synthetic oil a waste of money?
#122
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
i got my redline from local summit racing for around $10 each quart not too bad. from what i hear it has a unique smell lol. im guessing from the ester bases. maybe it smells like a banana. and a cheap wix filter. prolly wont be using them til july tho.
also i just remembered i still used lubecontrol additive in the synthetic oil, wonder if that has something to do with burnoff altho i dont see why...
also i just remembered i still used lubecontrol additive in the synthetic oil, wonder if that has something to do with burnoff altho i dont see why...
Last edited by gearbox; 03-15-2011 at 10:22 PM.
#123
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County California, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 163 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...Oils_FAQs.aspx
I went snooping around on Mobil's website and found this verification they use PAO based products in their formulas. I found another link that stated the "Extended Performance" Mobil 1 has 50% more "SuperSyn" than in their other formulations.
There was another statement that said damaged seals in older motors can leak more after adding Mobil 1. But it depends on the type of damage to the seal. If the seal has simply shrunk a bit, Mobil 1 may soften the seal and stop the leak. But Mobil 1 cannot repair other types of seal damage.
Lots of information there if you want to spend the time using the search function. But I could not find technical information supported by standardized testing, such as the cold pour point.
I went snooping around on Mobil's website and found this verification they use PAO based products in their formulas. I found another link that stated the "Extended Performance" Mobil 1 has 50% more "SuperSyn" than in their other formulations.
There was another statement that said damaged seals in older motors can leak more after adding Mobil 1. But it depends on the type of damage to the seal. If the seal has simply shrunk a bit, Mobil 1 may soften the seal and stop the leak. But Mobil 1 cannot repair other types of seal damage.
Lots of information there if you want to spend the time using the search function. But I could not find technical information supported by standardized testing, such as the cold pour point.
Last edited by Too Tall; 03-15-2011 at 11:01 PM.
#124
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
yeah i dont mind replacing a leaky seal after adding synthetic since it was bad to begin with. so far since 4 months ago not a drop anywhere, just the burning.
#125
Registered!!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
i know 2 guys that own a plane and they both say at the 2000hr service
they can tell if they used synthetic or conventional oil by the size of the bill
I run syn in the winter and conventional in summer.
they can tell if they used synthetic or conventional oil by the size of the bill
I run syn in the winter and conventional in summer.
#126
Banished to the Depths of Rice.
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal 714/909/626
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rep Power: 328 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
and i bet you 5 bucks you aren't really running real synthetic oil.
what do you run?
#127
Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
I'm also curious what synthetic oil you think is not a "real synthetic".
Buy the way I run Castrol 0w-30
#129
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
why not? better cold starting. and once the car warms up, the 30 weight is fine year round. i wouldve used that this time but all i could find locally was 5w30.
#131
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County California, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 163 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
I'm also curious what synthetic oil you think is not a "real synthetic".
The easiest way to tell between a good full synthetic and a barely better than dino synthetic, is if the oil has a cold pour point is the range of -60 F degrees below zero. Dino oils have a cold pour point of about - 20 F degrees.
#132
Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
OK, do I have the following right?
So basically synthetics are really good for extreme temperatures because they don't have the friction modifiers that dino oil does.
The molecules of full synthetic oil is smaller than dino oil, don't know if this actually is why it is required in some vehicles.
Synthetic oil CAN"T hold more dirt , metal or combustion by-products than dino oil.
Get a used oil analysis and check the metal numbers and TBN. If the metal numbers & TBN are good then you don't have to change your oil yet.
Metal shavings(and other crap), changes in the oil's viscosity (friction modifer damage or from contamination) and the level of TBN are the only things to worry about with engine wear. --Right/?
Dino oil and full synthetics need to be changed just as often in regards to carbon by-products, dirt & metal shaving contamination.
Synthetic oil's TBN (Total Base Number=amount of additives in the mix) don't last necessary any longer than a dino oil's TBN.
SO, the ONLY benefits to synthetics are the lack if friction modifiers and the fact that the moecules are smaller. With no friction modifiers that can get screwed up with extreme temperatures, you can increase your OCI without worrying about the viscosity of the oil changing.
-EDIT: Oh yeah and full Synthetic's flash points are higher than dino and pour point is lower.
