto this thread.
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #26  
Quote:
Originally posted by GideoN
SlammedBlueEM2: So are you saying that you would rather stay with the stock air box?
I'm not implying anything about the stock air box but if you want me to compare....

All the CAI does is add volume under the hood and eat low-end power which can only be made up with a 3,500-4,000 RPM launch. Still the car is still no faster than bone stock if it made a 3,000 RPM launch.

I only like the CAI because of how it sounds which is the only reason why I prefer it over the stock airbox for myself which makes it somewhat of a lucky compromise for my car.

And boilermaker is right... it's just a stick with an air filter.

Bypass valves compromises with horsepower and technically don't work for ****. AEM only released it because people realized a CAI is a hazzard when submerged in water or sucks in water easier when going over puddles @ WOT but it doesn't work!
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #27  
Quote:
Boilermaker1: Since it is just "a filter on a bent stick," why did you buy an Injen CAI?
It was cheaper than the AEM at the time I bought it, I didn't have to go any where near the transmission or move anything to get it in there, and when I talked to both AEM and Injen before I bought it, AEM were asses and Injen was nice and helpful. It had nothing to do with what ever tiny gain it gave me, it was more an ease of install thing... but the filter enclosed in the bumper did help a bit.
But we're talking SRIs here, not CAIs. The SRIs all go to the basically the same place.... so they're basically all the same excluding the logo.
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #28  
Injen Cai
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #29  
wasnt there a chart/graph somewhere that showed the gain for each SRI/CAI? i think it was Injen vs. AEM. cna anyone post that up. itsll answer the performance part!
Reply 0
Jul 16, 2003
  #30  
I know that the magazine TPR did a comparison of the two.
Reply 0