--Am I right?
So basically synthetics are really good for extreme temperatures because they don't have the friction modifiers that dino oil does.
The molecules of full synthetic oil is smaller than dino oil, don't know if this actually is why it is required in some vehicles.
Synthetic oil CAN"T hold more dirt , metal or combustion by-products than dino oil.
Get a used oil analysis and check the metal numbers and TBN. If the metal numbers & TBN are good then you don't have to change your oil yet.
Metal shavings(and other crap), changes in the oil's viscosity (friction modifer damage or from contamination) and the level of TBN are the only things to worry about with engine wear. --Right/?
Dino oil and full synthetics need to be changed just as often in regards to carbon by-products, dirt & metal shaving contamination.
Synthetic oil's TBN (Total Base Number=amount of additives in the mix) don't last necessary any longer than a dino oil's TBN.
SO, the ONLY benefits to synthetics are the lack if friction modifiers and the fact that the moecules are smaller. With no friction modifiers that can get screwed up with extreme temperatures, you can increase your OCI without worrying about the viscosity of the oil changing.
-EDIT: Oh yeah and full Synthetic's flash points are higher than dino and pour point is lower.
--Am I right?
Last edited by danwat12345; 05-05-2011 at 11:27 PM. Reason: typos
#133
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
pretty much the engine feels like there is less resistance when it turns. does that mean more hp? not really. its just a smoother and more efficient engine. not a huge difference but its there. and with a good filtration system you can go longer between changes using synthetics. otherwise a dino oil will allow your engine to last 500k+ miles. synthetic holds its composition better under hi heat, but if you change dino every 5k it wont really matter.
#134
Banished to the Depths of Rice.
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal 714/909/626
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rep Power: 328 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
OK, do I have the following right?
So basically synthetics are really good for extreme temperatures because they don't have the friction modifiers that dino oil does.
The molecules of full synthetic oil is smaller than dino oil, don't know if this actually is why it is required in some vehicles.
Synthetic oil CAN"T hold more dirt , metal or combustion by-products than dino oil.
Get a used oil analysis and check the metal numbers and TBN. If the metal numbers & TBN are good then you don't have to change your oil yet.
Metal shavings(and other crap), changes in the oil's viscosity (friction modifer damage or from contamination) and the level of TBN are the only things to worry about with engine wear. --Right/?
Dino oil and full synthetics need to be changed just as often in regards to carbon by-products, dirt & metal shaving contamination.
Synthetic oil's TBN (Total Base Number=amount of additives in the mix) don't last necessary any longer than a dino oil's TBN.
SO, the ONLY benefits to synthetics are the lack if friction modifiers and the fact that the moecules are smaller. With no friction modifiers that can get screwed up with extreme temperatures, you can increase your OCI without worrying about the viscosity of the oil changing.
-EDIT: Oh yeah and full Synthetic's flash points are higher than dino and pour point is lower.
--Am I right?
So basically synthetics are really good for extreme temperatures because they don't have the friction modifiers that dino oil does.
The molecules of full synthetic oil is smaller than dino oil, don't know if this actually is why it is required in some vehicles.
Synthetic oil CAN"T hold more dirt , metal or combustion by-products than dino oil.
Get a used oil analysis and check the metal numbers and TBN. If the metal numbers & TBN are good then you don't have to change your oil yet.
Metal shavings(and other crap), changes in the oil's viscosity (friction modifer damage or from contamination) and the level of TBN are the only things to worry about with engine wear. --Right/?
Dino oil and full synthetics need to be changed just as often in regards to carbon by-products, dirt & metal shaving contamination.
Synthetic oil's TBN (Total Base Number=amount of additives in the mix) don't last necessary any longer than a dino oil's TBN.
SO, the ONLY benefits to synthetics are the lack if friction modifiers and the fact that the moecules are smaller. With no friction modifiers that can get screwed up with extreme temperatures, you can increase your OCI without worrying about the viscosity of the oil changing.
-EDIT: Oh yeah and full Synthetic's flash points are higher than dino and pour point is lower.
--Am I right?
the reason why you want a true synthetic is because EVERY molecule is the same because they are man made. it also allows for less additives that are not as good for the atmosphere and ur car. the size of the molecule has no real relevance.
the reason why they call dino oil here synthetic is because oil companies have found a way to extract the sulfur n a few other elements out of the dino oil (and the refinement process also is much more advance then what it was years ago, hence "more pure" oil)
#135
Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
pretty much the engine feels like there is less resistance when it turns. does that mean more hp? not really. its just a smoother and more efficient engine. not a huge difference but its there. and with a good filtration system you can go longer between changes using synthetics. otherwise a dino oil will allow your engine to last 500k+ miles. synthetic holds its composition better under hi heat, but if you change dino every 5k it wont really matter.
#136
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
synthetic 5w30 stays at that viscosity, dino degrades over time. there are also lubricity differences.
#137
Registered!!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
so I think I would personally listen to them over say you.
Where you get your info from the internet, your not looking in the right spot
or you cant read.
groundless accusarions...lol its called experience.
Oh and I burn both ...
sythetic in winter
regular in summa
#138
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County California, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 163 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
So basically synthetics are really good for extreme temperatures because they don't have the friction modifiers that dino oil does.
The molecules of full synthetic oil is smaller than dino oil, don't know if this actually is why it is required in some vehicles.
Synthetic oil CAN"T hold more dirt , metal or combustion by-products than dino oil.
Get a used oil analysis and check the metal numbers and TBN. If the metal numbers & TBN are good then you don't have to change your oil yet.
Dino oil and full synthetics need to be changed just as often in regards to carbon by-products, dirt & metal shaving contamination.
Synthetic oil's TBN (Total Base Number=amount of additives in the mix) don't last necessary any longer than a dino oil's TBN.
Oh yeah and full Synthetic's flash points are higher than dino and pour point is lower.
SO, the ONLY benefits to synthetics are the lack if friction modifiers and the fact that the moecules are smaller. With no friction modifiers that can get screwed up with extreme temperatures, you can increase your OCI without worrying about the viscosity of the oil changing.
Go to Amsoil's web site and read the comparisons of oils they have posted. Lots of graphs and explanations.
Last edited by Too Tall; 05-07-2011 at 12:48 AM.
#139
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County California, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 163 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
does that mean more hp? not really.
a dino oil will allow your engine to last 500k+ miles.
Viscosity is viscosity. 5w30 is 5w30. Same force (against friction if Velocity=constant) required to move a rod thru synthetic or dino fluid of the same viscosity rating at a constant velocity... right?
sythetic in winter
regular in summa
regular in summa
#140
Banished to the Depths of Rice.
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal 714/909/626
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rep Power: 328 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
since they owned it for last 15yrs and have had many 2000 hr services
so I think I would personally listen to them over say you.
Where you get your info from the internet, your not looking in the right spot
or you cant read.
groundless accusarions...lol its called experience.
Oh and I burn both ...
sythetic in winter
regular in summa
so I think I would personally listen to them over say you.
Where you get your info from the internet, your not looking in the right spot
or you cant read.
groundless accusarions...lol its called experience.
Oh and I burn both ...
sythetic in winter
regular in summa
so you never answered my question. what oil are u running.
you afraid of telling us?
and groundless accU? lol. you cant simply look at an engine and tell that it has been running syn or not. because 95% of what is in the US is NOT a real synthetic, even tho it says so on the bottle.
so explain that.
i doubt that any more than a few of those "2000 hrs" of service mean **** in terms of specialized detail oil knowledge.
mechanics only know the basic and most dont know the in dept or to a specialization standpoint. go to a dealership or a mech shop and ask them about group III/IV or PAO oils... or how its filtered...
#141
Registered!!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
so you never answered my question. what oil are u running.
you afraid of telling us?
and groundless accU? lol. you cant simply look at an engine and tell that it has been running syn or not. because 95% of what is in the US is NOT a real synthetic, even tho it says so on the bottle.
so explain that.
i doubt that any more than a few of those "2000 hrs" of service mean **** in terms of specialized detail oil knowledge.
mechanics only know the basic and most dont know the in dept or to a specialization standpoint. go to a dealership or a mech shop and ask them about group III/IV or PAO oils... or how its filtered...
you afraid of telling us?
and groundless accU? lol. you cant simply look at an engine and tell that it has been running syn or not. because 95% of what is in the US is NOT a real synthetic, even tho it says so on the bottle.
so explain that.
i doubt that any more than a few of those "2000 hrs" of service mean **** in terms of specialized detail oil knowledge.
mechanics only know the basic and most dont know the in dept or to a specialization standpoint. go to a dealership or a mech shop and ask them about group III/IV or PAO oils... or how its filtered...
what is the very last thing i put i my post please read slooowwlly.
And what they say cause they have burnt both in thier plane syn and regular
matter fact out for beers last week they have another comming up is when they burn syn between thier 2000 hr maint window the service cost them less because of less wear and less parts used to be certified again.
And as one fine poster pointed out everything done to the plane is documented, by law.
So if its not real synthetic what is it?
Mobol1 quaker state and valvoline are all lyin when they put 100% synthetic on the jug.
#142
Premium Member
Hey! Look At Me!! I'm a Supporting Member!!
iTrader: (95)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NV
Age: 43
Posts: 51,241
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
13 Posts
Rep Power: 787 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
yeah they are lying. there was a lawsuit while back about this and judge decided it was okay to call something "synthetic" even tho it wasnt a pure/real synthetic oil. redline is very different from valvoline for example.
#143
Banished to the Depths of Rice.
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal 714/909/626
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rep Power: 328 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
I don't wanna say what I use? WTF? you confirmed my suspision that you don't read, or maybe don't comprehend.
what is the very last thing i put i my post please read slooowwlly.
And what they say cause they have burnt both in thier plane syn and regular
matter fact out for beers last week they have another comming up is when they burn syn between thier 2000 hr maint window the service cost them less because of less wear and less parts used to be certified again.
And as one fine poster pointed out everything done to the plane is documented, by law.
So if its not real synthetic what is it?
Mobol1 quaker state and valvoline are all lyin when they put 100% synthetic on the jug.
what is the very last thing i put i my post please read slooowwlly.
And what they say cause they have burnt both in thier plane syn and regular
matter fact out for beers last week they have another comming up is when they burn syn between thier 2000 hr maint window the service cost them less because of less wear and less parts used to be certified again.
And as one fine poster pointed out everything done to the plane is documented, by law.
So if its not real synthetic what is it?
Mobol1 quaker state and valvoline are all lyin when they put 100% synthetic on the jug.
can you not real? i asked what KIND of oil you used....you know, the brand.
because there are only TWO known TRUE synthetics (man made group IV) in the US. redline, MOTUL 300v, AMSOIL. both in 10w-40. they are a true man made synthetic group IV PAO oil.
everything else on the market (mobile1, shell rotella, quarker, castro, penzoil...etc) are are type III oil. and type III oil is a dino based oil but HERE IN THE USA, THEY CAN BE LABLED AS "FULL SYNTHETIC." THE US OIL COMPANIES HAVE FOUND A WAY HOW TO LABLE IT AS "FULL SYNTHETIC" DUE TO THE LOOP HOLE IN US LEGISLATION: THE REMOVAL/REFINEMENT OF SULFUR (biggest loop hole they use for their arguement)
(CAPS: i am not yelling. just making it clear what is the important part to read)
There are no absolute definitions in the US that oil companies must adhere to when labeling a product Fully Synthetic. And no Oil manufacturer I've seen lists the "Group #" for the base oils included in the bottle. They are very hush-hush about it (because as we know, their marketing team is amazing good at what they do). Group III (these are not real syn) base stocks are considered synthetic motor oil only in the United States; elsewhere they are not allowed to be marketed as "synthetic" (like europe and the rest of the world because they have tighter legislation).
now...with that said. i asked you what oil you ran for a reason...so i can tell you that "you arent really running true synthetic and ur like the rest of the [majority] US population: uneducated when it comes to oil.
which brings me back to my original point about ur omnipotent mechanic. 99% of the cars he see will all be running groupIII "full synthetics" (which i remind you again are not really synthetics, because synthetic means man-made).
and here is another fact, most oil have the greatest break down point around 500-800 miles (then they slowly break down afterward), and mind you, most high performance race cars change their oil out every race so it doesnt matter for them.
and just to let yo know, if you are not paying around $15 a QUART for oil, big chances are they are NOT group IV synthetic oils.
amsoil and motul 300v 10w40 both run around $15+ per quart.
if you really want to educate yourself in oil read up on it. there are tons of books and articles. i know about all this because it was a required subject for my fluid dynamics class.
Last edited by sl33pyriceboi; 05-07-2011 at 11:56 AM.
#145
Registered!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Orange County California, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rep Power: 163 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
you cant simply look at an engine and tell that it has been running syn or not.
because there are only TWO known TRUE synthetics (man made group IV) in the US. redline, MOTUL 300v, AMSOIL. both in 10w-40. they are a true man made synthetic group IV PAO oil.
and here is another fact, most oil have the greatest break down point around 500-800 miles (then they slowly break down afterward), and mind you, most high performance race cars change their oil out every race so it doesnt matter for them.
I agree about doing your own research, but evidently that fluid dynamics class was a little short on real world facts and experience.
#146
Banished to the Depths of Rice.
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SoCal 714/909/626
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Rep Power: 328 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
^mmm good info but the 500m-800m was based on a research from a professor at some university (like ucla i believe) that ran oil analysis. he did a oil-break down experiment... let me look if i can find that article somewhere.
plus with the sludge and stuff, there are just wayyyyyyyy too many variables to consider. if a person ran a true synthetic groupIV, and ran it for 15k+ before any kind of oil change and if he has a shitty filter (just throwing it out), it would cause a substantial amount of sludge as well.
plus with the sludge and stuff, there are just wayyyyyyyy too many variables to consider. if a person ran a true synthetic groupIV, and ran it for 15k+ before any kind of oil change and if he has a shitty filter (just throwing it out), it would cause a substantial amount of sludge as well.
Last edited by sl33pyriceboi; 05-09-2011 at 03:46 PM.
#147
Whachya lookin at?
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Age: 38
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
7 Posts
Rep Power: 288 Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
All these oil threads drive me crazy..... lol... mainly because I don't care, my engine is protected with whatever oil I decide to use and synthetic is downright a complete and utter waste of money. My engine will last just as long as anyone here who uses synthetic, I don't care what tests say. The companies that run the tests get paid to modify the results anyway... seriously.. 55 dollars per oil change for oil is insane. The only advantage is you can run it a bit longer but even that I don't 100% believe in... You guys can flame me all you want for this but I think you are all giving your hard earned money to oil companies which is fine if that's what you want to do. I have 110k miles on my car with no oil related issues whatsoever and I go 8000kms inbetween oil changes with Dino oil... I've probably saved up enough money at this point to buy myself a new D17 as compared to those using top of the line synthetic. It's not like we race these cars. At least I don't. I do however drive it much harder than your average Joe.
LoL
LoL
Last edited by BlueEM2; 05-09-2011 at 08:42 AM.
#148
Re: synthetic oil a waste of money?
There are no absolute definitions in the US that oil companies must adhere to when labeling a product Fully Synthetic. And no Oil manufacturer I've seen lists the "Group #" for the base oils included in the bottle. They are very hush-hush about it (because as we know, their marketing team is amazing good at what they do). Group III (these are not real syn) base stocks are considered synthetic motor oil only in the United States; elsewhere they are not allowed to be marketed as "synthetic" (like europe and the rest of the world because they have tighter legislation).
if you really want to educate yourself in oil read up on it. there are tons of books and articles. i know about all this because it was a required subject for my fluid dynamics class.
if you really want to educate yourself in oil read up on it. there are tons of books and articles. i know about all this because it was a required subject for my fluid dynamics class.
I guess what I am getting at is when someone says Mobil1 or Penzoil Platinum or what ever is a Group III and not a Group IV what are they basing that on? Did they really hear it from a chemical engineer at the actual oil company or from a mechanic who heard something about it? I would also point out that formulations change so what was true 1 or 2 years ago may or may not be true now.
I am not an expert, just an engineer that likes to play with cars and finds oil interesting. If anyone would like to learn from people that work in the oil industry, once again I recommend Bobistheoilguy.com. For anyone looking for answers such as "is Amsoil/Redline/Royal Purple better than Mobil1" you may not get an answer but you will get a discussion of each oil. By the way I find it interesting that in the poll of which oil they use almost 20% use Mobil1 and even more use Penzoil.